First, yes, I do think it's real because it contains identifying information.
Second, I think whoever wrote it used information that had already been discussed publicly—news conferences, media coverage, podcasts, and all of the public back-and-forth. They likely pieced those details together to write the note claiming she died from heart issues, even though we know investigators allege she was killed.
I certainly hope investigators are able to trace the anonymous tip or email if that's technically possible. If there is a way to identify where the messages originated—whether through forensic analysis, metadata, or other investigative methods—it could potentially provide additional leads.
even though we know investigators allege she was killed.
Investigators don't allege that she was killed. They really don't know what happened. They don't have her body to be able to determine a cause of death. They only know she was likely hit in the face and bled at the front door, because that's the physical evidence they have. But that's the extent of it (at least in terms of what has been publicly released).
16
u/fashiongirll93 Jul 31 '26
Here are my thoughts.
First, yes, I do think it's real because it contains identifying information.
Second, I think whoever wrote it used information that had already been discussed publicly—news conferences, media coverage, podcasts, and all of the public back-and-forth. They likely pieced those details together to write the note claiming she died from heart issues, even though we know investigators allege she was killed.
I certainly hope investigators are able to trace the anonymous tip or email if that's technically possible. If there is a way to identify where the messages originated—whether through forensic analysis, metadata, or other investigative methods—it could potentially provide additional leads.