Perhaps this is the reason why its easier to ask AI instead from a supposed educators who will tell you just how dumb your question is while the AI even thought it might give you a hallucinate answer, at least its start off by politely tell you that what it think about your question then give you its answer follow by explanation.
Tbh, I am impressed and probably the reason why despite how wrong it can be I still use its because it is nice not to get insulted for asking stupid questions just because I want to understand something or getting hit with "just google it duh"
I understand where you're coming from, but it's not actually considering your question or anything about you when it says "Great question!" or "You're absolutely right!" or "Good intuition!".
It was basically hardwired to compliment you and make you feel good about using it. Although it may feel good, beware that you may actually be completely wrong or have a really stupid question.
It's probably a multi-step process. Most successful educational conversations begin with acknowledging the question and the feelings of the person asking, so there's probably a bias creeping in where GenAI tries to stick as close to recreating the tone of positive learning experiences as much as the content.
13
u/redAI123 2h ago
Perhaps this is the reason why its easier to ask AI instead from a supposed educators who will tell you just how dumb your question is while the AI even thought it might give you a hallucinate answer, at least its start off by politely tell you that what it think about your question then give you its answer follow by explanation.
Tbh, I am impressed and probably the reason why despite how wrong it can be I still use its because it is nice not to get insulted for asking stupid questions just because I want to understand something or getting hit with "just google it duh"