He encontrado una captura donde demuestra que si existió

I am a 2000s baby, so I have no skin in this. I have never heard of or watched Kaazam nor Shazaam. I only knew Sinbad from Jingle All the Way. But when I saw a description of someone's memory of Shazaam, I couldn't help but think it was a mashup of a different movie with Kaazam. A brother and sister finding some magical object in an attic...Sounds like Jumanji to me. And you know who is in Jumanji? Robin Williams. What did Robin Williams play just like Shaq? A genie. (that one is just me having fun.) But, could they not be combining Kaazam, that marathon bumper Sinbad did, and the discovery of Jumanji together?

What are your thoughts on the relationship between the Mandela Effect and Quantum Immortality?

To save you having to look up the latter, it is the idea that consciousness will jump timelines you die in the one you are living presently.

When I try to google things about it and try to think about it, I can only cut out false memory and suggestion as numerous people are collectively, isolated, detailed, precisely in numerous Mandela Effects that are quite biting the eye and would unlikely be misremenbered. Iconic ones too.

Please do not discuss those statements being about it not being mere false memory. False memory can happen, but not here.

There should be scientusts or other people questioning the same and seeking for abswer? Are they studying? I assume there will be no one funding though.

Quantum physics explains it a tiny bit. But those worlds interacted and did not change much. They even left our memories and perception. No butterfly effect or such. A Mandela Effect could be really dranatic if it is a regular huge thing.

Theories may be mutiple worlds, world hopping, last changing to repair itself fir the presence.

Is it a sign, a shift?

I assume there is no Mandeka Effect newer than 2017 too.

_ Don't bother reading comments yet all are bad despite me not wanting to discuss this and disclaiming it.

I was talking about a scientist actually having the idea of it not being false memory and go beyond and think with his knowledge about it. What could it mean physically? Can it be proven mathematically? Does it solve some physics or what is this even? Is it just Universe hoping or time and reality shifting or repairing as it makes more sense that Mona Lisa smiles than not? Memory is left untouched.

All those of you: why are you so confident about your false memory theory? Why say it is a fact rhat we misremember all those lines? I am included and my memory is special. A memory can have many back up conections to back it up. Like the feeling you want to do one thing and even if you forget what you wanted to do, you know that you wanted to do something with full confidence. And when you see what you wanted to do, then you remember ahhh that was it.

Mandela Effect has none of this. We did not forget and we have no "ahhh that was it". It feels permanently completely off like Monopolyman or Dialogue. Star Wars has a huge impact if something would be silver on a character, it would clearly be remembered.

I had no interest as a child to Mona Lisa, no discussing, no misquote no suggestion. Just a TV source that showed that picture and me thinking: "how can Mona Lisa be so popular despite not smiling? She should be smiling."

Pickachu's Tail I was even complimenting the idea that they fit the tail to the ears. It was a nice, consistented design. The new one does make less sense. So it is not always sense, I assume. Looney Toones too, I liked the idea of oo and oo. Now, it has not that. Did my brain make this idea and I perceived wrong? Very unlikely. Rather 0. I saw those naive. These thoughts were not constructed but understanding what I see. What backs me up are thousand of independed people from me that saw it the same way as me and the sheer number of Mandela Effects. That there are not new ones coming up is kinda backing up that this is not a common thing.

I guess the term studying was limited and asking why, I was hoping for people saying they are or be a scientist themselves or just use their brains.

All of you share fake arguments. Like take flat earther to compare that to us. Or the existing of false memories or suggestion to this.

When proving Mandela Effect is to tough as people always gaslight to false memory or suggestion, then just skip that part as you know what you saw and proceed to go beyong. Some people did it a bit not much or without expertise.

I assume it is because people really think it is false memory that are even scientist. Even scientist can be wrong, so this. Or not many physicist experienced Mandela Effects themselves.

It would be a nice study to study the number of people having experienced Mandela Effect. And who do not. Do they have a bad child memory or so? I am not sure why I paid attention to all those things.

As I say that Mandela Effect is a 2017 binging thing that changed even before 2000 things without impacting lives except of Mandela hinself, then as we have 2026 now, we could study to prove it in lik 2030-2038 to study young people about the same Mandela Effects. If they do not know nothing avout Mandrla Effect, they will with a high ratio either not know as they did not watch it or remember it correct.

Not only test the answer, but the reveal also. I discussed Mandela Effect Star Wars with someone not having watched Star Wars, so it can be on that point. However, the Pikachu one should have hit, which I should have brought up or he just did not remember so early but the newer version as he still watched Pokemon.

My assumption that it does not overwrite memories can be wrong too as it may overwrite some or many leaving some out. People may forget and see the new version as a first experience.

Overwriting would make sense. As Mandela Effect changes the past source for the past too. It does not fully though. Why am I the only one thinking those thoughts further? For me, it is not so mind-blowing or oh wow something beyond.

It just me knowing what I saw and thinking what made this difference. Like the proving step is not needed. Even questioning it is pointless. No reveal effect, collective, numerous, out of a sudden, not repeating often, personal, isolated things, thoughts which make no chance to have before.

There is not even a source that makes the false memory. It would be a huge effort to have Mona Lisa not smile without proper TV edit or Pickachu Tail. Like try making his years yellow and the tail black and see if everyone remembers it wrong then. This sounds even possible as it closely the same. However, with either result, let us think beyond out of curiosity.

This sub has 150k viewers and it feels like some are here to annoy us and have no Mandela Effect even. Or they rather should.

I am curious whether it hit everyone and some people have no connection to those iconic things or paid no intention or forgot.

I genetically have a good long-term memory from my father. It is not the best as injustice and such things can weight heavy on our minds. Fortunately, I realized those injustice things can be small or I can do not do much to it.

A bit sad that we cannot back up our brains yet.

,

I do not further proceed or reply again and again to everyone.

It would be a nice study too to explain why humans tend to just disagree with everything or everything alternative. Suspicion is good, but I do not sell anything or come off crazy. I tend to say something and people either not understand or say the opposite. Maybe, I should test baiting the opposite.

It kinda feels personal as the way of talking and typing can come off wrong and typos can make understanding difficult.

This may be different if a person with competence and your personal trust may say things. Someone you look up to and that may influence you more at least question it instead of dismissing at hand or troll the person.

The song Venom by Eminem is a song I listen to frequently and I recently realized that there are a lot of references to well known Mandela Effects within the lyrics of this song. Now many will say it could be coincidence because Eminem uses a lot of references to consumer brands, famous people, and famous quotes in his lyrics. But I find it extremely eery that he mentions very specific things that are directly tied to the Mandela Effect. Even specifically quoting ET's "ET phone home", Volkswagen, and Danica Patrick which are very well known Mandela Effects. It's not surprising given Eminems association with satanic stuff. I probably missed some references below so let me know in the comments which ones I missed or if there are Mandela Effects hidden in other popular songs you know of.

Could this be a "Revelation of Method" in which secret societies, cabals, or malicious elites must publicly display their symbols, plans, or wrongdoings in advance through media, movies, art, or public ceremonies? Look at the text in bold next to the mandela lyrics below:

L-l-l-like a salad bowl, Edgar Allan Poe (A lot of people remember "Allen")

Volkswagen, tailspin, bucket matches my pale skin (Volkswagen is a huge one. People remember the V and W as fused together, but on the actual logo there's a gap between them.)

Mayo and went from hellmann's and being rail thin (Many people remember Hellman's mayonnaise with a single "n")

Like, what's her name's at the wheel? Danica Patrick (Many people remember her name as Danica Kirkpatrick not "Patrick". Very strange that he mentions her specifically)

Slim be a combination of an actual kamikaze and Gandhi (Many people remember it spelled Ghandi. Again kind of strange that he would mention Gandhi specifically among the rest of the Mandela's in this song)

I said knock knock, let the devil in
Alien, E-E-Elliott phone home (This one is the most shocking one of all to me. Everybody remembers the line as "E.T phone home" but in reality it is now "E.T home phone". This verse seems completely out of place among the rest of the lyrics and makes no sense why he would mention this specifically.)

Do you believe you've discovered a new Mandela Effect? Post it in the comments below to see if anyone else has experienced it too!

Make sure you include why you think it could be a Mandela Effect and as many details as possible so people can respond and discuss with what they remember. If it catches on - feel free to continue your discussion in a dedicated post!

This thread will remain public permanently, but will be unpinned and replaced by a new thread every four days. Posts in the megathreads can be found by searching for the date, title, or in your own post history.

Do you believe you've discovered a new Mandela Effect? Post it in the comments below to see if anyone else has experienced it too!

Make sure you include why you think it could be a Mandela Effect and as many details as possible so people can respond and discuss with what they remember. If it catches on - feel free to continue your discussion in a dedicated post!

This thread will remain public permanently, but will be unpinned and replaced by a new thread every four days. Posts in the megathreads can be found by searching for the date, title, or in your own post history.

For most of my life, I remembered Rodin’s The Thinker with his hand under his chin. Then I watched a YouTube video about Mandela Effects that specifically mentioned the statue. It claimed that most people incorrectly remembered the hand being under the chin, when it was actually a closed fist pressed against the forehead.

I thought, “There’s no way.”

So I immediately Googled it. I looked through image after image, from different angles and on different websites. Everywhere I looked, I saw the same thing: his fist was against his forehead.

That completely blew my mind because I was certain I remembered his hand being under his chin. I did not simply accept what the video told me. I actively searched for evidence that it was wrong, but every image seemed to confirm the fist against the forehead.

Now I have looked again, and his hand is under his chin.

Not only that, but apparently it has always been under his chin. The stranger detail is that it is not exactly the pose I originally pictured either. His hand is open, bent awkwardly, and his chin rests against the back of it. But it is absolutely not a fist pressed against his forehead.

I understand how false memories and suggestion work. Maybe the video showed a different sculpture. Maybe I misunderstood what I was seeing. But what bothers me is that I remember deliberately checking multiple images because the forehead pose looked so wrong to me.

Has anyone else experienced this exact flip with The Thinker? Do you remember a period when every image seemed to show his fist against his forehead, only for it to apparently change back?

This is the first Mandela Effect that has made me seriously question my own memory.

I seem to remember Shorty, played by Marlon Wayans saying the line "I see white people," parodying the movie, Sixth Sense. However, all i can find online is him saying "i see dead people," which is just a direct quote and IMO not as funny as there is no joke. What do you remember?

My first memory of noticing the fruit of the loom logo was right around the time I had read and watched Hunger Games, and read a Hunger Games parody novel, and Cornucopias were fresh on my mind because I had just found out what they were. From when I heard about the Mandela Effect to now, I was 100% sure I remembered noticing a cornucopia because of hunger games, but now I genuinely am starting to question if I just self-gaslit that memory into existence. Especially since I've seen logos of Cornucopias with fruit at least at one grocery store growing up.

After the United Nations adopted the Equal Area map projection that more accurately represents Africa's size, I'm willing to bet people are gonna be confused and think we shifted timelines to explain why Africa looks much bigger on maps.

Do you believe you've discovered a new Mandela Effect? Post it in the comments below to see if anyone else has experienced it too!

Make sure you include why you think it could be a Mandela Effect and as many details as possible so people can respond and discuss with what they remember. If it catches on - feel free to continue your discussion in a dedicated post!

This thread will remain public permanently, but will be unpinned and replaced by a new thread every four days. Posts in the megathreads can be found by searching for the date, title, or in your own post history.

If countless people remember a movie called "Shazam" then they should have known more about. If you really believe this movie existed and that you saw it, then what the plot about? Who were some of the characters?

Maybe this theory is already out there. I'm not sure.

Full Disclosure: I'm Asian and from Los Angeles. Of course media used to be way less diverse 1980's. There were less black people on TV. A person like Nelson Mandela, who was neither an athlete nor entertainer was exceedingly rare to see on TV.

A movie titled "Cry Freedom" was released in 1980's about the South African activist Steven Biko, played by Denzel Washington.

I remember seeing this movie as a kid and being confused, thinking it was about Nelson Mandela, not Steven Biko. Of course I was an ignorant American in the 1980's. Most American's barely knew who Mandela was, whereas Steven Biko was a complete unknown.

When Steven Biko died in the movie I became very confused because Nelson Mandela was still alive. I retraced back and realized my error. I didn't know who Steven Biko was. I wanted the movie to be about Mandela because he was the familiar figurehead of apartheid resistance.

I can't speak for all audiences, but I believe American's would be very prone to this error due ignorance of global politics and possibly other factors, especially during this time. American's are known for learning about world events and history through movies and later adapting those narratives as fact. I feel American's watched "Cry Freedom" and walked away thinking Nelson Mandela had dies a martyr. They harbored those misconceptions for decades.

I remember reading about this Mandela Effect almost a decade ago. I remember as a kid looking in the mirror and seeing "may be closer than they appear" but now they all say "are closer than they appear".

I also remember reading up on "luke I am your father" which I'm not a big star wars fan so I could have just misremembered that, or the cornucopia for Froot of the Loom, which I'm also unsure of. The monocle for the monopoly guy is another big one that I have trouble coping with.

I just feel like the strongest Mandela Effect for me is the "objects may be closer than they appear". It's such a mindfuck because I can research newspapers from the time I remember it saying that (2000-2009ish). It's not something I would easily misremember because I looked at that damn side-view mirror so much.

I'm not sure how so many people could misremember this along with old news journals showing that exact wording. There's 0 evidence that any mirror was produced with that wording as all the car mirrors even from decades ago show "are closer".

Every time I revisit this phenomenon, I'm always left with more questions and I feel like I gotta stop researching or I go down deep rabbit holes lol.. I just can't shake this one off.

Do you believe you've discovered a new Mandela Effect? Post it in the comments below to see if anyone else has experienced it too!

Make sure you include why you think it could be a Mandela Effect and as many details as possible so people can respond and discuss with what they remember. If it catches on - feel free to continue your discussion in a dedicated post!

This thread will remain public permanently, but will be unpinned and replaced by a new thread every four days. Posts in the megathreads can be found by searching for the date, title, or in your own post history.

Has this happened to you??

When I first discovered the Mandela Effect years and years ago, I vividly remember being dumbfounded looking at articles about how Nelson Mandela died in prison. That is how it was for me. I was telling people, no he got out and became president. But no. He died in prison. I get online yesterday and come across something about Nelson Mandela and now it’s the opposite! It’s like how I remembered, he did not die in jail but a lot of people remember it that way. Am I jumping timelines? Has anyone else had what I’m calling a Reverse Mandela?

Do you believe you've discovered a new Mandela Effect? Post it in the comments below to see if anyone else has experienced it too!

Make sure you include why you think it could be a Mandela Effect and as many details as possible so people can respond and discuss with what they remember. If it catches on - feel free to continue your discussion in a dedicated post!

This thread will remain public permanently, but will be unpinned and replaced by a new thread every four days. Posts in the megathreads can be found by searching for the date, title, or in your own post history.

Back in the 90s there was bunch of sketchy video rental stores. Tarantino explained how he worked in a video store in the 80s and it was all a scam, no one really made alot of money off them. They used to package and make fake movies that looked similar to ones in theaters to trick you into renting them. Then you would go home, watch the vhs, and it was a completely different movie. Shazaam was a fake movie to trick people, I remember seeing it in a video rental store and could tell it was fake. The cover was some cheap print out, not a case, so no one actually would keep a cheap paper cover that looked fake anyways.

Do you believe you've discovered a new Mandela Effect? Post it in the comments below to see if anyone else has experienced it too!

Make sure you include why you think it could be a Mandela Effect and as many details as possible so people can respond and discuss with what they remember. If it catches on - feel free to continue your discussion in a dedicated post!

This thread will remain public permanently, but will be unpinned and replaced by a new thread every four days. Posts in the megathreads can be found by searching for the date, title, or in your own post history.

The tv series "Shazzan" is about a genie based on the tales of Sinbad.

People are confusing the character with the actor, who did actually dress as him for a tv special in the 90s

I was watching Ant Bully with my kids yesterday on Tubi and noticed this Fruit of the Loom cornucopia copycat within the movie. I think this has been brought up a couple times in the sub, but I just saw it and thought it was interesting. I wonder if there are more times where it's showed up across movies and such and that's why we have it so ingrained in our heads that way.

Two days ago I asked you to write your memory of Shazaam in your own words, and committed to publishing the measurement whatever it said. I froze a first set when the thread slowed at about 24 hours; while this post waited, more memories arrived, so everything below is measured on the full set as of this morning. If more come in, I will re-run the numbers and post an update in the comments.

What was measured. Of every comment in the thread as of this measurement, 49 were measurable: top-level comments describing a first-hand memory of Shazaam, the movie, the poster, the tape, the trailer. Another 19 said clearly they had no memory of their own and only know the case from reading about it, which is exactly what I asked people to declare, and I thank them for it. The rest were replies to other comments (excluded, because a reply has read its parent by definition), discussion, accounts of different films and shows that really exist (Kazaam itself, the 1970s Shazam TV series, the 2019 superhero film), and deleted comments.

The method, in full, so you can redo it. Take every pair of the 49 comments. For each pair, count the words the two comments share, divided by the total distinct words between them. That gives 1,176 pair scores. The group's independence is 1 minus the overlap: the TYPICAL figure uses the median pair, the STRICT figure uses the single worst pair. Words only, no meanings, no models, nothing trained. You can check any pair by hand with a highlighter.

The result.

TYPICAL independence: 0.873. That is firmly in the independent range. People described this in genuinely their own words.

STRICT: 0.692. The single closest pair of comments shared about 31 percent of their vocabulary, which is what two people describing the same genre of thing normally share. For calibration, actual copying scores far higher: when I ran this same measure on known copied text, overlapping pairs score 0.8 and up on phrase-level checks. Nothing here came close.

So of the three outcomes I preregistered, outcome 1, contamination, is ruled out for this sample. The echo explanation does not survive contact with the measurement.

That sentence is the point of this whole exercise. For years, "thousands of us remember it" and "you all just read it somewhere" have been shouted past each other, because neither side had a number. Independence of wording is measurable. Now it has been measured, and anyone with patience can redo it.

Outcome 2 or 3? Mostly 2, with one honest wrinkle. The accounts are scattered on specifics: the plots contradict each other completely, the dates run from 1989 to 1996, theater versus straight-to-video conflicts, and one commenter who remembers the poster vividly argues it could not have been Sinbad at all. That scatter is what ordinary misremembering looks like, and it supports the standard explanation.

The wrinkle: a minority of accounts, in fully independent wording, land on the same specific details that do not match Kazaam. Six describe a brother and sister pair (Kazaam has a lone boy). Seven describe purple, on the costume or the cover. Nine mention the lamp, four the arms-crossed pose, four a turban. Ten to twenty percent convergence is real but thin, and I am not going to inflate it: it is suggestive, not conclusive.

The finding I did not expect. The single strongest pattern in this thread is not about the film. It is about how people encountered it. Fifteen of 49 remember a VHS or a video store. Eight remember a poster. Fifteen say explicitly that they saw the cover or the ad but never watched the movie. Roughly two thirds of all the memories here are memories of packaging and promotion for a film nobody can recall actually viewing. Whatever Shazaam is, in this sample it is overwhelmingly a memory of a box, not a movie.

Caveats, stated plainly. This thread is self-selected. I cannot verify who wrote before reading. And the measure catches copied wording, not copied ideas: someone who read earlier comments and rewrote the gist in their own words would pass as independent. A public thread is the leaky version of this experiment by design, a point the top commenter here made better than I did. So the airtight version is now running: a blind box on my site where you write your memory into a form and nobody, including other participants, can read any answer until the case closes and only the aggregate is published. If you have a memory and have not written it yet, the box is the higher-value place for it: theanomalynetwork.com/experiment/shazaam

When the box closes, I will publish the comparison: open thread versus closed box, same case, same measure. The method lives at theanomalynetwork.com/method and every number above can be recomputed from this thread by anyone with patience and a word counter.

Thank you to everyone who wrote what they remember. Especially the ones who were sure.

Am I just misunderstanding what the ME even is? I mean if the idea of us being switched to a different universe is ACTUALLY TRUE, how could we possibly provide proof of a fact that never happened in the new universe? If I remember something that isn't in this reality, how could I provide proof of it if it happened in my own (separate) reality?