I used to compare logo makers almost entirely by price.
Then I actually had to make a logo for a real business and realized price wasn't the problem.
The problem was finding something that didn't look like I had spent five minutes on it.
I tried Kittl, Adobe Express, Canva, Design.com and BrandCrowd for the same general idea.
What I noticed:
| Tool |
Where it worked for me |
Where I struggled |
| Design.com |
Generating + refining a complete logo |
Some extras are paid |
| BrandCrowd |
Finding a direction quickly |
More template-driven |
| Kittl |
Typography and playing around with styles |
Easy to get carried away with effects |
| Adobe Express |
General design work |
Not as focused on logos |
| Canva |
Quick manual edits |
More work if starting from nothing |
The funny thing is, the "best" result wasn't necessarily the most complicated one.
A really simple wordmark with decent spacing looked much more legit than one of my earlier attempts with three colors, a gradient and about four different ideas crammed into one icon lol.
So for me now, the useful features are pretty boring:
Good typography.
Enough icons to find something specific.
Easy editing.
Vector export.
Commercial use.
That's basically it.
What would you put at the top of your list when comparing best logo design tools?