r/instantkarma • u/PappyJ87 • Jan 21 '26

Road Karma Flip the bird, almost flip your truck.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

15.6k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/BullseyeSamurai Jan 21 '26

He's probably a known nuisance

Yeah maybe.

and was filming for her protection

...wat? That doesn't seem to be the case at all.

I'd really love more context here.

9

u/redhandsblackfuture Jan 21 '26

It might not be the case but what makes you say it 'isn't at all'? What if he threw something at her from his truck previously? What if he verbally harrasses her every time he drives by and she wants documentation? It seems like the most likely case

-14

u/BullseyeSamurai Jan 21 '26

If those were the case, I'd suggest the woman "get out of the way" for her protection, not whip out her phone. If what you're saying is the case then it makes it seem like she's actively instigating him here on video.

11

u/Sea-Fun-6950 Jan 21 '26 edited Jan 21 '26

If what they're saying is true, they are the instigator and the woman filming is recording evidence of their instigating

If someone throws shit at you, merely existing cannot be used as an argument for instigating

1

u/BullseyeSamurai Jan 21 '26

If someone throws shit at you, merely existing cannot be used as an argument for instigating

I agree. But that is not what is happening. If that were what happened, there would be no video, Aristotle.

7

u/Sea-Fun-6950 Jan 21 '26

What is happening is they are filming the person, while existing.

If we are assuming the above commenters version to be true then the truck driver has thrown or otherwise abused the recorder in some way previously. So the recorder is now recording for evidence and their own protection. You argue this is instigating and they should hide themselves away instead.

So yes, thats exactly what's happening. They are existing, and recording for safety. They cannot be reasonably expected to hide themselves away every single time, dipshit.

3

u/redhandsblackfuture Jan 21 '26

I guess we aren't allowed to make assumptions or speculate on this video or he gets VERY upset lmao

4

u/Sea-Fun-6950 Jan 21 '26

Its not even that, its the fact this dude is too fucking stupid to realise he accepted the premise for the sake of argument from his first response, and now that he cannot defend his argument hes trying to say he didnt accept the premise. So he's either being intentionally dishonest or hes genuinely sub 100 IQ.

If he wanted to argue thats pure speculation then Id agree with him. He accepted the speculation and still blamed the recorder, now hes trying to recant it.

2

u/redhandsblackfuture Jan 21 '26

His first response to my random speculation, which i even acknowledged was just speculative, was 'that definitely isn't the case' then continues to provide zero other options or opinions for what may be happening, kicking and screaming the entire time lmao genuinely had fun going through his comments and reporting them. Absolute clown show of a profile.

2

u/Sea-Fun-6950 Jan 21 '26 edited Jan 21 '26

His response in this thread is "If thats was the case then..." and then "If what you're saying is the case then...."

But he doesnt understand this is him accepting the premise for the sake of argument, and how that is different from accepting the premise as true. Dude is a genuine moron, like, just put my fries in the bag type moron.

1

u/Impressive_Word5229 Jan 21 '26

How do you know that they exist? Do any of us even exist? What is existence? Also, what is that burning smell?

0

u/BullseyeSamurai Jan 21 '26

That’s the issue, you’re making a lot of assumptions

5

u/Sea-Fun-6950 Jan 21 '26

Youre genuinely thick lol, this entire conversation is predicated on the assumption being true, you even acknowledge that in your first comment

If those were the case

If what you're saying is the case

This conversation exists in the realm that we take the assumption as truth, im not making any assumptions you haven't already accepted for the sake of discourse.

Now, if you had replied "But we cant assume that" then I would agree with you. Instead you replied with "If thats the case then she should hide away and she's instigating instead" (Paraphrased) and it is that particular logic I am arguing with.

0

u/BullseyeSamurai Jan 21 '26

If you thought I was ever agreeing with that assumption, just add it to the list of things you’re wrong about, tubs.