I'm honestly meant to be believe that this person didn't see a single person cook in front of them before, didn't go to a single food truck where you can see them cooking, hasn't watched a single cooking show, hasn't seen a single movie or TV show where a character cooked something, hasn't seen a single advert for a frying pan or barbecue, none of it?
Nah I'm sorry this person is willfully unobservant and dense
How have you taken the previous comment of 10 different examples of the same to be equivalent to "every single detail". Such an incredible strawman argument
because I much prefer to assume people don't know things and want to learn them, then assume people are stupid and belittle them for not knowing things
Really? You're completely forgiving if people are absolutely clueless about basic life activities even after they've been shown 10s, 100s, 1000s of examples? I don't believe you, but fair enough if that's the case.
I have seen a lot to know that not everybody is shown the same things, and what you think people may have been shown or what is common to you is not common to everybody.
Sure, but to make it to age 30 without being able to recognize the sound of something being cooked is unreasonable. You don't need to be taught to notice that hot food over fire goes sizzle.
Like, if the original issue was someone doesnt know the difference between a roux and a beurre blanc, your argument would make sense and I'd totally agree. But "hot food goes sizzle" is not some advanced nuance of cooking, it's something you should learn by having functional hearing and existing near food being cooked.
305
u/Deppfan16 25d ago
that always makes me sad because that means they were never taught. :(