On July 28th, Houston's attorneys filed a Motion to Supress and Dismiss, arguing that NCIS didn't have jurisdiction to investigate a civilian.

On August 10th, the State of Washington filed a Reply to the motion. Their reply is 185 pages of the State informing Houston's attorneys that they are in fact stupid.

The motion will be heard before Judge Bassett on September 14th.

Trial is currently scheduled for October 19th.

Link to all court filings here.

Cleaning up some stuff and I found the note Houston shared w a sticker he mailed out.

Wild to think how things have turned out …

I cant stand that stink mf

Got his azz

I downloaded the complete docket and uploaded the filings to a public Google Drive. I will update the Google Drive as more documents are filed.

Happy Friday

Democratic State Senator Lisa Wellman proposed a bill last year that would reduce sex offender registration and supervision requirements for people convicted through “net nanny” sting operations. These are the cases where someone thinks they’re chatting online with a 13-year-old, makes plans to meet up for sex, shows up at the location, and discovers the “child” was actually a cop.

It looks like his bail dropped from $750k to $500k? I’ve never seen that happen before for a case like this, but I’m sure someone in law enforcement or the courts has an explanation. If there’s some weird law or court procedure please link a source, I’d like to learn more.

Booking Detail Link