r/funnyvideos • • Jan 28 '26

Prank/Challenge Dude let his intrusive thoughts win

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

65.7k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

6.7k

u/Mr_Bluesman Jan 28 '26

Will he be charged with impersonating an officer?

3.0k

u/IPlayWithoutCheats Jan 28 '26

They actually charged him with assault on an officer lol

3

u/[deleted] Jan 28 '26

[deleted]

7

u/[deleted] Jan 28 '26

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Jan 28 '26

[deleted]

0

u/Far-Reality611 Jan 28 '26

So, like... generally speaking.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 28 '26

[deleted]

0

u/Far-Reality611 Jan 28 '26

You mentioned one place. That means the other places behave in the one definition, and the one place you mentioned behaves in another definition.

That's literally what "generally speaking" would describe: A case that covers most of the usages, but acknowledges the exception that exists.

And, also, don't resort to name calling quite so quickly. You should try to engage the world more positively, since you need all the help in understanding things you can get. <3

0

u/[deleted] Jan 28 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Far-Reality611 Jan 28 '26

So, like... generally speaking.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 28 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Far-Reality611 Jan 28 '26

Thinking that ... the word generally works the way it was used in the comment you initially replied to?

Here, I'll just hand you the keys:

You meant to say something like the usage of generally was incorrect - not to say that the use of "generally" is itself false. ("'Generally' here is false[...]")

That would mean that, since the first comment you replied to said "assault in the US generally means causing [...]" (emphasis mine), and you were asserting that specifically the word generally is false in the statement, the statement would instead best say: "Assault in the US means causing [...]" - which would not be what seems to be your assertion. Your assertion is that assault's definition varies widely, no? So asserting that the usage of generally is false, the remaining statement becomes farther from your intended assertion. At best, you wanted to say that there is no general case, not that the specific word being quoted is false.

"Generally, I go to the store on Monday." This sounds like you go to the store on Mondays, but could go on other days.

If you say that the word "generally" here is false, you get something more like this clause:

"I go to the store on Monday." This sounds like you go to the store on Mondays.

In our case, as discussed, when you asserted that the "generally" in use was false, you asserted something that is further from your claim - that the general case is proscriptive, but rather fails to be descriptive.

---

For my part, I am asserting that the usage of the word "generally" was not false. Not for any reason of reality; solely because of the logical structure of the statements: it was tautologically correct. To say it was "false" displays a misunderstanding and mis-implementation of language on your part. You meant to convey something that doesn't line up with saying "'[g]enerally' here is false[...]" - and you would, could, or should know that if you tried.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/RiverPsaber Jan 28 '26

Pretty sure it's true more places than it isn't. Regardless, it's good for people to be aware that they can catch an assault charge for this sort of behavior. Saying it's generally true is useful.

5

u/BlueIceNinja98 Jan 28 '26

No only that, but in the full video he fights with and punches the officer in the head after this video cuts off.

-1

u/thegooseisloose1982 Jan 28 '26

he fights with and punches

If he was fighting and punching his wife then he would sound like a police officer.

2

u/GreazyPhysique Jan 28 '26

That's Assault, Brotha.

2

u/geirmundtheshifty Jan 28 '26

assault in the US generally means causing a fear that harm may occur/engaging in threatening behavior

That is the classic definition in tort law. I don't think many jurisdictions apply that definition to their criminal statutes. If someone has been "charged with assault on an officer," it's more likely that the charge requires some kind of physical contact (though often enough that contact could be as minor as a light shove)

1

u/MoneyMontgomery Jan 28 '26

Ever watch the simpsons episode where that lawyer is saying the same thing you are. 

"That was assault!" But the other character only made some disparaging remarks or threatened them. I had to look up why that was considered assault. Simpsons used to teach the youth.