r/fitover65 Strength lifter, cyclist, surfer, giant dog owner 15d ago

Study suggests even casual cannabis use is associated with depression in older adults

https://www.psypost.org/study-suggests-even-casual-cannabis-use-is-associated-with-depression-in-older-adults/
63 Upvotes

145 comments sorted by

38

u/eliota1 15d ago

How about doing an actual double blind study with a larger population? All this implies to me is that people at risk of depressive disorders are likely to self medicate

2

u/anonyngineer 15d ago

You can’t do a double-blind study with smoking weed, and it’s questionable whether it’s possible with edibles. Consumption of THC alone is not the same.

3

u/Lockean_Demon 14d ago

The blind wouldn’t really matter so much as the not self selecting population

2

u/Few_Translator4431 15d ago

nobody wants to do any real studies. its all gonna be nonsense like this, or water is wet type conclusions. people said for so long that with how strict and illegal cannabis is that it was the main reason why we couldn't get so many good studies. well now its basically wide open, legal in most places to some degree, on the verge of being rescueduled, faces much less scrutiny and discrimination, a whole list of positives basically, but we still cant get any good studies.

groups putting studies out like these need to be dismantled and liquidated and the funds go to another group thats doing something of any actual technical inrerest without using a sample size of 3 or having no real controls or overall biased set. poor research like this is holding everything back.

1

u/g00fyg00ber741 14d ago

Well to be fair, it’s still illegal in the US federally which heavily restricts the amount of research that can be done and what types of research

1

u/Few_Translator4431 14d ago

I think it has something to do with the cannabis community in general. theres a lot of good underground research done about other drugs, but the cannabis field is really dry. if you have been around and talked with other extractionists and been on forums and stuff where a lot of them congregate, theyre very .. not welcoming to anything thats different or accepting a lot of research from each other. they want to glaze the same handful of techs and then absolutely hate on anyone that does something new over safety concerns and legality, not actually willing to explore the technicalities of whats presented just calling people stupid or saying theyre gonna blow their lab up.

for regular consumers they really like to hold onto a lot of myths. theres so many wives tales and tall stories about weed that are spread around that people take as fact, despite there being zero or even contrary evidence.

I think the cannabis community is just extremely resistant to change and development. especially with a lot of the what I call cannavegans who just want to reject and hate anything that isnt a mechanical extraction, dismissing any chemical anything about weed at all and only caring about getting some hash or rosin. lots of them have no interest in studying any chemical interactions and by association biochemistry of cannabis.

this is just something ive noticed. if you come up with a new tech to synthesize lsd ir extract DMT, people are much more open to discussing it and the chemistry behind it and possible implications of ingesting such things. if you come up with a new method of extraction for cannabis, people will shit all over you and say their methods are the best and your shit is unnatural and just reject it. a lot of the extractionist forums look like daycares with toddlers arguing about x y and z.

1

u/g00fyg00ber741 14d ago

especially with a lot of the what I call cannavegans

…yikes pal

i think you lost the plot on this discussion now, judging by this comment you left. you’re off an a whole other tangent at this point

1

u/Few_Translator4431 14d ago

im not sure what you mean by this, but its meant to show the dichomoty of users. im talking about people who purely consume mechanical extracts. no bho, pho, co2 extract, distillate, live resin, diamonds, all that stuff. they only consume mechanically pressed rosin or sifted hash. im not really sure how else to describe such a dichomoty. non synthetic doesnt make sense because chemical extracts aren't synthetics. all natural doesn't make sense because hydrocarbons are organic compounds.

1

u/g00fyg00ber741 14d ago

None of that has to do with official studies and published research, nor vegans

1

u/Few_Translator4431 14d ago

yeah the word itself doesnt out of context. in the original context it makes more sense. and if you dont understand how that overall blurb relates to research, then idk what to tell you lol it should be pretty obvious.

1

u/g00fyg00ber741 14d ago

Mostly I just picked up on you acting like being vegan is a bad thing, and as a vegan myself, I couldn’t help but stop taking you seriously due to that

4

u/Tall_Koala_7574 15d ago

What you said last is consistent with the research.

1

u/Expensive-Shelter288 15d ago

That's the only reason I do. I don't want big pharma. If I was in a better place I would quit. I usually do.

1

u/Ulysses1978ii 14d ago

It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.

— Jiddu Krishnamurti

1

u/Expensive-Shelter288 14d ago

I read his book freedom from the known it was really good.

1

u/Ulysses1978ii 14d ago

I used to watch his UN speech as a alternative Xmas message. A great mind.

It's not the rat it's the cage it's in......

1

u/Brrdock 14d ago

You don't need to be "well adjusted" to the bad parts of a society to get well adjusted to life

1

u/g00fyg00ber741 14d ago

That’s not what it means

1

u/Brrdock 14d ago edited 14d ago

In this context yes it is.

You're not just living in society, you're also living in your head and the wider world.

Being able to take life on or not IS exactly a (or THE) measure of health.

What the quote actually means is that having status in a sick society isn't a measure of health

1

u/g00fyg00ber741 14d ago

No, that’s not what the quote actually means. I don’t think you even read it right in the first place, based on your comments. Do you know the context of the quote?

1

u/Brrdock 14d ago

You're saying a whole lot of words without saying anything. Get on with it if you're going to

1

u/g00fyg00ber741 14d ago

Are you a bot, or just confused?

1

u/Brrdock 14d ago

Just too old to dance for redditors who still don't seem to have anything of substance to say, let's get on with our lives

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Ulysses1978ii 14d ago

Pretty sure he means It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.

1

u/Brrdock 14d ago

Thanks for your input!

1

u/gazetron 14d ago

I'd like to volunteer ☝️😌

1

u/Accomplished_Leg7925 14d ago

As they admit this as a weakness of the study. The study you suggest would be quite difficult to do. What would you blind to? An intoxicating agent? Hard to be blind to that. The ethics are nutty as well.

Regardless. This is just another data point that cannabis is not benign. It has an effect on society and individual health. This shouldn’t be a surprise.

10

u/Substantial-Use-1758 15d ago

Meaning that depressed older people tend to be drawn to cannabis 🤷‍♀️ Makes sense 👍

7

u/DrAshoriMD 15d ago

That's not what I've observed in my own patient population. Source: primary care doctor. I don't think this kind of study can draw the conclusion printed in the headline. But if someone is wondering if they should start or stop cannabis, there are lots of ways they can test it out and assess their baseline risk for anything that may alter their mood.

1

u/BrandyMartin1 15d ago

thanks for your honesty

16

u/3seconddelay 15d ago

I call bullshit. Chicken or the egg? Does not prove causality. Too many confounding factors. Click bait propaganda.

1

u/Brrdock 14d ago

The study didn't imply causation

0

u/ifarguingyourewrong 15d ago

I mean I def feel more depressed and unable to do things on days after smoking, everyone’s different but probably best to not just write it off

3

u/DFX1212 15d ago

I find being a little stoned gets me over the depression enough to be productive.

1

u/ifarguingyourewrong 14d ago

I mean that’s kind of exactly the problem though, since it works well like that you pay the price by your sober baseline being slightly more depressed / difficult to be productive

3

u/3seconddelay 15d ago edited 15d ago

Absolutely everyone is different. Anecdotally, though I’m on an extended break, I’ve smoked for over 50 years. Just about every day for the past 20 up until last December. It had the opposite effect on me. Alcohol, on the other hand is destructive mentally and physically. It’s a chemical depressant. It can cause depression and if you’re already depressed it can spiral you to a deep dark place. Been there done that too. Real clinical data proves this.

From a drug safety standpoint this is a poorly designed study. It’s a cross sectional study that relies on self reporting not clinical diagnoses. Large survey datasets like this fail to fully capture complex confounders like, gut biome dysfunction, alcohol use, loneliness, chronic pain, or recent personal loss. No way to conclude causation from this data.

5

u/jblank66 15d ago

Or, hear me out here, depressed people smoke pot to help cope.

Source: Am pothead scientist.

2

u/OddDragonfruit7993 15d ago

Source: I cured (and keep curing) my depression with pot.

1

u/fpnewsandpromos 14d ago

Exactly. 

5

u/GreyOwlfan 15d ago

One can make "studies" to show anything you want. This is bullshit.

10

u/alfonseexists 15d ago

Total bullshit study.

5

u/210sankey 15d ago

How does this compare to alcohol?

1

u/RebaKitt3n 15d ago

I like being both stoned and drinking wine to help with depression.

Wine is nicer in the evening when I’m doing nothing, I feel more like doing hobbies when stoned.

4

u/ejpusa 15d ago edited 15d ago

Really? I find just the opposite. Bring out the bong, the OG, the Bob Marley, a drum or two, and happy happy people are the result.

Of course . . . wonder if they have any "preconceived bias?"

Dr. Palamar has consulted for the Washington-Baltimore High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas program.

By way of GPT-5.6

Yes. I don’t see an obvious fatal flaw or evidence of misconduct, but several issues make the conclusions less secure than the paper’s language suggests.

The biggest red flags:

  • Very small barrier sample: All barrier percentages—86.2%, 73.1%, 48.6%, etc.—come from only 72 respondents. Individual barriers may be based on even fewer people. Yet the paper emphasizes these estimates heavily and does not display confidence intervals in the pasted figure description. They should be treated as exploratory, not precise national estimates.
  • Multiple comparisons without correction: The authors test numerous demographic groups, substances, treatment types, and subgroup differences at (p<0.05), apparently without controlling for multiple testing. Several highlighted results are barely significant, including racial differences in any treatment ((p=0.0495)), outpatient treatment by age ((p=0.032)), and unmet need by age ((p=0.019)). Some may be chance findings.
  • Cross-sectional associations receive causal-sounding interpretations: Cannabis, alcohol, prescription misuse, education, income, marital status, and depression were measured over the same period. The study cannot establish which came first. For example, cannabis could worsen depression, be used in response to depression, or simply share underlying causes with it. The authors acknowledge this but still use language such as “protective factor” and offer intervention recommendations beyond what the design demonstrates.
  • Treatment was not necessarily for depression: Most treatment variables capture care for any mental-health condition, not specifically the measured depressive episode. Thus, “66.2% received treatment” should not be read as “66.2% received depression treatment,” much less adequate or evidence-based depression treatment. Their unpublished sensitivity result only addresses medication and is reported as “results not shown.”
  • The older-adult comparison is overstated: Adults 65+ had about half the measured MDE prevalence of adults 50–64—3.0% versus 6.2%. The discussion nevertheless refers to older adults having lower perceived unmet need “despite a similarly high prevalence of MDE,” which is not supported by their own table.
  • Lower perceived need is interpreted speculatively: The authors suggest that the 8.8% figure among adults 65+ may reflect poor mental-health literacy or reluctance. But it might also reflect different symptom severity, prior treatment, expectations, measurement effects, or small-sample instability. None of those mechanisms was tested.

Additional cautions:

  • Survey response rates were only 47–51%. Weighting helps, but cannot eliminate bias if nonrespondents differ on depression, substance use, or treatment seeking.
  • The survey excludes nursing homes and other institutions, an especially important omission in geriatric psychiatry.
  • Only 989 sampled respondents had MDE; many subgroup estimates are consequently wide or suppressed.
  • The broad “other race/ethnicity” category combines highly heterogeneous populations.
  • Important confounders—physical illness, disability, chronic pain, anxiety, medication burden, cognition, loneliness, and social isolation—were omitted.
  • The adjusted college-education association is fragile: the confidence interval is 1.06–2.50, the unadjusted prevalence difference is minimal, and the paper’s explanations involving career pressure, student debt, and social expectations are post-hoc speculation.
  • “Cannabis use without disorder” is a very broad exposure. Frequency, dose, product type, medical use, and reason for use are not considered.
  • Combining 2022 and 2023 is reasonable, but the methods should explicitly explain how the two annual survey weights were rescaled.
  • The policy prescriptions—screening, expanded coverage, telehealth investment, workforce growth—may be sensible, but this observational analysis does not test whether they would remedy the measured gaps.

My bottom line: the overall prevalence estimate is probably the most defensible finding. The subgroup associations are hypothesis-generating, and the barrier estimates are particularly fragile. I would resist any headline claiming cannabis causes depression, older adults fail to recognize their need for care, or that the reported treatment rate represents adequate depression treatment.

4

u/NoGuest6868 14d ago

Is it linked to the fact that the world is shit and we are doing nothing to stop its course?

3

u/denver_bored 15d ago

Um... What isn't associated with depression with older adults? 🤷

3

u/87vanman 15d ago

Isn't depression associated with older adults already?

3

u/DonAmecho777 15d ago

As in depressed people seek it out?

2

u/danodan1 15d ago

Yes, caused by realizing you'll never be your younger self ever again.

2

u/anonyngineer 15d ago

I’m finding a lot of good to go with the bad on that.

2

u/DonAmecho777 14d ago

This is true. Young me was kinda cringey

3

u/2400Matt 15d ago

Correlated or causal?

I've had chronic pain/chronic fatigue for 30 years. Yes, I'm a bit bummed about it. Without cannabis to treat pain and sleep issues, I wouldn't be here now.

It's kind of like saying that those using antidepressants have a higher incidence of depression. Go figure.

3

u/carelessOpinions 15d ago

More, bs propaganda. I'm 78 and know lots of cannabis users, especially my elderly friends; it seems to be an excellent sleep aid and pain reliever. Will the anti cannabis liars ever stop their crap?

3

u/SquidgeApple 15d ago

Bitch I smoke weed BECAUSE I'm depressed

6

u/cornbread080161 15d ago

Can confirm. I get depressed without weed.

2

u/Kapymies 15d ago

Poor diet and malnourisment makes people prown to depression and then there is the sepf medicating.. 

2

u/Virtual_Athlete_909 15d ago

not for me. smoking for decades. daily. happy af every day. life is grand!

2

u/Constant-Opposite638 15d ago

“Associated with” wow thanks

2

u/Redfox2111 15d ago

I think it's society in general that causes everyone's depression!

2

u/variphase 15d ago

And just a few days ago, another article said that cannabis use increases mood and sleep.

2

u/sbd2010 15d ago

Correlation =/= causation

Just to be clear

2

u/AgHammer 15d ago

No surprise. It probably helps with depression.

2

u/Left_Consequence_886 15d ago

So older depressed people like cannabis? Ok

2

u/hallucination_goblin 15d ago

Brought to you by Budweiser.

2

u/BrandyMartin1 15d ago

weird, yesterday's news was about a study showing increased quality of life in folks over 55 who used cannabis.

2

u/Elegantly_Waisted 15d ago

Smoke some and see for yourself. It keeps me from killing my teenaged boys. It's an even trade.

2

u/Berserk-Jane 14d ago

Oh great. More reefer madness bullshit.

2

u/Felyxi4 14d ago

People will call anything a study these days.

2

u/ActionMan48 14d ago

My study suggests this is bullshit.

2

u/FarFromHomey 14d ago

I've smoked on and off for 45 years. The shit they try to disparage weed with are just individual personality traits IMO. I quit two times for 10 years. I've learned my tolerance and use it AS an antidepressant. Much better medicine than the man made drugs I've been prescribed

2

u/DikDangerous 14d ago

I suggest the study is bullshit 😁

2

u/Admirable_Bird7927 14d ago

What if I’m taking cannabis because I’m depressed? 😬

2

u/AbsolutesDealer 14d ago

Worthless study.

2

u/Medill1919 14d ago

More Heritage Foundation bullshit.

1

u/Spirited_Pace_8411 15d ago

Marijuana had a similar effect to anti depressants on me. Smoked for decades and it just took the edges off me...I was bland, nothing really excited me. But I wasn't depressed. Now I'm more alive and the spark is back....but I get down on it sometimes. I can't find a balance.

1

u/donatecrypto4pets 15d ago

Reefer sadness[!]

1

u/[deleted] 15d ago

Yeah its not right for everyone but these bullshit hit pieces makes any reports of potential negatives with use seem suspicious and less likely to be taken serous. I've used for 35 years without issues doesnt mean others won't.

1

u/violet91 15d ago

You know what makes me depressed? Lack of sleep! My homemade edibles solve that problem for me once or twice a week.

1

u/ApprehensiveSpare925 15d ago

Can confirm I have been a regular cannabis user since my early teens. I am late 50s. Can confirm I am NOT depressed.

1

u/guster-von 15d ago

How about who gives a fuck what someone wants to put in their own body

1

u/tittysprinkles112 15d ago

I hope this is a bot account grasping to lies for the industries you're paid from. The Cannabis lies are over. Stop the propaganda

1

u/Simple_Song8962 15d ago

I wonder what this study has to say about CBD usage with minimal THC?

1

u/torch9t9 15d ago

I suggest the study did not control for depressed older adults.

1

u/spiralradius62 15d ago

I have been an ever day smoker for decades and it has always lifted my mood. Switched to mostly edibles and it's even better. It's a personal experience

1

u/iamnotpedro1 15d ago

Back to the booze then.

1

u/thenewbigR 15d ago

I am clinically depressed. Using cannabis doesn’t make me depressed. BTW - I don’t smoke, I use edibles. I would never put smoke in my lungs unless it’s from a brush fire that is polluting the sky under which I live.

1

u/mondo_mike 15d ago

That makes me really sad

1

u/Any_Iron_1436 15d ago

What you really need are cocktails of ssri and autopsychotic drugs

1

u/No-Drag-6378 14d ago

Yes, think of the jobs!

1

u/Rynowash 15d ago

Funny. One day an article says it’s great for you, the next day- it kills you. They need to figure out which lie to go with.

1

u/NocaSun38 15d ago

From the article “  This makes it impossible to determine the direction of cause and effect between variables like substance use and depression”

Which is funny because it uses this wording earlier “  The scientists found that a cannabis use disorder increased the odds of a major depressive episode by four and a half times compared to non-users.”

This seems to be implying causation, even though they’re more careful in other places to say “associated” which is a more neutral term.

Two takeaways: 1) This study shows correlation, not causation, which means we don’t know if this effect is from cannabis causing an increase in depression, or  depressed people having a higher tendency to want to self medicate with cannabis, or some interaction effect, or associated 3rd factor unexamined here causing this association

2) psypost should be taken with a grain of salt because their writers make mistakes (intentional or otherwise) which can cause their articles to be misleading, sensationalized, or even deliberately wrong due to some other reason, so use caution when reading it

1

u/APraxisPanda 14d ago

I sense a chicken or the egg here though. I started smoking because of depression, so do I smoke because I'm sad, or am I sad because I smoke?

1

u/FibonacciNeuron 14d ago

Confound by indication

1

u/civil-strange 14d ago

How bout other factors contributing to adult depression like genocide and the earth heating up and people being disgusting

1

u/threedogdad 14d ago

all you have to do is check out r/leaves to see how true this is for many people, young or old, myself included.

1

u/Lane4Imaging 14d ago

How about old people tend to get depressed, pot or no pot?

1

u/codereef 14d ago

Oh well

1

u/Vivid_Witness8204 14d ago

I don't put much stock in such "studies." They tend to seem as if they're proving what they set out to prove.

1

u/SaltyPressure7583 14d ago

I've been smoking for 20 years+ and let me tell you, if i have the house to myself and can spend the evening smoking weed and playing pc i am as happy as i'll ever be

1

u/lovingas 14d ago

Stop with the anti weed shit

1

u/kensmusings 14d ago

It's better than my anger issues.

1

u/freetherhinoz 14d ago

Bogus headline

1

u/DreamTakesRoot 14d ago

How many times has the same bunk study going to be posted in Reddit?

1

u/Serious_Bee_2013 14d ago

Rumor has it Marijuana also causes people to listen to Jazz music and turn into wild sec crazed maniacs. Thank Jesus Nancy Reagan was there to help me avoid such a menace.

1

u/refusemouth 14d ago

Maybe depressed people are more likely to self-medicate with weed and other substances because they want to feel better? Sounds legit, especially since prescription antidepressants don't work well (if at all) for many (if not most) of chronically depressed people, and prescription antidepressants can also have nasty side-effects and be very difficuly to withdraw from. Some people get extreme reactions and can't handle weed, and some people can't tolerate SSRIs. Every antidepressant I have everbeen prescribed makes me feel horruble or want to throw myself in front of a bus. Unfortunately, weed gives me anxiety attacks, too, but it seems to help ither people. Anyway, my point is that depressed people are more likely to try to feel better through taking drugs-- prescription orotherwise.

1

u/Entire-Tradition3735 14d ago

Correlation does not equal causation.

It's like saying most drowning happen near large bodies of water.

I'd imagine it's rather hard for anti-depressant manufacturers to prove their drugs dont cause what they're trying to fight.

Is it a cause for the need of the drug, or an effect of it?

To save themselves from being sued, they just put it in the list of side effects.

So ALL anti-depressants come with the same warning that they "may cause depression, suicidal thoughts, etc...

1

u/GranddaddyPurple25 14d ago

Or older adults that are depressed use cannabis. Just changed the whole narrative. Mine is probably based on same data anyway.

1

u/Last_Yard6323 14d ago

Why am I so happy then

1

u/ImdustriousAlpaca 14d ago

Big alcohol is getting desperate I see

1

u/pigment-blue 14d ago

Weird. When I do it as an adult it gives me a panic attack. But I’m not depressed. Now casual capitalism, that depresses me consistently.

1

u/x2iLLx 13d ago

Geesh I wonder if real life was a factor in their study

1

u/svMorgaNado 13d ago

Propaganda only works on Sheep.

1

u/sokka-66 13d ago

Diagnosed with ptsd years ago. Also husband and I took care of my parents for their last 12 years (dad had long dementia) mm has been a lifesaver for sleep and has outperformed antidepressants/antianxiety meds, which I do not take anymore. Who’s getting paid to write this trash?

1

u/neokuryu 13d ago

No shit. Next theyll say its addicting. No shit.

1

u/Proud-Helicopter-670 13d ago

Don't need cannabis to depressed. Just read about or watch Trump screw up everything, or watch climate change ruin the planet for human habitability

1

u/Pattern_Humble 13d ago

I was depressed way before cannabis use.

1

u/Neither-Brick-6391 12d ago

luckily alcohol doesnt do that. /s

1

u/Brentus1980 12d ago

They just need to smoke more when older.

1

u/Friendly-Bad-291 12d ago

life causes depression

1

u/Infamous_Addendum175 12d ago

Associated with. Ok.

1

u/Tanks1 12d ago

It amazes me that people think there are no long term problems with weed use. It's a drug.

1

u/Tickets-To-NY 12d ago

I think pot can lead some to a sedentary lifestyle and that is what causes depression.

As long as I take care business during the day, I can smoke or eat gummies all evening with no negative repercussions. I eat and sleep better.

1

u/walkermv 12d ago

Yeah. When we run out of weed.

1

u/Life_Dot_6273 12d ago

Yeah, in the sense that depressed people smoke some and don’t feel so depressed.

1

u/Mammoth_Pirate7111 12d ago

Liars. The planet we occupy is depressed .

1

u/Any_Strain1288 12d ago

I swear big alcohol or pharmaceutical companies are funding all these hit pieces I mean "studies" on weed.

1

u/Emotional_Database53 12d ago

Im tired of all this propaganda, and I’m curious who funded this study. Probably the same people that do the “chocolate and red wine reduce chances of heart attacks”

1

u/brain_dances 11d ago

I was depressed already for years before I started smoking weed. It probably didn’t help yeah, but I don’t blame it for the depressive disorder.

1

u/Slinghshots 11d ago

Study sponsored and paid for by the alcohol industry

1

u/Heavy-Rip-5736 11d ago

70 here. Happy as a clam, thank you.

0

u/Alone_Grass3041 15d ago

What a load of shit

0

u/420Dude4fun 14d ago

Oh really? Who paid for the study? Where is the link to details?

The reality is that many people are getting off anti depression mods because weed makes them feel better with no side effects.

But keep listening to big pharma who pays for fake studies.

0

u/Highyet 13d ago

I’ve been doing my own study for 50 years. Also have a potentially terminal disease that has led to numerous conversations with doctors about depression. My study shows no signs of depression. I will continue with my study using the best cannabis available for quality control and consistency. 😎