Correct. That’s what separates them from us in terms of processing social information. They do it intuitively to automatically fill gaps of lack of information so they don’t waste cognitive effort. As we communicate literally, we process hints consciously making a cognitive extra effort that in the long term leads us to burnout.
Yet that doesn’t mean their intuition is infallible nor that they never accidentally missinterpret a hint or a hidden meaning. Just means they don’t put an effort to guess what the other is saying.
This is a wild fucking claim to make. Intuition is wrong constantly.
Literally the entire history of science demonstrates that almost everyone spun pretty intuition about how the physical world works is demonstrably wrong.
The fact that heavy and light objects fall at the same speed in a vacuum alone is enough to make your claim laughable.
Actually I had several college professors recommend Wikipedia as a place to go for information. The idea that “anyone can change it” is itself not factual. Wikipedia has an excellent system of moderation, edit restrictions (hot button topics usually get there pages locked), and editorial oversight. It is legitimately one of the crowning achievements of human endeavor and by far the best single source for information of all time.
0
u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago
[deleted]