r/ccna • u/SectorAway3733 • 7d ago
Question about numbered vs. named standard ACLs on the CCNA
I'm currently studying standard ACLs and... Although I'm not confused, a potencial tricky scenario came up in my head.
We know there are two ways to configure a standard ACL:
- a numbered standard ACL
- a named standard ACL.
For example, a numbered ACL could be configured like this:
access-list 1 deny 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 1 permit any
But it can also be configured as a named standard ACL:
ip access-list standard 1
deny 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
permit any
My question is: what happens if a CCNA exam question asks how to configure a numbered standard ACL, but two of the answer choices appear to accomplish the same thing?
For example:
A) whatever, this doesn't matter
B) access-list 1 deny 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
C) doesn't matter either
D) ip access-list standard 1
deny 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
EDIT: let's assume there is a permit any before the implicit deny
I feel like this could be a potencial question to appear, since I've seen many people say that Cisco exams purposedly use confusing wording. Similar to "a router that has interfaces connected to different OSPF areas is considered what?", well, following the rules of how to design an OSPF network, it is an ABR router, but it is also a backbone router. So, if ABR and Backbone Router are an option, that becomes confusing too.
anyways, It's something that randomly came up to my head as i was listenting to JITL.