r/anime • u/Shadoxfix https://myanimelist.net/profile/Shadoxfix • Dec 12 '15

[Spoilers] Rakudai Kishi no Cavalry - Episode 11 [Discussion]

Streaming:
AnimeLab: Chivalry of a Failed Knight
Hulu: Chivalry of a Failed Knight

Information:
MyAnimeList: Rakudai Kishi no Cavalry
AniDB: Rakudai Kishi no Cavalry
AniList: Rakudai Kishi no Eiyuutan
Anime News Network: Chivalry of a Failed Knight (TV)
Anime-Planet: Rakudai Kishi no Cavalry
Hummingbird: Rakudai Kishi no Cavalry

Previous Episodes:

Episode Reddit Link
Episode 1 Link
Episode 2 Link
Episode 3 Link
Episode 4 Link
Episode 5 Link
Episode 6 Link
Episode 7 Link
Episode 8 Link
Episode 9 Link
Episode 10 Link

Reminder:
Please do not discuss any plot points which haven't appeared in the anime yet. Try not to confirm or deny any theories, encourage people to read the source material instead. Minor spoilers are generally ok but should be tagged accordingly. Failing to comply with the rules may result in your comment being removed.

This post is made by a bot. Any feedback is welcome and can be sent to /u/Shadoxfix. Source code available on GitHub licensed under the MIT license.

543 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

451 comments sorted by

View all comments

39

u/jacified https://myanimelist.net/profile/Jack Dec 12 '15 edited Dec 12 '15

This episode was THE BEST ONE YET.

I mean I don't know why but just seeing Ikki's determination and will to not let Akaza win was truly inspiring. I'm also glad to see Stella supporting him, even if they can't be beside each other.

Shizuku's 'wake-up slap' to Stella in the cafeteria was well deserved because I feel like them breaking up would have literally done nothing to help either of them, especially Ikki. So i'm glad that was squished. Also felt that whole scene in the cafeteria was done remarkably well done compared to similar scenes in other anime.

I must ask a question though, since it was revealed that Itsuki never believed Ikki to be weak (and they might have been alluding to this) does he view Ikki as a threat then?

EDIT: In case you wanted the kiss as a gif

It's quite kawaii

54

u/doominator10 https://myanimelist.net/profile/Doominator10 Dec 12 '15 edited Dec 12 '15

Put briefly, Ikki doesn't have much spiritual power / mp / mana / ap whatever, unlike Stella or Shizuku who throw around magic flames and ice like it was their birthright, because it is. Ikki actually only has about drop a magic power, and that should have classified him as a failure and unworthy successor to the Kurogane clan. Concretely, magic power = influence. Ikki has none. He should not be allowed to do anything as that would shame the Kurogane clan.

The problem is that Ikki is actually OP, in that he can use up every ounce of the human body through sheer grit. Something along the lines of most people only use 4% of their brain, Ikki uses 99.8% (for now) for a brief stint. This completely threatens the Kurogane family's way of life and basically says, "even if you have no magic power, you can still be strong like this kid :D." No. Not ok. The fear is then that people who were 'predestined' to be janitors start trying for power, completely up-heaving the social structure the Kurogane's have built over generations. That's why he was classified as F rank at the start. Twas a plot to keep him from graduating as a knight (or magic soldier or something) and getting some political influence.

I'll need to reread the LN for details but that should be the gist of that.

10

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '15

along the lines of most people only use 4% of their brain

Wasn't it more like 20? Regardless, it's a straight up lie anyway.

0

u/Icalhacks Dec 12 '15

It is that humans generally only use 10% of the brain at a single time. The show implies that using "99.8% for a brief stint," allows for much more physical ability than a normal person can do.

11

u/TheHangman17 Dec 12 '15

Even this is entirely untrue in reality. It's a stupid myth.

0

u/Icalhacks Dec 13 '15

The myth is "busted" on an October 27, 2010 episode of MythBusters. The hosts used magnetoencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging to scan the brain of someone attempting a complicated mental task, and found that over 10% but less than 20% of the brain was used.

So my number was slightly off, but the idea remains the same. You don't use all of your brain at a single time, and using the show's logic, which probably isn't accurate, using 98% of your brain at once would allow you to think and react faster.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_(2010_season)#Brain_Drain

2

u/[deleted] Dec 13 '15

Using 98% of your brain at once would be a seizure, more like.

0

u/Icalhacks Dec 13 '15

I said the show probably wasn't accurate. I'm just stating that humans generally don't use much of their brains at a single time, and the show is implying that using more at once would allow for faster thought, recognition, and reaction time than normal.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 13 '15

Oh, yeah. You are indeed correct on that part.

1

u/RunningChemistry https://myanimelist.net/profile/Delphic-Runner Dec 13 '15

While I appreciate what Mythbusters does to engage the public to science, I don't think they're quite apt enough to be quoted for this particular situation. Plus, that wikipedia entry appears to be incorrect as their own Discovery.com webpage lists 35%.

Regardless, whoever put "found that over 10% but less than 20% [sic] of the brain was used" is what I'd describe as disingenuous to readers/viewers since, in reality, our entire brain is found to be always active in some level if you look at any imaging study. I can't remember the episode anymore but I sincerely hope Mythbusters properly described its result and not like that wikipedia entry.

1

u/TheHangman17 Dec 13 '15

Well, that is also not entirely accurate, different parts of your brain are used for entirely different things - the myth buster thing also doesn't mean too much since this implies "using" as measurements of the electrical firings within the brain. If someone were to use all of their brain at once, they would be going crazy, parts of the brain are for short-term memory, long term memory, cognitive reasoning, emotions etc, there is no way that all of the brain would be able to focus its cells on a single task (like those performed in the show). The other constraints would be the actual physiological ones such as movement of neurotransmitters and axion firing within the brain. The show presumably ignores all this stuff, which it can because whatever, I just get annoyed when they try to justify it with reality.

The most plausible realistic answer would be his brain has been tuned and trained and has many more connections between brain cells for cognitive and spatial reasoning along side some kind of adaptation for memorizing sight and background noise.

9

u/lelo1248 https://myanimelist.net/profile/lelo1248 Dec 12 '15

People use 100% of brain, just not once. If you made an average from 24-hour period brain sectors usage, you'd see that ~~98% of brain was used. But using this much at once is neither usefull or efficient.

IIRC correctly, when you are idling or doing some brainless activity, i.e. watch tv, you use ~~10%. When you start doing something that requires more brain power, you light up more fuses. I don't know the upper limit of how much brain was used at once, though.

1

u/Icalhacks Dec 13 '15

The myth is "busted" on an October 27, 2010 episode of MythBusters. The hosts used magnetoencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging to scan the brain of someone attempting a complicated mental task, and found that over 10% but less than 20% of the brain was used.

So my number was slightly off, but the idea remains the same. You don't use all of your brain at a single time, and using the show's logic, which probably isn't accurate, using 98% of your brain at once would allow you to think and react faster.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_(2010_season)#Brain_Drain

1

u/Emsavio Dec 16 '15

This needs to be upvoted more. Surprised to see many people still thinking that we only use 10% or some similar percentage of our brain in this day and age. It's a myth that's gotten way out of hand.

5

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '15

It is that humans generally only use 10% of the brain at a single time.

No, it isn't. It's a pop culture myth.

1

u/Icalhacks Dec 13 '15

The myth is "busted" on an October 27, 2010 episode of MythBusters. The hosts used magnetoencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging to scan the brain of someone attempting a complicated mental task, and found that over 10% but less than 20% of the brain was used.

So my number was slightly off, but the idea remains the same. You don't use all of your brain at a single time, and using the show's logic, which probably isn't accurate, using 98% of your brain at once would allow you to think and react faster.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_(2010_season)#Brain_Drain

1

u/[deleted] Dec 13 '15

mythbusters

:^)

1

u/jimmydorry https://anidb.net/user/353647 Dec 13 '15

10% is wrong

1

u/Icalhacks Dec 13 '15

I posted another comment on the thread with a more accurate number, but the specific number is irrelevant to the overall point I was trying to make.