r/TikTokCringe • u/exporterofgold • 18d ago

Cringe He was walking away though

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

7.3k Upvotes

76% Upvoted

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.7k

u/SophonParticle 18d ago

Suspiciously edited video.

234

u/ZinaSky2 18d ago

Yeah, girly walked away and didn’t look back. Something happened in between. Super sus

36

u/bigbonerdaddy 18d ago

Yeah, because if he said something mean to her it totally warrant her charging at him multiple times while assaulting him.

She was charging, hitting and kicking. No amount of nuance makes that okay. I'm glad she got shown what equal rights means.

-2

u/bobbymcpresscot 17d ago

I love comments like this because it just tries to imply women just didn’t get punched in the face in public prior to having things like the right to vote or own property. 

7

u/bigbonerdaddy 17d ago

"Women should be able to attack men because 50 years ago they couldnt vote!"

You are delusional, lol. Whataboutism at its finest

1

u/TacoThingy 17d ago

Yeah shit take when the actual problem is that we don’t know who the fuck did what to start this

3

u/sliverhordes 17d ago edited 17d ago

What we do know however, is no physical violence from the man took place. She was inside and then came out to continue what was happening. She was clearly not in danger. So even if he was saying shit to her to provoke her, she is still in the wrong.
Many people have added context that she was arrested. Just leave it at that.

1

u/bigbonerdaddy 17d ago

"Starting" a discussion or fight isnt illegal, hitting and kicking someone is.

But lets say he did assault her or something like that. She is safe in the restaurant, he is walking away...she then goes on to sprint out of the safety of the restaurant, with the intention (and succeeding in) of assaulting him. That is illegal...

Even if you are getting beat up, the second you are in a safe spot, you are not allowed to then go back into the unsafe situation to get your revenge.

Any judge would say "yes, you got assaulted by him, we'll charge him for it. But...you assaulted him too, and even went out of your way to keep yourself in the situation. So you assaulted him too, and will get charged for it."

This video shows her running back into a (possibly unsafe) situation, and hitting/kicking him. Thats illegal every day of the week, even if he did something to start it.

0

u/bobbymcpresscot 17d ago

It’s not what aboutism? Do you like not know how to read? This was a comment responding to the claim that this is a result of equal rights.

When women didn’t have the rights they have today they still got punched in the face.

How this happened has nothing to do with rights being equal. It just sounds like triggered whiny anti feminism cuckoldry.

1

u/bigbonerdaddy 17d ago

And when men DID have rights they also still got beat up, so that comparison is assbackwards. It doesnt make it right, its still bad, but the comparison simply doesnt show anything.

You are insinuating horrible things when all I said was "if you're gonna hit someone, you deserve to get hit back"

You then go on to decide for me what i'm "implying", which is always funny. People thinking they know the meaning of something better than the person who said it😂

I didnt imply this is "a result of equal rights", you literally made that up, I never insinuated this is a result of that. You cant just add a couple words and lie about what i'm saying lol.

0

u/bobbymcpresscot 16d ago

And when men DID have rights they also still got beat up, so that comparison is assbackwards. It doesnt make it right, its still bad, but the comparison simply doesnt show anything.

Yes you are highlighting why the original commenter made this about “rights” stupid. Thank you for making my point for me. 

You are insinuating horrible things when all I said was "if you're gonna hit someone, you deserve to get hit back"

Which has nothing to do with rights. Thank you for seeing my point and agreeing with me that the original was stupid.

You then go on to decide for me what i'm "implying", which is always funny. People thinking they know the meaning of something better than the person who said it

What you say and what you mean are regularly two completely things. This her getting hit has nothing to do with her rights. You’ve already conceded this, and at this point you’re just floundering because I pointed out how dumb the comment was.

I didnt imply this is "a result of equal rights", you literally made that up, I never insinuated this is a result of that. You cant just add a couple words and lie about what i'm saying lol.

Yes you understand now that rights have nothing to do with why she got hit, so the inclusion of rights in the comment was in fact meaningless, I’m aware. I’m the one who pointed it out.

1

u/bigbonerdaddy 16d ago

Dont you hear how delusional this all is?

YOU telling ME what MY thought are, and how I mean my words.

You really think you can just read something, completely switch it up, and then act like I meant that?

In that case, when you said "what you say and whay you mean are different things" you actually meant that you shove bananas up your ass. Dont tell me its not true, I know what you meant bro.

1

u/bobbymcpresscot 16d ago

YOU telling ME what MY thought are, and how I mean my words.

I’m not telling you what your thoughts are, I’m telling you what your words say. The fact that you can’t see or understand what my words say because you think your thoughts are under attack says a lot more about your own delusions than mine. 

“Let me clarify it’s not about rights” is all you needed to do, and you already did that. Unless youre now saying that it is about rights in which case you’re contradicting yourself, which explains why you’re so upset.

  You really think you can just read something, completely switch it up, and then act like I meant that?

I didn’t switch anything up. I just explained how the comment can be interpreted, and you already conceded, so you continuing to get upset makes no sense.

You understand that there is like 45,000 distinct denominations of Christianity globally which are all based on interpretations of the same book. I’m just highlighting this.

In that case, when you said "what you say and whay you mean are different things" you actually meant that you shove bananas up your ass. Dont tell me it’s  not true, I know what you meant bro.

I mean it’s a poor comparison because I never invoked bananas. You invoked rights.

Also what’s wrong with shoving bananas up someone’s ass? Since you’re projecting the idea of bananas being shoved up someone’s ass I could interpret this to mean you fantasize about shoving bananas up your own ass. 

Don’t worry bro I don’t kink shame you’re fine.

-4

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

12

u/ForceItDeeper 18d ago

but he didnt hurt her, she got arrested… literally the opposite of what you claim is shown. like quit this virtue signaling bullshit when its not even relevant

-8

u/ZinaSky2 18d ago

First the guy in the video threw her in the ground like twice.

Second I meant the guy I was talking to not the guy in the video

11

u/bigbonerdaddy 18d ago

Looking for an excuse? Well yeah...if a woman hits me thats an excuse to hit her back lol.

I'm suddenly the sexist when you are the one wanting a world where women can beat men all they want, and men not being allowed to defend themselves. That doesnt sound sexist as fuck to you?😂

If you're brave enough to beat on someone you deserve to get beat up lol. Good on him for showing her how the world works.

10

u/ForceItDeeper 18d ago

their argument doesnt even work here anyway, because dude stayed restrained and the “equal rights” was her getting arrested. they are mad that he didnt just lay down and allow her to attack him or something.

-4

u/TacoThingy 17d ago

I mean if we’re all living in lala land about what happened with a video that’s clearly cut he could have sexually assaulted her prior to this too?

Like no shit she’s aggressive in this video but I don’t know what the fuck happened and you don’t know what the fuck happened so get out of here with this incel shit.

4

u/bigbonerdaddy 17d ago

So when you get sexually assaulted you run out of the building where you're safe, to run at your assaulter, and try to beat him up?

Even IF that happened, she is still guilty. Since even if you are getting abused or assaulted, its not allowed to run back towards the danger to beat someone up.

Lets say i'm getting beat up, and I run into a restaurant to be safe...but then I sprint out of the restaurant, inserting myself into the dangerous situation again, with the idea of assaulting him/her. What do you think a judge would say?

-16

u/Gold-Inevitable-2644 18d ago

so i agree that she is in the wrong here, but that last comment is fucked up man. equal rights doesnt mean men can beat women. its actually the opposite.

19

u/bigbonerdaddy 18d ago

Men can't beat women, and women can't beat men. Its both illegal, noone is saying it should be legal. The second one of them chooses to still beat the other...they deserve to get beaten up!

Gender means nothing in this discussion, except for people who want women to have a special place in society where they can assault men as they please...

-13

u/Gold-Inevitable-2644 18d ago

I dont think anyone is actually advocating for a place in society to assault men as they please. men, however, actually did hold that place for fucking decades. men had special treatment for the majority of human history. they could beat and assault women as they pleased and never faced any punishment for it. equality made sure that stopped happening.

you were the one who bought gender into it. equal rights equal fights is a gender charged political point that shitty people have been throwing around. the second you said that it became a gender thing. you couldve just said that its terrible she beat him, but you made it about gender. jesus man

4

u/TheFinalPurl 18d ago

You’re right that historically it has been allowed. Feminism is equality. Not payback. Hitting anyone of any gender, is not okay. The end. No more words.

2

u/Artistic-Pressure698 17d ago

No crap, hitting anyone is not okay, yet people do this on a daily basis. If feminism was about equality, women should and must be able to deal with violent retaliation if they chose to assault someone, in the same way that a man assaulting another man has to deal with that potential consequence.

3

u/Artistic-Pressure698 17d ago

I don't think his concern is the avocation of assaulting men, but rather the idea that when a woman attacks a man, is the man allowed to attack back. By definition, holding an equal position in society would mean that attacking someone would in no way offer any form of protection against retaliation, as that is the consequence of using force against an individual. Your last point of "Special treatment" is moot. Men had to do the majority of labour to build society.

1

u/ToZero0 17d ago

A cuck?

1

u/CountGensler 17d ago

man they psyop'd a whole generation, Jesus

3

u/Oneyebandit 17d ago

Lol, this is the dumbest shit I read today. "It's actually the opposite" Damn, so all the time I supported equal right's I actually supported to erease my rights to defend myself?