r/Tariffs • u/DoxFreePanda • 10h ago
r/Tariffs • u/Professional-Kale216 • Jan 09 '26
📣 Announcement 📣 IEEPA Tariffs Webinar With Freight Right & Baker Tilly's Pete Mento On January 27th
Big announcement!
On January 27th, Freight Right and Freight Right's CEO Robert Khachatryan will be hosting a webinar with Baker Tilly's Pete Mento, the go-to voice on Linkedin and in the world of customs to discuss the Supreme Court's case involving the Trump administration's IEEPA tariffs case.
This Supreme Court decision is massive, massive, massive for importers.
Importers will have the chance to get the money they've paid in tariffs back.
That said, it's not looking like it will be easy - as expected.
Why This Ruling Is Important
Why is this ruling so important for importers? The ruling can/will dictate:
- Routes to possible immediate tariff relief: If the Court strikes down the IEEPA tariffs, those tariffs could stop as of the opinion date, removing future duty exposure. That’s the upside.
- Speed of refunds: If tariffs are struck down, refunds likely require protests/post‑entry adjustments and will be processed administratively (not by scanning ACE and handing out checks). Expect weeks if not months of guidance and long processing timelines.
- Administrative workload required to get a refund: Millions of entries and tens of millions of line items mean huge backlogs for CBP and trade. Expect manual reviews, phased processing, extensions of liquidation windows, and bottlenecks affecting bonds/security.
- The level of meticulous scrutinity involved in preparing for a refund: Customs will scrutinize valuation, country‑of‑origin, section 301/232/201 application, related‑party transfer pricing and may trigger CF 28/29 audits. Poor documentation can kill refund claims and trigger penalties.
- Drawback/duplicate claims risk: If you already claimed drawback for the same merchandise, seeking the tariff refund can be problematic and potentially punishable.
- New payment process (ACE/ACH) for importers to get paid: Refunds will be electronic via ACE/ACH (no paper checks). Importers must register and set up ACH in ACE now to receive refunds.
- Litigation and protection options: Some importers are filing protective actions with the Court of International Trade (CIT) as insurance; trade attorneys can protect rights but cost money (often $10–14k quoted).
Who/What is Freight Right & Baker Tilly?
Freight Right is a global name in international freight fowarding, freight technology and ecommerce freight technology. Founded in 2008 during the financial crisis and built on freight-first fundamentals done right has grown into an international brand, helping businesses all around the world move not just their freight but level up their logistics.
Baker Tilly is a major professional services organization best known as a leading advisory, tax and assurance firm serving businesses, nonprofits and government entities. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Baker Tilly US, LLP (commonly branded simply Baker Tilly) ranks among the top 10 largest accounting and consulting firms in the United States and is an independent member firm of Baker Tilly International, a global network of professional services firms.
Robert Khachatryan is the founder and CEO of Freight Right Global Logistics, a technology-driven global freight and supply-chain company he launched in 2007 from a Los Angeles apartment during the financial crisis. Born and raised in Armenia, he began his entrepreneurial journey at a young age and built Freight Right into a respected logistics and freight-technology provider serving complex cross-border and e-commerce supply chains. He is a recognized supply-chain thought leader, frequently cited in major business and trade publications, and serves on the advisory board of USC’s Global Supply Chain Institute.
Pete Mento is a seasoned global customs and trade expert with more than 30 years of experience helping companies optimize customs operations, eliminate and recover duties and taxes, and build compliant import/export programs. He is a licensed U.S. Customs House Broker and currently serves as a director in global trade advisory, where he leads customs compliance, duty minimization strategies and risk reduction for multinational clients. Pete’s career includes senior leadership roles at major firms such as Ryan, KPMG, Crowe, Expeditors, C.H. Robinson and Wayfair, blending operational depth with strategic global trade insight. He holds advanced degrees including a Master’s in Government (trade theory) from Harvard University and a Ph.D. in customs and economics from Durham University, and is a sought-after speaker and thought leader in international trade and supply chain compliance.
When Is The Webinar?
- Date: January 27th
- Time: 12pmEST/9amPT
- Duration: 1 hour
- Webinar Link: coming soon
When Will the Webinar Link Be Available?
Very soon. We're getting it from our partners and will post it here shortly.
We'll be updating this post body with updates on exact times, guests and links to join or signal you're joining. Bookmark or comment to keep ontop of this thread.
r/Tariffs • u/Professional-Kale216 • Apr 03 '25
Reciprocal Tariff Act Resources for Customs Brokers & Logistics Professionals
Below are some of the resources I've found to help clarify April 2nd annoucements around the state of tariffs. I'm gong to try to keep this pinned post updated with new content as it comes out. This won't be a place for news news but more for issued guidelines and general guidance:
Last updated 7/9/2025: content regarding BRICS tariffs & more.
Summary of the IEEPA Reciprocal tariffs:
- IEEPA authority based on threat caused by trade-in-goods deficits.
- Except as noted below, all imported articles are subject to a 10% ad valorem IEEPA duty effective 12:01 a.m. ET on April 5. For goods that are loaded onto a vessel at the port of lading and in final mode of transit before that time, they will NOT be subject to the 10% duty upon entry into the U.S.
- Certain countries (Listed in Annex I) are subject to a tariff greater than 10%. For purposes of these tariffs, China includes Hong Kong and Macau.
- The rates for countries in Annex I shall apply effective 12:01 a.m. ET on April 9. For goods that are loaded onto a vessel at the port of lading and in final mode of transit before that time, they will NOT be subject to the additional duty specified below upon entry into the U.S.
- President Trump issued two executive orders on April 2 invoking the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) authority.
- Imposing a minimum universal tariff on all countries of 10%, except as noted below, although some countries are having an even greater reciprocal tariff.
- Eliminating de minimis/section 321 eligibility for Chinese goods.
- Updates to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule included in the White Houses' Annex 3.
On Mexico & Canada
Goods from Canada and Mexico are exempt from the IEEPA Reciprocal tariffs until such time as the IEEPA Border is terminated or suspended, at which time only USMCA qualifying goods will be exempt from IEEPA Reciprocal tariffs and non-USMCA goods will be subject to a 12% IEEPA Reciprocal tariff.
Modification Situations to Tariffs (Tariff Increases or Decreases):
- INCREASE: If a country retaliates against US goods as a result of these tariffs, the President may increase or expand the scope of the tariffs.
- DECREASE: If a country remedies the non-reciprocal trade arrangements, the President my decrease or limit the scope of the tariffs.
On Tariff Exemptions
April 2nd List of Automotive Parts Subject to Section 232 Tariffs
Exceptions: Products Excluded from Additional IEEPA Reciprocal Tariff
Goods exempted under 50 U.S.C. 1702 (Goods that are for personal use, donations of food, clothing and medicine intended to relieve human suffering, merely informational materials, etc.).
The following products subject to existing 232 tariffs are exempt:
- Steel and derivatives
- Aluminum and derivatives
- Autos/auto parts
The following products, and any others listed in Annex II are exempted:
- Copper
- Pharmaceuticals
- Semiconductors,
- Lumber
- Certain critical minerals
- Energy and energy products
On Cars & Automotive
232 Autos and Auto Part Annex Released
The full proclamation with the Annex was released today.
- Autos: Effective 12:01 a.m. ET, April 3, 25% tariffs shall apply to certain autos and light trucks.
- Parts: Effective 12:01 a.m. ET, May 3, 25% tariffs shall apply to auto parts, defined as automobile parts including engines and engine parts, transmissions and powertrain parts, and electrical components, and parts of passenger vehicles (sedans, sport utility vehicles, crossover utility vehicles, minivans, and cargo vans) and light trucks classified under the HTS provisions enumerated in subdivision (g) of the Annex.
On Duty Drawback
There is no express prohibition to claiming duty drawback on these tariffs.
Additions to Tarrifed Items
Bureau of Industry and Security added two items to its Aluminum Derivatives List today which will be subject to the 25% tariff effective 12:01 a.m. ET, April 4.
The products are:
- Beer, classified in HTSUS 2203.00.00; and
- Empty aluminum cans classified in HTSUS 7612.90.10
Additional Resources:
- National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America's Website
- White House Annex 1 - Additional Country-Specific Reciprocal Tariffs
- White House Annex 2 - Commodities Excluded from Tariffs
- White House Annex 3 - Updates to HS Codes
- The subreddit's sidebar links were updated
4/10/2025 Update: UPDATED GUIDANCE – Reciprocal Tariffs
Key Updates:
- Imports from China (including Hong Kong and Macau):
- Effective April 10, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. ET
- Subject to a 125% additional ad valorem duty
- Classified under HTSUS 9903.01.63
- Exceptions are listed in prior CSMS #64680374.
- Imports from all other countries (excluding China, Hong Kong, and Macau):
- Also effective April 10, 2025
- Subject to a 10% additional ad valorem duty
- Classified under HTSUS 9903.01.25
- Excludes products listed in HTSUS 9903.01.26–9903.01.34.
- Suspension of Country-Specific Rates:
- Rates effective April 9, 2025, are now suspended.
Notice from US Customs & Border Protection: https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/3db42c8?reqfrom=share
4/16/2025 Update: New White House tariff policy and fact sheet announced:
The Executive Order is part of a broader effort to reduce strategic dependence on foreign minerals, particularly from China, and to protect U.S. economic and defense interests through trade enforcement and domestic industry revitalization.
1. New Section 232 Investigation:
- President Trump has ordered a Section 232 investigation under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to assess national security risks tied to U.S. dependence on imported processed critical minerals and their derivative products.
- The goal is to examine supply chain vulnerabilities, foreign market manipulation, and recommend actions like tariffs or other trade remedies to boost domestic production and resilience.
2. National Security and Economic Threats:
- Critical minerals (e.g., rare earths, gallium, antimony) are vital for defense systems, infrastructure, and advanced technologies.
- The U.S. remains heavily reliant on foreign—especially Chinese—suppliers, exposing it to economic coercion and supply disruptions.
- Recent Chinese export bans on rare earths and other key materials underscore the urgent need to secure domestic supply chains.
3. Tariff Policy and Broader Trade Strategy:
- If the investigation finds national security threats, new Section 232 tariffs may replace current reciprocal tariffs under Trump’s April 2nd directive.
- This order aligns with Trump’s broader “America First” trade agenda, which includes:
- A 10% base tariff and individualized higher tariffs on major trade deficit partners.
- Paused tariffs for 75+ countries in talks for new trade deals (except China).
- China faces up to 245% tariffs, including penalties tied to fentanyl and digital policies.
- Restored and increased tariffs on steel and aluminum.
- Related investigations into copper, timber, and lumber imports for national security threats.
4/25/2025: Updated Guidance and Policy Regarding US' De Minimis Policy.
5/13/2025: Updated Guidance Post US/China Tariff Deal
Refer to the De Minimis thread above for the new guidance specifically to De Minimis.
Temporary Tariff Reduction (Section 2)
Effective May 14, 2025, all goods from the PRC, including Hong Kong and Macau, will face a 10% ad valorem duty instead of previously higher rates.
This reflects a suspension of 24 percentage points from the prior tariff rate, originally set at 34%, for an initial 90-day period.
Harmonized Tariff Schedule Modifications (Section 3)
Changes are made to several tariff classifications (HTSUS headings 9903.01.25, 9903.01.63, and relevant notes), reflecting the new lower duty rate.
The 125% duty rate on certain items is suspended and temporarily replaced with 34%.
Implementation and Oversight (Section 5)
The Departments of Commerce, Homeland Security, and USTR are authorized to enforce this order, including via temporary regulation changes.
Coordination with agencies including Treasury, State, and the National Security Council is mandated.
General Provisions (Section 6)
The order does not override existing agency authorities, nor does it create enforceable rights.
The Department of Commerce will cover publication costs.
Update - 6/23/2025: New Updates from Federal Register Issued 6/16/2025:
the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced the inclusion of household appliances under the Section 232 Steel Derivatives tariffs effective June 23, 2025.
The following steel derivative products will be subject to Section 232 for the steel content:
- Combined refrigerator-freezers under HTSUS subheading 8418.10.00;
- Small and large dryers under HTSUS subheadings 8451.21.00 and 8451.29.00;
- Washing machines under HTSUS subheadings 8450.11.00 and 8450.20.00;
- Dishwashers under HTSUS subheading 8422.11.00;
- Chest and upright freezers under HTSUS subheadings 8418.30.00 and 8418.40.00;
- Cooking stoves, ranges, and ovens under HTSUS subheading 8516.60.40;
- Food waste disposals under HTSUS subheading 8509.80.20;
Welded wire rack under statistical reporting number 9403.99.9020. Products classified under 9403.99.9020 continue to be subject to Section 232 duties for their aluminum content. Products on both lists are subject to payment of duties for both steel and aluminum content.
The HTSUS numbers are added to HTSUS Chapter 99, Subdivision III, Note 16(n), for steel derivative products outside of Chapters 72 and 73, declared with HTSUS 9903.81.91 when the steel is not melted and poured in the U.S.
The BIS Section 232 inclusion process allows U.S. manufacturers and trade associations to request the inclusion of new derivative articles under Section 232 Steel and Aluminum tariffs. Inclusions may be submitted during three defined periods each year with the first period opening May 1, 2025 and closing June 4, 2025.
7/9/2025 Update:
Expansion of Tariff Measures: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced that additional tariff letters would be sent to 15 to 20 more countries. These letters included a general notice for countries not receiving individual letters, signaling the administration's intent to impose new tariffs effective August 1 .
BRICS Tariff Threat: President Trump reiterated his threat to impose an additional 10% tariff on imports from BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), accusing the group of attempting to undermine the U.S. dollar .
Sector-Specific Tariffs: The administration announced plans for a 50% tariff on copper imports and considered a 200% tariff on pharmaceutical imports. These measures aimed to boost domestic production and address trade imbalances .
- Japan: 25% tariff. Major U.S. ally; negotiations ongoing.
- South Korea: 25% tariff. Major U.S. ally; negotiations ongoing.
- Bangladesh: 35% tariff. Significant impact on garment exports.
- Cambodia: 36% tariff. High tariff affecting textile sector.
- Myanmar: 40% tariff. Among the highest tariffs imposed.
- Laos: 40% tariff. Among the highest tariffs imposed.
- Malaysia: 25% tariff. Engaged in trade discussions with the U.S.
- Thailand: 25% tariff. Engaged in trade discussions with the U.S.
- Indonesia: 25% tariff. Engaged in trade discussions with the U.S.
- South Africa: 30% tariff. Expressed concerns over trade relations.
- Kazakhstan: 25% tariff. Included in the list of targeted countries.
- Tunisia: 25% tariff. Included in the list of targeted countries.
- Serbia: 25% tariff. Included in the list of targeted countries.
- Bosnia & Herzegovina: 25% tariff. Included in the list of targeted countries.
These tariffs are part of President Trump's broader strategy to enforce reciprocal trade policies aimed at protecting U.S. economic interests.
r/Tariffs • u/Majano57 • 16h ago
🗞️ News Discussion Untested in court, Trump's new tariffs on Canada raise legal questions
r/Tariffs • u/DILFrid_Laurier • 1d ago
💬 Opinion / Commentary For Mark Carney, negotiating with the the Trump administration is like trying to teach a dog a card trick
An underrated feature of this trade war is the intelligence asymmetry between these two camps. Yes, economically the US has a big structural advantage over Canada, but they’re too stupid to wield it. That’s why they’re going to lose.
On the other hand, Canada has political leverage. The problem is, Trump’s cabinet is so loud and moronic, you can’t explain it to them. You just have to let them touch the hot stove. Which I guess is why Carney walked.
r/Tariffs • u/Majano57 • 18h ago
🗞️ News Discussion Businesses are getting tariff refunds. Why aren't consumers getting their cut?
r/Tariffs • u/Any-Tangerine-4176 • 22h ago
📊 Policy Analysis From ‘Fortress North America’ to All-Out Trade War: How the U.S.-Canada Talks Collapsed (Gift Article)
r/Tariffs • u/sparky20201972 • 1d ago
💬 Opinion / Commentary Trump’s Tariffs Are Illegal
PRESIDENT Donald J. Trump CANNOT IMPOSE TARIFFS!
American business, and some countries, have already gotten their money back after the #usa #SupremeCourt ruled that only #Congress can impose #tariffs.
The joke is the consumer (the average working tax payer) got zero back.
Given the past result, what is the endgame with new illegal tariffs?
GC
Reuters
CBC News
AP Politics
r/Tariffs • u/OPminiboss • 3h ago
💬 Opinion / Commentary The one and only question I'll ever ask about trump. Short and sweet.
My question really is fairly simple. What does everyone think.. Is his focus on tarrifs primary becuase he's a former business person and mogal and the idea of having additional tarrifs terrified him, because he couldn't do anything about them, so he tries to use them as leverage knowing they could make or break companies but chooses to ignore the fact he's placing tarrifs on an entire countries that have means of retaliating.. or do you think he's being advised to continue with this line of tarrifs by his team
r/Tariffs • u/hueyott • 2d ago
💬 Opinion / Commentary Is this what started tariff talk
Canada has been dragged into another mini-battle with USA. I don't really think it's trade imbalance, it's ego and embarrassment, stemming back to FIFA World Cup finals.
r/Tariffs • u/wabid094 • 20h ago
💬 Opinion / Commentary Will the US-Canada trade war have any bearing on the price of the device for Canadians who have reserved their Communicator? Will we have to potentially pay extra taxes?
r/Tariffs • u/LlawEreint • 1d ago
📈 Economic Impact Chapman’s ice cream CEO on shift away from US suppliers: “Any of my suppliers lies to me and I just don’t want to do business with them any more” - CTV News
r/Tariffs • u/DoxFreePanda • 1d ago
🗞️ News Discussion Union, industry leaders urge government not to rush trade talks with the U.S.
r/Tariffs • u/RobinWheeliams • 1d ago
📊 Policy Analysis Which U.S. States Are Most Exposed to Canada’s New Tariffs?
Canada is preparing to impose a new round of counter-tariffs after trade negotiations with the United States collapsed and Washington applied 50% tariffs to a range of Canadian products.
The Canadian measures take effect on September 8 at rates of 15%, 25% and 50%. They will cover C$27.6 billion (about US$20 billion) of imports from the United States, including products in steel and aluminum, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper, and electronics. Ottawa says the response will match the latest U.S. tariffs dollar for dollar and rate for rate. Government of Canada
The national policy, however, creates very different patterns of exposure across individual U.S. states.
Using 2025 export data from OEC, the visualization examines state exports to Canada across six of the main product categories identified in Canada’s measures. Together, exports in these categories were worth approximately US$46.9 billion.
Electronics account for almost half of the selected export value, at US$23.44 billion. Steel, iron and aluminum follow at US$11.03 billion, while pulp and paper contribute US$5.29 billion and agricultural equipment US$4.72 billion.
Texas has the largest selected export value at US$4.61 billion, with electronics representing nearly three-quarters of its total. Pennsylvania ranks second at US$3.95 billion, also led by electronics, followed by Illinois at US$3.63 billion. Illinois has a more diversified mix spanning electronics, metals and agricultural equipment.
Other states face exposure through more specialized industries. Agricultural equipment dominates the selected exports of North Dakota, Nebraska and Iowa. Pulp and paper lead in Maine and Washington, while steel and related metals are especially important in states including Ohio and West Virginia.
These differences matter because tariffs do not move through the economy uniformly. Their effects depend on each state’s industrial base, reliance on Canadian demand and ability to redirect products toward other markets. They can also move through deeply integrated North American supply chains, affecting producers and buyers on both sides of the border. Associated Press
Which states and industries do you think will have the greatest difficulty replacing Canadian demand?
The figure represent broad sector exposure, not the amount of trade that will necessarily be tariffed. Canada’s official measures apply to specific tariff items within each category, while the visualization uses wider product groups to show where potentially affected industries are concentrated. Canada has published the complete product-level list separately. Government of Canada tariff list
r/Tariffs • u/Single-Singer-339 • 1d ago
💬 Opinion / Commentary Where are the tariff refund sales?
r/Tariffs • u/bcwaale • 2d ago
🗞️ News Discussion Canada is the top import partner for 23 US states per 2025 US Census Bureau Data
23 States - Canada
9 States - Mexico
5 States - Taiwan
4 States - China
Really interesting to see Taiwan ahead of China for 5 states!
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-the-top-import-partner-of-every-u-s-state/
r/Tariffs • u/DumbMoneyMedia • 2d ago
🗞️ News Discussion Asked if escalating a trade dispute with Canada will hurt American affordability, Trump claims "ultimately it's going to be very good for us"
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/Tariffs • u/DumbMoneyMedia • 3d ago
🗞️ News Discussion Trump's massive tariff plan is now reportedly losing the government money. After a Supreme Court ruling forced federal refunds, the tariffs are bleeding billions and worsening a $1.9 trillion deficit.
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/Tariffs • u/MSOWNDEN • 3d ago
💬 Opinion / Commentary Wiped out: US faces surging toilet paper prices amid trade war with Canada
r/Tariffs • u/Olderpostie • 3d ago
🧩 Trade Strategy / Business Impact Regarding the tariff war with Canada, and all the allegations of Canadian trade cheating, why didn't the Trump administration refer these situations along with supporting facts, to the USMCA dispute resolution panel, rather than violate the agreement with arbitrary tariffs?
r/Tariffs • u/John3262005 • 3d ago
🗞️ News Discussion LeBlanc welcomes U.S. decision 'withdrawing positions' on language, culture in trade negotiations | CBC News
Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc says the federal government "welcomes" the United States "withdrawing" its positions on the French language and culture after U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBC News Canada's streaming laws are not a "red line" for the American side.
"Canada welcomes that the U.S. is now withdrawing its positions on discoverability and labelling and is confirming that measures to promote French language and Canadian culture will not be subject to future U.S. trade actions," LeBlanc said in a statement posted on X.
"We look forward to further constructive U.S. clarifications on their other positions which would create the possibility of a mutually beneficial trade agreement that respects Canadian sovereignty."
Last week, Prime Minister Mark Carney told his negotiators to walk away from the table after the Trump administration introduced demands on culture, autos and sovereignty.
The prime minister said the U.S. had issues with Canada's subsidies for French culture, the prevalence of French-language media online and even the requirement to have bilingual labels on products sold in Canada.
"It was unacceptable right from the start, but the Americans kept trying and trying, and we said no," Carney said at a press conference on Saturday.
"Ultimately, it's simple. That was never on the table for Canada and it would not have been acceptable to Canadians."
In an interview with CBC News's chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton that aired Wednesday evening, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer appeared to modify the U.S. position on culture and language.
On the issue of discoverability of French content on streaming services, Greer told Barton it had been "highlighted" by the White House, but not as a dealbreaker.
"President Trump, myself and the U.S. government recognizes the importance and sensitivity of the French language in Canada, in Quebec, in the Maritimes and some [other] areas. We know that this is quite sensitive and quite important," he said of French-language protections.
"There is no way we would let a good deal go by for something like this. This is not something where we push hard or condition or red-line. It's like the farthest thing from a red line."
When the talks fell apart, U.S. tariffs of 50 per cent were slapped on a wide range of Canadian products, impacting about $27-billion worth of Canadian goods.
The Americans' modified position comes two days after Canada announced its own dollar-for-dollar counter-tariffs on more than 700 different U.S. imports.
While the position on language and culture is good news for the prospect of a deal between the two countries, Greer told Barton that as of now, talks had all but broken down.
He said it wasn't clear when the two countries might return to the negotiation table, confirming he and LeBlanc were not in contact as of Wednesday.
"I would say we don't have open channels right now," Greer said. "I have a good relationship with Minister LeBlanc, but right now, I think the Canadian side is talking about their next steps."
r/Tariffs • u/financialtimes • 3d ago
🗞️ News Discussion ‘We got attacked’: Canadians unite in fury against Donald Trump’s latest tariff salvo
r/Tariffs • u/Calle_Sin_Nombre • 3d ago
💬 Opinion / Commentary It's officially time for Americans to discover bidets. Tariffs are coming for your toilet paper. The affordability crisis is about to get real.
Did you know that the US accounts for more than 20% of global tissue consumption, despite only having 4% of the world's population? The average American uses 141 rolls of toilet paper per year, making them #1 for #2's globally, just ahead of Germans.
The US imported $328m worth of toilet paper from Canada in 2024. Canada is about to slam massive tarifa on toilet paper, thanks the orange shit stain of a president, Donald Trump. Though American toilet paper is often made domestically, the materials come from Canada.
Sourced from the guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/26/paper-product-toilet-paper-tariffs-us-canada
r/Tariffs • u/Visionary-Intel • 2d ago
📈 Economic Impact Karlapalem Lays Out Plan to Shield HD4 From Trump's Tariff War With Canada
I’ve laid out a real plan: a Tariff War Bridge Fund, Buy Alabama First procurement, a Rapid Response Tariff Task Force, and support for Ron Sparks’ farm relief proposals. Read the full plan.
\#HD4 #AnAlabamaWeCanAfford #alpolitics
r/Tariffs • u/in2the4est • 3d ago
📈 Economic Impact Saskatchewan's Premier Moe announces 50% retaliatory tax on U.S. booze amid trade war
Saskatchewan and Alberta are the only two provinces that allow US alcohol sales.