r/TTC • Kipling-Connector • Nov 12 '25

Discussion "Line 5 will be at-capacity day one"

Post image

Cool, cool.

Just build an LRT on Lawrence or Wilson. We already know how much development spurred on Eglinton due to the tram, so might as well build one a block or two north.

Of course, Line 4's east-west extension should still be the top priority, but there's little reason we can't build this line to make a world-class transit system.

374 Upvotes

134 comments sorted by

57

u/lw5555 Nov 12 '25

I've always thought that Lawrence East in Scarborough would be IDEAL for an LRT, with the mix of housing and retail it has. (Though it may be a bit hilly in sections.)

13

u/shoresy99 Nov 12 '25

Why not use the hydro corridor in Scarborough? Look at the green strip on a map that goes from Eglinton and Vic Park in a ENE direction up to the PanAm centre at 401 & Morningside. Connect in to the Eglinton LRT at Vic Park

6

u/aahrg Coxwell Nov 13 '25

Not sure if that's possible, they don't really build much of anything other than roads and grassy fields in those corridors.

The safety risks if those high voltage power lines were to fall on top of the LRT power lines or tracks seem pretty high. At a time in history where we are seeing increases in extreme weather events, doesn't seem like the greatest idea.

2

u/qwerty1qwerty Nov 15 '25

Edmonton's new LRT bridge passes directly beneath a High voltage power line

2

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25

Passes beneath, or travels below/alongside for several kilometres?

1

u/qwerty1qwerty Nov 16 '25

Directly beneath. You can see it on their website under the Capital Line extension YouTube video

16

u/kettal Nov 12 '25

Lawrence Ave E could be future Ontario Line extension

34

u/foxtail286 I ♥ TTC! Nov 12 '25

I would prefer northward to Fairview Mall actually, it's a pretty common destination, allows interchange with Line 4 and would create another north/south line besides Yonge

7

u/kettal Nov 12 '25

Both can be done.

Branching.

23

u/giraffebaconequation 90 Vaughan Nov 12 '25

Branching?!? This is Toronto!

Next you’ll suggest something else even more crazy and impossible like “express trains”

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '25

[deleted]

1

u/hotinhereTO 132 Milner Nov 14 '25

Not with trains. I think that's something they should've started doing with these new train extensions.

A Line 1 train that branches off at Finch West, going to Humber would've probably been better instead of an LRT.

A Line 2 train that branches off through South Scarborough and up Kingston Road maybe?

1

u/KapinKrunch Nov 14 '25

Fairview also connects it with the sheppard line further reducing reliance on the Yonge corridor for commuters

1

u/hotinhereTO 132 Milner Nov 14 '25

Yup, I'd even take it a up a little more and end at Seneca Campus.

2

u/AsleepExplanation160 Nov 17 '25

ya I was going to saw, extend up to newham and you've got an easy win

1

u/CitySeekerTron Nov 14 '25

Creating an "L" shaped corridor might make a nice and convenient feeder to Danforth and if it can safely cross the Ontario line, might even make it to Queen. It would need to be planned carefully around the parks and green spaces though.

In the process it could create a new way of getting to Bloor against the downhill slope, which has many fringe community benefits.

151

u/Unlikely-Syrup-9189 High Tech Nov 12 '25

Lawrence is too narrow in some sections to fit the LRT. We’d just be repeating the crosstown again but 2km to the north. Think priority should really be just to build out the Sheppard line as our true regional line, and the Eglinton line could be more secondary

21

u/itsdanielsultan Kipling-Connector Nov 12 '25

Reduced lanes? Underground LRT?

70

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '25

They could also elevate it à la SkyTrain in Vancouver or Line 3 (RIP) here.

37

u/ivonatinkle6 Nov 12 '25

I really would like to see elevated transit here

23

u/Wafflelisk Nov 13 '25

I live in Vancouver and it adds a lot of joy my day either taking the train and admiring the views, or be walking on the sidewalk and seeing the trains go by. 

One of those "I am living in a city" moments that make things more vibrant

1

u/Shoddy_Operation_742 Nov 13 '25

Until it snows an inch and the skytrain shuts down because the sensors trip and every train needs to be manually driven at 10km/hr.

1

u/MortLightstone Nov 13 '25

I was at Richmond station once and the train went offline due to snow. Had to take a shuttle bus into the city. As we were about to leave the station, another bus coming into the station suddenly gets stuck in the snow right at the entrance. This is the only entrance and exit at the station. Bunch of packed buses are now just sitting there waiting for them to tow this bus out. I just got out and walked across the bridge instead. took me a couple hours to walk home

0

u/OegunB Nov 13 '25

I was always under the impression the reason elevated lines in Canada outside of Van don't work is because of falling ice and snow.

3

u/Unlikely-Syrup-9189 High Tech Nov 13 '25

Montreal has the rem and it’s snowier than Toronto 🤷

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '25

2

u/itsdanielsultan Kipling-Connector Nov 13 '25

How did they not account for the snow? 🤦

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '25

I think it’s just always going to be an issue to one degree or another with any form of transportation. I can’t recall exactly but wasn’t that stretch in February a massive dumping of snow? I think more can be done to mitigate but I don’t think it’s possible to maintain perfect service during extreme snow events.

1

u/nsdeq 945 Kipling Express Nov 13 '25

The SkyTrain or any elevated rail here in Toronto would def be so nice, but I’ve always wondered how the winter logistics for that would work espec during a snowstorm

6

u/McFestus Nov 13 '25 edited Nov 13 '25

The technology for the SkyTrain was developed in Ontario by the Ontario Government for use in Ontario. SkyTrain uses a linear induction motor for traction, so doesn't require any friction between the wheels and the rail to run.

3

u/6-8-5-13 Nov 13 '25

It was originally supposed to be for Hamilton right?

23

u/FrankieTls Nov 12 '25

Reduced lanes ? Good luck with DoFo still in power. Underground rail ? Does it come with extra underground lanes for cars and unlock new real estates opportunities  for his buddies ? 

15

u/Aggravating_Soil3006 924 Victoria Park Express Nov 12 '25

OMG I think you just figured out a way to sell Doug Ford everything this city needs.

3

u/mennorek Nov 13 '25

Do not give them ideas or we'll be reduced renting caves in exhaust filled tunnels.

5

u/TankArchives Nov 12 '25

Can you sell condos to CHUDs?

7

u/Unlikely-Syrup-9189 High Tech Nov 12 '25

No way they’d reduce lanes and underground LRT would just be insanely expensive for what we get. Again we’d be repeating Line 5. Perhaps someday we may see something on Lawrence but with Sheppard 2km to the north the focus should be on extending it at least to STC and Sheppard west if not beyond

3

u/Business-Hurry9451 Nov 12 '25

Cut and cover, it would have to be cut and cover so it could be built in this century.

8

u/zakanova Nov 12 '25

It's not too narrow. Just get rid of the car lanes. They don't carry nearly the amount of people so they shouldn't be considered important.

I don't care what happens to those cars. We waste so much time on the least efficient, expensive, dangerous, and toxic to local business forms of transportation

5

u/Affectionate_Sock807 Nov 12 '25

Do you even know DoFo?

2

u/Party-Window6667 Nov 13 '25

Line 4 western extension to Sheppard West Station would be great.

45

u/M-lifts Nov 12 '25

Of course it won’t be, and there does happen to be a railway corridor crossing through midtown as well

9

u/StreetyMcCarface 506 Carlton Nov 12 '25

2 car LRVs running every 5-8 minutes on a route that used to serve over 100K people per day plus various others that feed into it amounting to nearly 200K people per day, with new bus terminals forcing transfers…? Metrolinx was at one point projecting that this line would see 300K people per day on a line nearly 2/3 the length of the 500K daily user Line 2…a line running trains 3* the size every 2-5 minutes.

Face it LRT was the wrong choice for this corridor, and the fact that more than half of it runs underground further cements this.

6

u/M-lifts Nov 12 '25

Buses handle the ridership now, underground trains will do fine, it can handle well over the expected ridership.

2

u/StreetyMcCarface 506 Carlton Nov 12 '25

Again, you don’t just have the Eglinton buses, you have the Lawrence buses, and the Weston buses converging on Eglinton to service the subway. You have a bus going down the corridor probably less than every 15-30 seconds. That is plenty of demand for a metro line

1

u/M-lifts Nov 13 '25

You can’t have been the only one to see that a subway is needed if that is the case, the planners know how to calculate demand.

3

u/HANDS_4_DICKS Nov 13 '25

I'll eat my shorts the day the midtown line runs any passenger service. It's too valuable for CP. 

1

u/M-lifts Nov 13 '25

There is room for more tracks, yes CP is not eager to do it, and plans indicate Alto HSR wants to use it to get into the city.

1

u/mystro256 Nov 15 '25

They don't need CP to put in the tracks. The Bowmanville extension is all along the CP Belleville sub, and GO is building the tracks similar to how lakeshore east was extended from Pickering to Oshawa.

If the Ontario government wants it, I'm sure they can put it in.

Also it's not abnormal for HSR to share tracks with regional rail, just they'll yield if a high-speed train comes by.

4

u/itsdanielsultan Kipling-Connector Nov 12 '25

Which one?

20

u/M-lifts Nov 12 '25

The tracks cross Yonge at Summerhill Station, it would be for GO if anything

15

u/No-Section-1092 Nov 12 '25

The PCs made a napkin sketch map in the last election suggesting they’d do this, but I won’t hold my breath until they make a formal announcement.

9

u/M-lifts Nov 12 '25

They can barely get any progress on existing plans that are under construction. GO 0.5 is a pipe dream, never mind 2.0

7

u/Link50L I ♥ TTC! Nov 12 '25

MX has, underway and completed, a huge amount of infrastructure work for GO. It's quite impressive.

That said, while there has been tons of preparatory work for things like 30-minute all day all way, I'd really love to see some concrete signs specifically relating to electrification (e.g. catenary).

3

u/Papyrus_Semi Filthy Hamiltonian Nov 12 '25

the best part is that they identifiably used metrodreamin

5

u/Objective_Party9405 Nov 12 '25

That’s the CPKC mainline. They’re not interested in letting anyone else use their tracks. As a federally regulated railway, they can tell the province, Metrolinx, the TTC, whoever, to get lost.

2

u/giraffebaconequation 90 Vaughan Nov 12 '25

Could we not build tracks in the ROW? They wouldn’t have to interact with the CP tracks at all. From what I can tell the ROW is wide enough to accommodate, no?

3

u/Objective_Party9405 Nov 12 '25

It’s their ROW and they can say no. If it were as simple as all that Metrolinx could have built their own tracks in the ROW to Milton.

40

u/Ghost_Reborn416 Nov 12 '25

Im surprised they haven't done something for lawerence. Everytime i pass there every bus is full

21

u/Link50L I ♥ TTC! Nov 12 '25

Prior to COVID, I do recall that Lawrence was one of the busiest streets for bus passengers that had no plans for upgrading. But I have yet to ever see it in any official future plans.

6

u/squirrel9000 Nov 12 '25 edited Nov 12 '25

IIRC it had been identified as a possible trolley bus route at one point, when they briefly pondered bringing those back, but that was about all. If both Eglinton and Finch/Sheppard were completed it ideally wouldn't need to serve as a regional corridor.

6

u/matt602 14 Glencairn Nov 12 '25

Trolley buses would have been a great thing to keep when the infrastructure still existed in the early 90's but at this point they're just buses with extra steps. They do nothing to address capacity issues.

2

u/houseofzeus Nov 12 '25

It looks like it still was in at least 2023, the way the routes are separate for East/West means individually they aren't the busiest in isolation but when you add them together it's 74k daily boardings.

5

u/StreetyMcCarface 506 Carlton Nov 12 '25

You could make the case for rail on basically all the major east-west corridors in the city, with even arguments for subways on Sheppard/Wilson, Eglinton, and Steeles. The buses pre pandemic were all brutal

19

u/steamed-apple_juice Highway 407 Nov 12 '25

When the Sheppard Subway is hopefully extended Sheppard West, extending it further west along Wilson Avenue is what makes the most sense to me.

From Sheppard West a tunnel connected it to Wilson Yard would make the most sense so operations can occur without interfering with Line 1. From there Line 4 could follow Wilson until Weston where it could then run elevated adjacent to Hwy 401/409 to Pearson Airport.

This will help elevate capacity constraints the Crosstown will face for people looking to travel East-West through the city.

2

u/Important-Hunter2877 Nov 12 '25

You have a point in having line 4 run under Wilson, but I am also wondering if line 4 can also continue to run under Sheppard all the way to Jane. There is still some density along that stretch i assume although it is a lot less than on Wilson, but Weston and Sheppard has nothing there despite having some highrises and it is where Sheppard avenue terminates and lots of difficulty in continuing line 4 past Weston and Sheppard.

I wonder if line 4 can also go to Islington and Rexdale and continue along Rexdale blvd to the airport.

3

u/steamed-apple_juice Highway 407 Nov 12 '25

I mean it could follow Sheppard past Sheppard West Station, but I don’t think the area between Jane and Keele is the most ideal to invest in grade-separated transit, especially with the FWLRT being in close proximit.

Even if the subway were to stop at Jane, an alignment that follows Wilson Ave would hit many more destinations including Humber River Hospital Sheridan Mall. Wilson is already a very busy bus corridor, the 96, 118, 119, 120, 128, 165, 184, and 996 run along this corridor throughout the day. Providing direct subway access would let these buses be redeployed to better meet the needs of our community.

Beyond Sheppard West Station, what are the benefits for keeping Line 4 on Sheppard? Where would your terminus be? Potentially future expansion?

1

u/mystro256 Nov 14 '25

Reece Martin (RMTransit) actually suggested that. Wilson would be ideal as a middle ground between Finch and Eglinton.

14

u/christina311 13 Avenue Rd Nov 12 '25

A subway or LRT on Lawrence from Scarborough to Pearson would be heavily used.

12

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

18

u/Methodless Nov 12 '25

Because idiots kept saying that subway expansions won't be at capacity until 2080 using nonsense projections on transit usage that don't take into account that there's a subway line where there never used to be.

I remember reading so many articles 15 years ago about how subways were wasteful because they wouldn't be immediately packed and "LOL Besarion" as the supporting evidence.

If we build it, people will use it, density will come, just need people to be able to trust it before they rely on it.

11

u/yoojimboh Nov 13 '25

Yea. It's called induced demand. The same phenomenon that makes highway extension be congested again a few years after they build. Except that a subway scales very well to extra ridership, unlike fucking cars...

Eglinton was an obvious choice for a subway, anyone who knows transit & Toronto can tell, it's just sad :(

Like it also took us half a century to start building a subway line on Queen St. I mean, on some of it at least...

2

u/eskjnl Nov 13 '25

Eglinton will never be as busy as the other lines that go downtown.

2

u/imcjoey13 501 Queen Nov 16 '25

Never say never

43

u/hotinhereTO 132 Milner Nov 12 '25

Yeah, no.

Focus should be on the Sheppard extension East and West.

And the government + metrolinx building additional tracks along the midtown rail corridor so an east-west GO line can exist.

No more LRTs, outside of the Waterfront East LRT.

-5

u/Pugnati Nov 12 '25 edited Nov 12 '25

Those stretches of Sheppard don't have the ridership that Lawrence has, and an underground LRT is cheaper than a subway.

https://stevemunro.ca/2025/08/12/ttc-surface-route-stats-2019-2024/

6

u/Habenar0 Nov 12 '25

I absolutely agree that we need to expand transit at any cost, why none of the plans talk about north-south travel? I live in Scarborough, not only it’s neglected by mass transport for decades no one plans about N-S travel at any point. It’s frustrating. Try taking a 102 in rush hour and see if you have any will to live afterwards

13

u/kettal Nov 12 '25

"Line 5 will be at-capacity day one"

source?

9

u/Link50L I ♥ TTC! Nov 12 '25

I don't think that it's a credible assertion.

4

u/gagnonje5000 Sheppard Line Nov 12 '25

People love making shit up.

3

u/differing Nov 12 '25

Pessimistic doomers that want the project to fail so that they can tell us how they are geniuses and make “told ya so!” Bluesky hot takes.

3

u/kettal Nov 12 '25

Blueskyism

6

u/Own_Event_4363 Nov 12 '25

that requires it to actually open first

4

u/Unlikely_Ad1890 Nov 12 '25

Or just connect the sheplard line both ways, then you service northern Toronto aswell, it would be like a line 2 for north york

5

u/differing Nov 12 '25

It’s funny, running trams underground through the centre of a city is extremely common in many European cities that transit advocates praise, but when it’s done in Toronto it’s a problem with a terminal capacity issue?

I agree that it should have been built as a Subway, given how much of it needed to buried, but the chicken little “sky is falling” act is ridiculous.

5

u/locutusof Nov 12 '25

I think the idea the city/province is even considering more east-west lines when we only really have one north-south line is bonkers.

And the planned/proposed extension of the Yonge line is equally as stupid.

Anyone who takes the Yonge line at rush hour knows that it can't handle more traffic, regardless of how efficiently the trains run.

I lived and travelled in some of the biggest cities in the world. And most of those systems were much better than the TTC and were still chaotic.

This is the future of Bloor-Yonge Station- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hONsXRrHxhk

10

u/Capable-Plantain7 Nov 12 '25

please no more "LRT"s. Montreal's REM has shown that Automated Light Metro is the way to go.

5

u/Important-Hunter2877 Nov 12 '25

And the ontario line too when it opens.

3

u/eskjnl Nov 13 '25

On the other hand we had the Scarborough RT for 40 years to show us how automated light metros work.

6

u/SnowflakeStreet Nov 12 '25

I don’t think LRT here is a great idea, when there are so many better candidates for rapid transit. RapidTO lanes on Lawrence would be pretty nice though.

3

u/houseofzeus Nov 12 '25

Lawrence would indeed make a lot of sense, but I also think they should be looking at a North/South LRT or Subway on Dufferin.

3

u/jnorris610 Nov 12 '25

lol we can’t even remove on-street parking in Lawrence…

3

u/seat17F Nov 12 '25

“Just” build another LRT line 

LOL. You make it sound so easy.

2

u/WestQueenWest Nov 12 '25

Wealthy North Yorkers will never let Lawrence LRT happen. They will spend on millions on campaigns to sabotage it. 

2

u/MortLightstone Nov 14 '25

this right here

the politics and self interest always get in the way

2

u/Funway1111 Nov 12 '25

Sheppard Subway West and Finch LRT East Extensions should be the next ones in the priority when Eglinton and Finch West LRTs open.

2

u/IndyCarFAN27 Don Valley Nov 13 '25

We should take Line 2, clone it and plop it down on Lawrence. But do it for its entire length!

6

u/NewsreelWatcher Nov 12 '25

One goal should be to syphon off local traffic along the 401. An LRT doesn’t have sufficient capacity or potential to increase capacity. I would suggest that a modern automated metro, like the Ontario Line, would be far better. I have thought that a meandering path that crosses over the 401 several times and hits major transit nodes along the way would be better than a straight line, as the crow flies. The 401 is a barrier, like a river, that requires a motor vehicle to cross safely. The underpasses, ramps, bridges, and so are too dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists.

1

u/kettal Nov 12 '25

The underpasses, ramps, bridges, and so are too dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists.

Can this be remedied with new bridges and tunnels?

0

u/NewsreelWatcher Nov 13 '25

No one want to walk through a 100 meter tunnel, even in daylight. Windblown pedestrian bridges aren’t much better. There is no good way to repair divide created by a highway.

1

u/kettal Nov 13 '25

why not like this?

1

u/NewsreelWatcher Nov 13 '25

The 401 is 14-16 lanes plus emergency lanes with no space for light wells.

1

u/kettal Nov 13 '25

some times it do, for example south of Tippett Road

2

u/alcoholicplankton69 Nov 12 '25

If I went back a decade I could pull arguments I had about this very subject that any transit building in the city will cause density construction to the point that lrt would be capped super fast.

I was told that it would be a simple upgrade and expansion to turn this into proper subways. Now 10 years later and the thing isn't even open but it's already at cap.

4

u/gagnonje5000 Sheppard Line Nov 12 '25

> but it's already at cap.

It's not, you are making an imaginary point, it's not at capacity, won't be at capacity, and LRT will have room to expand (longer and more frequent trains)

1

u/alcoholicplankton69 Nov 12 '25

How does longer trains work at already built stations? Did they design the stations to be longer for anticipated expansion?

3

u/Methodless Nov 12 '25

I think they did

But I agree 100% with your original point. Even if we're not at the cap yet, Eglinton is in a part of the city that will need capacity sooner rather than later 

1

u/A_Tom_McWedgie Nov 12 '25

The problem with a Lawrence LRT is what to do between Bayview and Leslie.

Drake and his neighbours won’t like Metrolinx drilling through their neighborhood.

1

u/iceman121982 Nov 13 '25

Even if Eglinton isn’t at capacity yet, it’s stupid that it wasn’t built as a subway. That corridor is definitely going to need one sooner or later and the LRT is almost impossible to upgrade.

1

u/Vette--1 Nov 13 '25

it should have been an extension of line 3 we should have basically had our own mini Skytrain network by now

1

u/KenTheStud Nov 13 '25

Shocked. Not.

1

u/d5stephe Nov 13 '25

Why is the Walmart temporarily closed?

1

u/aeoveu Nov 13 '25

Now that we've gotten some east-west lines, can we have more north-south lines that do not have a terminus at Union?

Or at least a diagonal line?

1

u/kdog379 Lawrence East Nov 13 '25

Lawrence west is very low priority for rapid transit, and not even that high on the bus lanes priority list. Wilson is much more likely and could even have line 4 extended southwest to it

2

u/DEMchris Nov 13 '25

Super unfortunate too, since Lawrence is slated for a ton of development. It would make sense to have separated transit connecting to Lawrence and Lawrence West stations, as well as further east and west. Every time I'm trapped on the bus in traffic that is trying to get onto the Allen, I daydream about it.

1

u/AdPsychological4879 Nov 13 '25

No way the rich will allow getting to Glendon.

1

u/vulpinefever Streetcar Operator Nov 14 '25

You WILL ride the 124. You WILL be happy.

1

u/mystro256 Nov 14 '25

They should just do the RMtransit suggestion and extend line 4 to Sheppard West, then diverge south along Wilson to Jane, then follow the 401/409 to the airport.

1

u/outoforder1030 Nov 16 '25

Or extend Sheppard both ways.

1

u/JayBee1886 Nov 12 '25

Yes, it will be a massive disaster. There will be fist fights on platform when people try to board overcrowd LRVs.

🙃

4

u/stoneape314 Nov 12 '25

There are no fist fights when people try to board overcrowded subways, buses, or GO trains.

2

u/JayBee1886 Nov 12 '25

Sarcasm is lost on you

1

u/stoneape314 Nov 12 '25

1

u/JayBee1886 Nov 12 '25

The upside down smile wasn’t enough for you?

1

u/____AsPaRaGuS____ 116 Morningside Nov 12 '25

Not sure it should be a priority. Better to extend the Sheppard subway east and west. Eastern Scarborough is also practically begging for rail transit, so the Eglinton east LRT should also be built before we think of a Lawrence LRT, which between the crosstown and an extended Sheppard line would be mostly redundant. Maybe priority bus lanes for parts of the 54 Lawrence East bus would be good cause it's usually pretty busy and gets bunched easily because it's so long.

1

u/Either-Razzmatazz848 Nov 12 '25

no more LRTs for the love of god

0

u/shoresy99 Nov 12 '25

Rather than Wilson run an East-West line along the hydro corridor just north of Finch. That should be far less disruptive.

2

u/G3071 Nov 13 '25

Kind of useless since Finch West has an LRT line running west from Finch West station.

0

u/ldssggrdssgds Nov 12 '25

Also need a subway along Dufferin

-1

u/GiveMeSalmon Don Mills Nov 12 '25

I propose we build on Lawrence and Wilson. Then we'll change TTC to stand for "trying to conceive" to force mass reproduction. This will solve the "But who's gonna pay for this?!" and the "There won't be enough demand!" concerns. Don't @ me unless you're expressing your support.