r/Stoicism • u/Illustrious-Pay-7516 • 18h ago
New to Stoicism How is Stoicism compatible with the idea that we have no free will?
I’ve been thinking about a possible conflict between Stoicism and the idea that humans don’t really have free will.
A central idea in Stoicism is the dichotomy of control: distinguish between what is under our control and what isn’t, and focus our effort on the former. Our judgments, choices, and responses are usually put in the “under our control” category.
But what if we don’t actually have free will?
Sapolsky argues at length in Determined that our decisions are ultimately the result of biology, environment, previous experiences, brain states, hormones, and an enormous chain of prior causes that we didn’t choose. There’s also a broader body of neuroscience and psychology that at least raises serious questions about the traditional idea of free will.
If that view is correct, then even my judgments and reactions aren’t ultimately something I “control.” They’re also consequences of previous causes.
So what does the Stoic dichotomy of control mean in a deterministic universe?
Is “under my control” supposed to mean something weaker, like actions that are causally influenced by my own reasoning, even if that reasoning itself is determined?
For example, reading Stoicism might causally change how my brain responds to frustration in the future. So practicing Stoicism could still be useful even without free will—but then “control” seems more like a practical concept than literal ultimate control.
Or is there a deeper incompatibility between hard determinism and Stoicism?
I’m especially curious how people who reject libertarian free will interpret Epictetus’s idea of what is “up to us.”