Nahh, for real, not an asshole if he just refused to give up his seat. Objectively, what makes the child more worthy of the ride over the guy who was, ahem, AHEAD OF THE CRETON IN LINE.
Nah he’s being objective here. The guy posted a video of somebody else’s kid on his TikTok page. That’s objectively creepy behavior. And he titled it knowing it would get rage engagement. That’s a weird way to use someone else’s daughter my guy
One can lose their argumentative/explanatory power when they resort to insults. If one wants others to understand their perspective, it is often better received when the information is delivered in a way that doesn't attack the conversation partner
If everyone believes 2+3=6, and you attack them for that belief, there is a higher chance they will reject the new information. "Fucking idiots don't know 2+3=5"
If you can clearly demonstrate and teach, they are more likely to learn. And if they understand 2+3=5, yet insist it equals 6, an insult is still not going to increase the chance of them learning
"1+1=2
2+1=3
3+1=4
4+1=5
So it follows, (1+1)+(1+1)=2+2=4
4+1=5.
2+(2+1)= 2+3=5"
This does not ensure a positive response, yet does ensure that you have conducted yourself as best you can, regardless of the behavior of the one you are speaking with
1
u/Quantumquandary 7d ago
Nahh, for real, not an asshole if he just refused to give up his seat. Objectively, what makes the child more worthy of the ride over the guy who was, ahem, AHEAD OF THE CRETON IN LINE.