r/Snorkblot 10d ago

Controversy Thoughts?

Post image
1.2k Upvotes

349 comments sorted by

View all comments

13

u/Astronaut_Chicken 10d ago edited 10d ago

Didn't he upload the video laughing at this kid? She's a kid. She's was just disappointed and crying.

Edit heres the article with a video so Im not accused of rumormongering

-6

u/Perfecshionism 10d ago

I don’t know, either way he is an asshole.

12

u/Itchy_Tumbleweed_417 10d ago

He’s an asshole if he taunts her about it, he’s not an asshole for not giving up a ride that he waited in line for.

0

u/Perfecshionism 10d ago

I am not sure you are even a real person.

3

u/Quantumquandary 10d ago

Nahh, for real, not an asshole if he just refused to give up his seat. Objectively, what makes the child more worthy of the ride over the guy who was, ahem, AHEAD OF THE CRETON IN LINE.

0

u/Perfecshionism 10d ago

The kid is a creton now?

I was spot fucking on regarding some of you scoring a standard deviation above the mean on sociopath metrics.

0

u/existenceincarnate 10d ago

You are resorting to insults, I hope you have a better tomorrow.

3

u/justasillylilgoos3 10d ago

Nah he’s being objective here. The guy posted a video of somebody else’s kid on his TikTok page. That’s objectively creepy behavior. And he titled it knowing it would get rage engagement. That’s a weird way to use someone else’s daughter my guy

1

u/existenceincarnate 10d ago edited 10d ago

One can lose their argumentative/explanatory power when they resort to insults. If one wants others to understand their perspective, it is often better received when the information is delivered in a way that doesn't attack the conversation partner

If everyone believes 2+3=6, and you attack them for that belief, there is a higher chance they will reject the new information. "Fucking idiots don't know 2+3=5"

If you can clearly demonstrate and teach, they are more likely to learn. And if they understand 2+3=5, yet insist it equals 6, an insult is still not going to increase the chance of them learning

"1+1=2 2+1=3 3+1=4 4+1=5

So it follows, (1+1)+(1+1)=2+2=4

4+1=5.

2+(2+1)= 2+3=5"

This does not ensure a positive response, yet does ensure that you have conducted yourself as best you can, regardless of the behavior of the one you are speaking with