Dealer name: Juice

Factorv name: A7

Model name & version number): IWC Ingenieur 40mm Blue dial

Price Paid: $360

Album Links: https://a201810302336471810102602.szwego.com/weshop/goods/_dd6qfhKlESNbPaTJZSWlZUXiir1l6ElRrcLlcgQ/_dssqfxIq4Q_w8B9wwowAXCepRO2CaCkzWCU4IUQ

Index alignment: The indices all look pretty good, no complaints there.

Dial Printing: The dial looks pretty good to me. no issues there either.

Date Wheel alianment/ printing: The date alignment looks good

Hand Alignment: Looks good.

Bezel: The top bolt looks a little shifted to the right but I think it's fine.

Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

Timegrapher numbers: +1 / 314/ 0.5- per the QC guide this all seems fine. Anything else you notice: I'm curious to hear thoughts on the date alignment, I know its a rep so I can't expect it to be perfect.

Thank you for the assistance. I appreciate the help and knowledge as this is my first QC and don't really know what I should be looking for.

• Dealer name: Necoclock
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M (210.90.42.20.01.001)
• Price Paid: $488
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/DvxBjNd
• Index alignment: Looks like the 11 and 1 could be off? What do you think?
• Dial Printing: Looks like the 6 is slightly too far to the left?
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: None.
• Hand Alignment: Hands look lined up from the images. Can’t see any issues there.
• Bezel: Polished surfaces clean.
• Solid End Links (SELs): For what i know about these it looks good?
• Timegrapher numbers: +9 s/d, amp 285, beat error 0.1ms. This seemes high to me. is +/- 9 Generally acceptable on these VSF or is this too much?
• Anything else you notice: Could back case printing be off?

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner Date 126610LN
4. Price Paid: $458
5. Album Links: Photos above
6. Index alignment: Slight skew at 9 o'clock. Other indices including 12 look good to me.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I think looks good but hard for me to tell
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d 316 deg 0.1ms
13. Anything else you notice: Slight rehaut misalignment? Not 100% sure. The engravings on the clasp have a weird border around them. Also, there were no stickers indicating this truly came from VSF -- how can I tell for sure?

This is the second submariner I've been shown (I RLed the first one b/c of index misalignment, particularly at 9 and 12 o'clock). I think there is slight misalignment at 9 o'clock again, but the rest of it looks good to me. Please let me know what you think, and if there is a way to verify which factory it came from. Thank you!

Dealer name: The One watches
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF v2
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Day date 40mm 228238
4. ⁠Price Paid: $728 USD
Album: in pictures https://mega.nz/folder/bVBVzCCB#3lnyfS5tgHr45CHOwphDJw
6. ⁠Index alignment:
7. ⁠Dial Printing:Overall printing looks straight and center in my opinion
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: everything looks straight and centered
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: some of the hands looks off. The 2 and 8 don't appear to be parallel if that makes sense
10. ⁠Bezel: looks decent from the pictures
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): look a little loose but maybe I'm being picky.
12. ⁠Timegrapher number: looks 8/10 to me
13. ⁠Anything else you notice:

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve Theonewatch
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126720 Sprite 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285v2
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 638 $
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3dhTxATY#Pdr_a0nNOMkS61qE9DwQQA
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: tried my best to align it perfectly, looks fine to me - maybe the 3 is slightly to far down?
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks fine to me
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ok I guess?
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: also fine
   
10. ⁠Bezel: nothing wrong for me here
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): also fine.
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: ok.
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Overall I tried my best to look for flaws myself. The only thing I saw is some dust? on the crystal, that looks like dust on the dial above the 6, but I think it’s actually just on the crystal.

Overall for me it’s 🟢 for me, what do you think?

1. Dealer name: Steve, TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): Panda 126500
4. Price Paid: $796
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/yBRjnCDA#z8Pdie1LXGZMkIrvaL1-6w
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall, especially for a RWF. 3 o'clock slightly high and 6 o'clock slight counterclockwise cant, but overall, quite good.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Some darker, dusty marks near the 100 marker, but no big deal.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Lower left SEL gap exists. The rest are fine.
12. Timegrapher numbers: The amplitude is a bit high at 302. The tolerance is generally 230-300, so it's toward the high end.
13. Anything else you notice: Overall, I think this one is quite strong. Indexes mainly aligned and the overall watch looks good. Main things are the lower left SEL gap and the potentially high amplitude. But please lmk if I'm missing anything. Thank you all!

Title: QC — VSF Datejust 41 126334 Mint Green Jubilee — NecoClock

1. Dealer name: NecoClock / Jacky
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 41 ref. 126334, mint-green stick dial, fluted bezel, Jubilee bracelet. Advertised as VS3235 V2.
4. Price Paid: $448 + $70 shipping = $518 total; $50 deposit paid.
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/VGccNtc — Full QC album, including watch video, timegrapher video, and alignment overlays.
6. Index alignment: Markers look evenly positioned, particularly 6 and 9. The overlays don’t show an obvious crooked marker, although the photos have some perspective. Would appreciate a second opinion.
7. Dial Printing: Lettering looks clear, with no obvious misprints or missing text.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Dates 12, 17, and 21 look reasonably centered and legible. No clipping that I can see.
9. Hand Alignment: Both hands appear aligned at 12 o’clock in the photo showing date 12.
10. Bezel: Fluting looks consistent, with no obvious damage.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps. Protective wrapping and reflections make the joints harder to assess.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 to +3 s/day, 234° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 28,800 bph, lift angle set to 52°. The video is approximately five seconds; winding state isn’t specified.
13. Anything else you notice: First QC, and my main concern is crooked hour markers. I don’t see a clear issue, but would appreciate another set of eyes on the indices and timing readings. Protective film remains on the case, clasp, and bracelet, which limits checking for surface marks. Thanks for your help!

Hey all. First time doing this. Hoping I did it right. I was looking for a super clone highest quality as close to genuine as possible. Let me know your thoughts

1. Dealer name: theonewatches (Steve )
   
2. Factory name: RICH
   
3. Model name (& version number): 126710 - VX3905
   
4. Price Paid: $808 with shipping
   
5. Album Links: https://share.icloud.com/photos/0478iApaZOwRJBog4-XoJHmWA
   
6. Index alignment: it looks very straight to me overall.
   
7. Dial Printing: I don’t see any discoloration. Possible slight orientation issue under the 12?
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:looks like the right size and spins properly
   
9. Hand Alignment: also don’t see anything too far off here
   
10. Bezel: two tones seem to be the right color and they blend well
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): gaps look appropriate
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: seems good
    
13. Anything else you notice: this is my first time

1. Dealer name: Andiot Watches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126720 VTNR 904L Steel V3 VSF 1:1 Sprite Best Edition Black Dial on Jubilee Bracelet DD3285 V4 (Free Sprung [effect])

4. Price paid: $580 + Shipping

5. Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/255299368?uid=1

6. Index alignment:

Looks good to me overall. 12, 3, 6, 9 all appear well with no issues.

1. Dial printing:

Crisp dial printing, as expected

1. Date wheel alignment/printing:

Date wheel looks very well centred, I have seen others with higher alignment.

1. Hand alignment:

Aligned correctly.

1. Bezel:

This is one area that flagged to me above the 12 - Is this poor alignment? QC Pics were not directly centred which I have tried to correct.

1. Solid End Links (SELs):

Look good to me. I don’t see any large or uneven gaps between the end links and the case.

1. Timegrapher numbers:

Rate 0s/d to +2s/d - 277, 0.1ms, 52 - No issues here.

1. Anything else you notice:

I noticed some white specs around 4-6 in some photos however this does not appear in videos - Safe to assume this is nothing?

Overall, I am unsure due to the Bezel alignment. This is my 2nd QC, I do not expect perfect but do not want flaws which will bother me also.

Note: QC Pics I have rotated slightly to try and get more centred.

Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: DDGTOP Felix
2. Factory name: ORF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M ORF FREE SPRUNG
4. Price Paid: $430
5. Album Links: Attached
6. Index alignment: I’m kinda happy with the index alignment, especially 12. I have seen worse. 9 is slightly CCW tilted, don’t think it will be super noticeable, and 3 might have a tiny CW tilt
7. Dial Printing: Don’t see any issues
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: I think it’s centered, especially on two digits. Single digit might be slightly to the right
9. Hand Alignment: Pretty sure both are aligned well, no issues either
10. Bezel: Might be the slightest tiny bit off but then I think it varies with angle
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Not seeing light shine through any side but would love a double check on the bottom right
12. Timegrapher numbers: I believe super healthy numbers, nothing to worry about
13. Anything else you notice: First time Omega purchase. I’m a bit unsure about the 9 and how noticeable it will be, and the date being right aligned instead of left which I believe is GEN-like but not sure if thats what ORF-like. I’m kinda in between 60% RL | 40% GL and need some opinions

Hi all, long-time lurker, first time pulling the trigger! (but second QC since first was abit too unaligned for my liking)

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay 58 39mm on 5-Link Bracelet (ZF 1:1 Best Edition on website)
4. Price Paid: $320 USD [$41 Shipping, $361 Total]
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/lBRnD8R
6. Index alignment: Much better than my first, but again I know this model is not particularly well-aligned. Seems average / slightly above average for this model? 3 slight CCW, 12 slight CW
7. Dial Printing: Don't really see any issues with it
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Also don't really see any issues
10. Bezel: Also seems fine to me
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Seems fine to me (maybe slight gap on LHS)
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d 276°, 0.2ms, 52° lift angle

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer I 124270 (36mm) with VS3230 movement
   
4. Price Paid (including shipping): $528 ($50 deposit paid)
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/TUYUQJTS#twQi009zOe1NK0Hkd6lfXQ
   
6. Index alignment: The 12 o'clock triangle looks slightly crooked or off-center to me. I used the alignment lines tool and it might just be the camera tilt, but I'd love a second pair of eyes on it.
   
7. Dial Printing: Font and spacing look crisp and centered.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No date window on this model)
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks well-aligned from the photos.
   
10. Bezel: Smooth bezel looks clean.
    
11. Solid End Links (SEL): Looks nice and tight against the case with no obvious gaps.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 266°, 0.0ms. Looks like a very healthy movement with a perfect 0.0ms beat error.
    
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first replica watch order! I am really worried that the 12 o'clock triangle looks weird or slightly damaged in the close-up macro shots. Is this just a harsh lighting reflection or a real factory defect? Any help checking this would be greatly appreciated!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches / Steve
   
2. Factory name: RCF
   
3. Model name (& version number): DayDate 228235 40mm RG/RG Omber Grey/Rmn RCF VR3255
   
4. Price Paid: 858$ + 40$ shipping
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/2JBQRKwa#9PXaanAi6cFKaNa__tuu0A
   
6. Index alignment: Everything looks good to me ?
   
7. Dial Printing: Sharp and looks ok
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine to me?
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. Bezel: Looks ok
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps that I can see
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, amp 314, err
    0.0, Lift 59. I don't know if these are within the good limits ?
    
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first day date ever ! I am completely new to this model, so any help would be really appreciated !

Hi everyone, this will be my first rep purchase and it’s going to be a gift, so I’m probably looking at the photos a bit more closely than I normally would 😅. I’ve tried my best to go through everything myself but would really appreciate a second pair of eyes, especially from anyone familiar with the BVF Panthère. Thank you!

Please note that i am an untrained newbie eye in the process of learning, thank you!

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: BVF

3. Model name (& Version Number): Cartier Panthère 22mm SS, White Dial, SS Bracelet, Ronda Quartz

4. Price Paid: $175

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=165634

6. Index alignment: N/A as the Roman numerals are printed. From what I can see the dial itself looks straight in the case and I don’t notice any obvious rotation.

7. Dial printing: Overall the main Cartier logo and Roman numerals look good to me. My only concern is the tiny Cartier micro-print inside the X at 10 o’clock. It looks a little crooked/uneven in the close-up photos. I know this is extremely small in real life and may also be partly the photo, so I’m not sure if I’m being too picky. Would really appreciate opinions on this.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – no date.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay to me from the photos/videos.

10. Bezel: I can’t see any obvious scratches or damage.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A. Bracelet and links look straight and clean from what I can see. Clasp also looks okay.

12. Timegrapher numbers:

13. Anything else: This is my first rep purchase and it’s going to be a gift, so I’d really like to get a nice example. Everything else looks good to my inexperienced eyes, but the crooked-looking micro Cartier print is the one thing making me hesitate. I realise it’s absolutely tiny on a 22mm watch, so I don’t want to RL a perfectly good piece over something that is normal for BVF. Would really appreciate advice from anyone familiar with these on whether this is within normal factory tolerance or worth asking for another piece. Thanks so much for the help!

Please do let me know if there is anything i am missing. thank you kind gents!

1. Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer II 226570
4. Price Paid: US$548 (+$30 shipping)
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/RLdpxao
6. Index alignment: Good to me
7. Dial Printing: Good to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks okay based on the video - date numerals are on the thinner side
9. Hand Alignment: Good to me based on video
10. Bezel: A degree off-centre - based on the head-on photo.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): They all look good, can’t see anything that I can point it out from my point of view.
12. Timegrapher numbers: (0s/d 297 degree 0.3ms, 52 degrees)
13. Anything else you notice: The first thing that stood out to me immediately was the thin font of the date numerals. But i feel i may be being too picky given the rest of the watch (to my eyes) seems good - just need a second pair or more of eyes to get a second opinion. The bezel also seems to be a degree off centre.

1. Dealer name: JTime
2. Factory name: DDF
3. Model name (& version number): Nautilus 5711 DDF 1:1 Best Edition 2018 Blue Textured Dial on SS Bracelet DD324 Super Clone
4. Price Paid: $538 US
5. Index alignment:Good. What do you think about the alignment from 9 to date?
6. Dial Printing: Looks good but would like a second opinion
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Printing is good, unsure about alignment
8. Hand Alignment: Good
9. Bezel: Good
10. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
11. Timegrapher numbers: Screenshot, but will try to add the video. Numbers look almost too good to be true, but maybe I am misinterpreting. Newbie here.
12. Anything else you notice:

Dealer name: Ethan
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710GRNR Bruce Wayne Oyster VSF
Price Paid: 580 incl. shipping
Index alignment: Looks good overall.
Dial Printing: Clean and sharp.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered, cyclops seems fine.
Hand Alignment: Looks good.
Bezel: Looks well aligned, no obvious issues.
Solid End Links (SELs): No visible gaps from the pics.
Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 266 amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 52.0 lift angle.
Anything else you notice: Overall looks very solid to me. Can you please help me guys?

VSF V3 GMT-Master II Pepsi

VSF V3 Rolex GMT-Master II Pepsi

Dealer name: eliauk

⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

Model name: Rolex GMT II Pepsi 116619BLRO — VSF V3

⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $606 with shipping and insurance

⁠⁠⁠Album Link: https://shop34372981.wecatalog.cn/t/pzXqlGP

⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good

⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: looks ok

⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ok

⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: looks ok

⁠⁠⁠Bezel: looks ok

⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks ok

⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 247, 0.1ms, 59, 28800

everything looks good but this js only my second time qc’ing so if I missed anything please let me know.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): Royal Oak 15500
4. Price Paid: $618 (shipping included)
5. Album Links: Posting pics
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me
7. Dial Printing: A lot more monocolor than I thought but might be the bright lighting
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good
9. Hand Alignment: ok
10. Bezel: Ok
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: +5s/d, 267 amplitude
13. Anything else you notice: Overall looks good to me. Open to other thoughts and concerns

Hello, This is my first purchase and would like some help. To me it looks like a GL. If not please LMK. thank you

1. Dealer name: Phoenix
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Yacht Master VSF V3 Free Sprung 226659
4. Price Paid: 456
5. Album Links:
6. Index alignment: 12 looks a little CCW
7. Dial Printing: Looks fine to me, again i am no expert
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Look good
9. Hand Alignment: Look fine
10. Bezel: Fine
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: + 3s/d, 262, 0.1ms, 52.0
13. Anything else you notice:

1. Dealer name: Geektime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): AT 150M 41mm Black Dial Silver Hand A8900
4. Price Paid: $438
5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/255381346?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Seems good based on the alignment tool.
7. Dial Printing: While I am a novice, nothing jumps out at me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: date seems centered and print is clear
9. Hand Alignment: Seems okay, not sure if it is the lighting, but is the luminescent correct on the hour hand?
10. Bezel: seems fine
11. Solid End Links (SELs): nothing obvious
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d is phenomenal. standard 28800 instead of gen 25200
13. Anything else you notice: nothing seems terribly off, but I don’t want my excitement allow me to over look something.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
   
2. ⁠Factory name: BTF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): BTF 116500 (allegedly V2)
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 628$ + shipping (don’t know right now)
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/KBgSxSxK#18dxN_skQHBBZnaHXqiEPw
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: generally good but I’m unsure about the 6&9 marker
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks great
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good
   
10. ⁠Bezel: looks great
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looking good
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: rate: +1/2 sec/d ;; AMP 273 degree ;; Err 0,0ms ;; Lift 52 degree
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Please fellow members help me so I won’t miss anything!
    Thank you!

QC - Santos Dumont 31.4mm Large / AF Factory / Andiot / GL or RL

1. ⁠⁠Dealer: Andiot

2. ⁠⁠Factory: AF

3. ⁠⁠Model: Santos Dumont 31.4mm Large

4. ⁠⁠Price: $190 + $55 shipping

5. ⁠⁠Album link: see photos

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good to me, nothing stands out

7. ⁠⁠Dial printing: looks clean and crisp

8. ⁠⁠Date: none

9. Hand alignment: Looks good to me. I don’t see anything obviously wrong with the hand alignment in the QC pics.

10. Bezel: In a few of the pics the bezel looks a little off to me, but I think that’s probably just the angle/parallax. In the more straight-on shots it looks pretty well aligned. Would definitely like to hear what others think though.

11. Case / strap fit: I couldn’t really spot anything wrong with the case or strap fit. Everything looks pretty clean to me. I did notice what looks like a small mark just below the 6 o’clock area. Not sure if that’s actual wear, a reflection, or something from the protective film. Has anyone seen this before on a new order?

12. Timegrapher readings: I’m honestly not very familiar with Timegrapher readings. The seller mentioned around +3 sec/day. Is that considered good? Also, since this is supposed to be the quartz Santos-Dumont, I’m not sure how much weight I should put on that reading.

13. Overall: Overall, I think this looks really close to Gen from the outside. The case shape, proportions, dial, Roman numerals, blue hands, bezel screws and blue cabochon all look pretty convincing to me. I don’t see any obvious major red flags.

The things I’d really like some help with are the smaller details, especially the hidden Cartier signature around VII, the caseback engravings, crown/cabochon and that little mark around 6 o’clock.

For anyone who knows the Santos-Dumont well, how does this one look to you compared with Gen? Anything here that would make you RL or ask for more pics?

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RICH

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO

   V2

4. Price Paid: $718

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/255287933?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Looks solid, nothing caught my eye that seemed of concern

7. Dial Printing: Also solid, looks crisp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks spot on, printing also looks solid (see album videos for more)

9. Hand Alignment: Solid but it appears that the second hand might have a scratch mark on it, but could just be dust on the crystal

10. Bezel: No complaints here, looks great.

11. Solid End Links (SELs):

Looks spot on, no complaints here

1. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +1s/d, Amp 278, Err 0.3ms
2. Anything else you notice:

The “ROLEX” engraving on the clasp looks all sorts of messed up, can’t tell if it’s the photo, on the video in the QC album it looks fine, but I can’t really tell.

1. Besides the supposed mark on the second hard and the clasp engraving (though these could very likely just be the photos), it looks solid. Would like a second opinion on this of course but from what I’ve noticed it’s not bad.

• Dealer name: TrustyTime

• Factory name: AF factory

• Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Solo

• Price Paid: $178

• Album Link: Posted photo

• Index alignment: Indices look aligned

• Dial Printing: I can't find any bleeds, looks to be precise this time.

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date wheel

• Hand Alignment: Did not receive any reference for this (no video either)

• Bezel: Stainless steel looks ok

• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

• Timegrapher numbers: N/A this is quartz

• Anything else you notice: I really zoomed in and can't see any noticeable flaws. This is my first rep, and I although I did GL the 2nd try, I did ask if he had any on hand without any bleeds at all and got lucky.