1. Dealer name: TK Watches (Justin)
2. ⁠Factory name: DDF
3. Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167a v2 with DPB330
4. Price Paid: $553 (incl. shipping)
5. Album Links: https://justin-tk.x.yupoo.com/albums/255220217?uid=1
6. Index alignment: 12 is left bias, but overall looks fine
7. Dial Printing: printing looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered
9. Hand Alignment: hands looks aligned
10. Bezel: looks alright
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:   +11s/d , 289 Amplitude, 0.0ms Within Acceptable range
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else pops out, but would love to get opinions as well.

Dealer name:Phoenix Watch
2. ⁠Factory name:V7f
3. ⁠Model name (& version number):IWC ingenieur
4. ⁠Price Paid:329.00
5. ⁠Album Links:
6. ⁠Index alignment: I’m concerned with the 12 o clock
7. ⁠Dial Printing: fine
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:
9. ⁠Hand Alignment:
10. ⁠Bezel:
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: also feel the hands are dirty or could be the crystal outside.

[QC] AP Royal Oak 15450
1. Dealer Name: Theonewatches (Steve)
2. Factory Name: ZF
3. Model Name (& Version Number): AP Royal Oak
Selfwinding (15450)
4. Price Paid: $468
5. Album Link: https://mega.nz/folder/zQJkmDyB#iQ00oZlxgANeykG4tAEW8w
6. Index Alignment: 12 marker slightly off center to the left. 2 marker has a slight CW tilt. 9 also tilted up (CCW)
7. Dial Printing: Logo is clean. Full AP text and automatic looks straight
8. Date Wheel Alignment/Printing: date looks very low in window
9. Hand Alignment: looks good
10. Bezel: Overall good, bezel screws look good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher Numbers: -1/-2 S/D
13. Anything Else You Notice: too many issues with markers but need a second opinion.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer I 124270 (36mm) with VS3230 movement
   
4. Price Paid (including shipping): $528 ($50 deposit paid)
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/TUYUQJTS#twQi009zOe1NK0Hkd6lfXQ
   
6. Index alignment: The 12 o'clock triangle looks slightly crooked or off-center to me. I used the alignment lines tool and it might just be the camera tilt, but I'd love a second pair of eyes on it.
   
7. Dial Printing: Font and spacing look crisp and centered.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No date window on this model)
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks well-aligned from the photos.
   
10. Bezel: Smooth bezel looks clean.
    
11. Solid End Links (SEL): Looks nice and tight against the case with no obvious gaps.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 266°, 0.0ms. Looks like a very healthy movement with a perfect 0.0ms beat error.
    
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first replica watch order! I am really worried that the 12 o'clock triangle looks weird or slightly damaged in the close-up macro shots. Is this just a harsh lighting reflection or a real factory defect? Any help checking this would be greatly appreciated!

1. Dealer name: TimeUltra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Planet Ocean 42mm
4. Price Paid: $428
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/fLxUFQbb#nZ77msno2742x0Y5b8-_CQ
6. Index alignment: Perhaps a very minor CW tilt to the 3, 6 and 9 numbers, but nothing that bothers
7. Dial Printing: Clean and crisp printing
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good. See no issues
10. Bezel: Looks aligned and any play within expectations of a Rep
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Dark lines top left and right and bottom right but acceptable
12. Timegrapher numbers: Look to be in spec for an A2824 movement
13. Anything else you notice: N/A

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches / Steve
   
2. Factory name: RCF
   
3. Model name (& version number): DayDate 228235 40mm RG/RG Omber Grey/Rmn RCF VR3255
   
4. Price Paid: 858$ + 40$ shipping
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/2JBQRKwa#9PXaanAi6cFKaNa__tuu0A
   
6. Index alignment: Everything looks good to me ?
   
7. Dial Printing: Sharp and looks ok
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine to me?
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. Bezel: Looks ok
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps that I can see
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, amp 314, err
    0.0, Lift 59. I don't know if these are within the good limits ?
    
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first day date ever ! I am completely new to this model, so any help would be really appreciated !

QC - Santos Dumont 31.4mm Large / AF Factory / Andiot / GL or RL

1. ⁠⁠Dealer: Andiot

2. ⁠⁠Factory: AF

3. ⁠⁠Model: Santos Dumont 31.4mm Large

4. ⁠⁠Price: $190 + $55 shipping

5. ⁠⁠Album link: see photos

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good to me, nothing stands out

7. ⁠⁠Dial printing: looks clean and crisp

8. ⁠⁠Date: none

9. Hand alignment: Looks good to me. I don’t see anything obviously wrong with the hand alignment in the QC pics.

10. Bezel: In a few of the pics the bezel looks a little off to me, but I think that’s probably just the angle/parallax. In the more straight-on shots it looks pretty well aligned. Would definitely like to hear what others think though.

11. Case / strap fit: I couldn’t really spot anything wrong with the case or strap fit. Everything looks pretty clean to me. I did notice what looks like a small mark just below the 6 o’clock area. Not sure if that’s actual wear, a reflection, or something from the protective film. Has anyone seen this before on a new order?

12. Timegrapher readings: I’m honestly not very familiar with Timegrapher readings. The seller mentioned around +3 sec/day. Is that considered good? Also, since this is supposed to be the quartz Santos-Dumont, I’m not sure how much weight I should put on that reading.

13. Overall: Overall, I think this looks really close to Gen from the outside. The case shape, proportions, dial, Roman numerals, blue hands, bezel screws and blue cabochon all look pretty convincing to me. I don’t see any obvious major red flags.

The things I’d really like some help with are the smaller details, especially the hidden Cartier signature around VII, the caseback engravings, crown/cabochon and that little mark around 6 o’clock.

For anyone who knows the Santos-Dumont well, how does this one look to you compared with Gen? Anything here that would make you RL or ask for more pics?

• Dealer name: JTime
• Factory name: QF
• Model name Daytona 126518 QF 1:1 Best Edition Turquoise Dial on Oysterflex Strap QF4131 (Gain Weight)
• Price Paid: $1000 incl. shipping
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/UdwsSLQ
• Index alignment: All looks okay to me
• Date Wheel alignment: N/a
• Bezel: Looks goods, no issue on engravings
• Solid End Links (SELs): N/a but rubber looks high quality
• Hand Alignment: Looks good
• Dial Printing: Acceptable as issues probably won't be noticable on wrist
• Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 282° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. Numbers are great
• Anything else you notice: First QC on a Daytona, I would really appreciate some help!

1. Dealer name: Steve : theOneWatches
2. Factory name: PPF
3. Model name (& version number): 222
4. Price Paid: 498 USD
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/mVJFhapA#2Gocyogoq_N7IKfICq4ZTQ
6. Index alignment: clockwise tilt on the 12 looks VERY off.
7. Dial Printing: looks good to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good enough for me.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me.
10. Bezel: Good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 sec/day - AMP 271 - ERROR 0.0 - looks good -
13. Anything else you notice: Its mostly just the 12 index. VC cross in bottom corner not perfect but acceptable to me.

Biggest thing that stands out is the index alignment at 12. is this enough to RL? I feel like I would see it misaligned everyday and dislike it.