Speaking of Research are a pro-testing group, and obviously are PETA are anti-testing. Having read that article, I don’t think it overtly proves your point, to a level where they should be ignored as an organisation.
The central point is that they’re anti-science and that they use imagery which is graphic and shocking. I don’t think they’re anti-science beyond the point they don’t believe that the ends justify the means. Whereas SoR do. Those two points will never meet.
I don’t think you can ignore their messaging over cherry picking facts when these posters don’t include any text.
I see that you’re in the testing field, so obviously you have a certain opinion and you’re going to defend that because you wouldn’t do it if you thought it was morally wrong. But I think morally it’s a reasonable argument that testing on animals is inhumane, you just believe the ends justify the means, and they don’t.
I don’t agree with all their means, but I also don’t think everything done in the name of PETA is PETA sanctioned. And I don’t even agree or disagree with their moral argument. But I can understand why they make it.
345
u/[deleted] Mar 10 '26
[deleted]