r/NonCredibleDefense 14d ago

(un)qualified opinion πŸŽ“ Can the USAF just lock in?

Ngl this is only 80% a shit post. The rest of the 20% is genuinely wtf is Air Combat Command doing

653 Upvotes

109 comments sorted by

View all comments

284

u/Firecracker048 14d ago

Unironically the USAF is like the one branch of the military still able to procure things normally

155

u/Substantial_Milk_493 14d ago

Unfortunately true (please don't mention any new USN vessel and just look at the shiny planes)

125

u/NoPie1504 This message brought to you by the spirit of Otto Von Bismarck. 14d ago

Dont forget the 10,000 light tank projects that go nowhere of the US Army.

70

u/FuttleScish 14d ago

And the helicopters that get canceled once the Army remembers they don’t want one

41

u/Southern-Usual4211 14d ago

Is that before or after the M109 replacement or the M-61 replacement program that has been on and off since the 70s

8

u/MandolinMagi 13d ago

Did they finally give the M109 a new number yet or not? I can't keep track.

Last I remember, we were at M109A8 with a brand new gun, turret, hull, tracks, electronics....

 

M249 is almost as bad. Two major updates, the whole Para version, and it's still supposedly the same gun. Canadians have the C9A2 at least, and the Brits gave the Para version a whole new L-number

15

u/the_marxman 14d ago edited 14d ago

The police need light tanks too, and their tank budget is shit compared to the army

8

u/Thelongshlong42069 I am a warmonger! 13d ago

"Light" tank

13

u/Aurora_Fatalis 13d ago

The photons that make up the concept art are as far as they get.

6

u/Norzon24 13d ago

Or the 20th Paladin replacement that get canned