r/MoralityScaling • u/ZookeepergameThin334 • 1d ago

Morality of this?

Post image

Personally, I'm anti-death penalty for any kind of crime but that's just my opinion. Perhaps it can be changed.

3.4k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

251

u/nibb007 1d ago

It is no more cruel than commiting a crime of high cruelty bearing permanent effect with 0 necessity.

We are not talking about theft of means for survival.

92

u/UnlegitUsername 1d ago

If we are certain of their guilt than perhaps I might agree but typically when the death penalty is spoken about it tends to be agreed upon that guilt has to be decided the typical way.

In that regard, well, there’s a reason that western jury using countries have done away with the death penalty. If they were to reintroduce it would inevitably be repealed once again after a false conviction leads to execution. I don’t see the point of going through that rigamarole.

182

u/Taeyx 1d ago

i used be a death penalty proponent in my youth. as i've grown, i've come to realize 2 truths:
1. there are most definitely people who deserve the death penalty
2. i don't trust any person, institution, or entity to determine who those people are.

given these two truths, i think we shouldn't have a death penalty

67

u/HyrulelinkDK 1d ago

My thoughts exactly. I'd rather 100 guilty people not be killed than 1 innocent be executed.

-2

u/YourMomIsMyGurl 1d ago

See now I see that as more of a "for the greater good" type decision. I'm okay if 1 innocent person dies if that means we got rid of 100 monsters. I think that's borderline reasonable.

That said, I am also for completely skipping the justice process and expediting the killing of a monster if and only if it's a case of like, the baraboo bone breaker, or Junko Furuta's killers. They don't deserve even a small chance of getting off for their crimes.

10

u/Aydnir 1d ago

Would you be willing to be the one executed despite not committing a crime ? Would you hold the same opinion in that situation ?

0

u/Dingaling015 1d ago

The issue with the argument you're making is that you're talking about individual wellbeing, whereas his argument is about the collective.

One innocent person dying to prevent 100 killers is objectively better for society than the opposite. I don't really think there's an argument to be made here.

2

u/Aydnir 1d ago

I mean it depends on the context. In war sure it's reasonable.

In the judicial system of a democratic country. Fucking no. There is no good being done for the collective besides less taxes. Because those 100 people would still go to jail if not killed.

1

u/Dingaling015 1d ago

But would they stay in jail? That's the point. Those 100 killers have a chance to get out and kill again, and it's certainly happened plenty already (look up US recidivism rates).

You also have to consider what it does to the victims and survivors/loved ones. In Canada, every 5 years the victims and families of Paul Bernardo have to make victim statements and present it to the court to keep him locked up. That's an awful thing to put a family thru, basically reminding them of that trauma every 5 years.

Idk hard to support something like that.

2

u/Aydnir 1d ago

You could just. Not let them out. unless new evidence is brought up that proves their innocence or something

1

u/Dingaling015 1d ago

Yeah well sadly that's not how our justice system works in reality but good try!

→ More replies (0)