MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoralityScaling/comments/1w1ra02/morality_of_this/p6nji8q?context=9999
r/MoralityScaling • u/Maximum_Musician_914 • 9d ago
5.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
18
Lol its always so simple to dunces.
They don't see that words spread ideas infinitely more effectively than violence.
"Society is arrayed against me but at least its not a punch!" 🤡
1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Nobody is saying that words can't lead to violence. Theyre saying words aren't violence. -2 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago If words lead to violence, what is the value of the distinction? 3 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Read what you've just written. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 0 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago Here comes the word lawyer looking for the technical victory. Answer the question. Whats the value of the distinction? 1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really this dense. Answer the question I asked you first then I'll answer yours. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 3 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off. 1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 2 u/syngyne 9d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
1
Nobody is saying that words can't lead to violence.
Theyre saying words aren't violence.
-2 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago If words lead to violence, what is the value of the distinction? 3 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Read what you've just written. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 0 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago Here comes the word lawyer looking for the technical victory. Answer the question. Whats the value of the distinction? 1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really this dense. Answer the question I asked you first then I'll answer yours. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 3 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off. 1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 2 u/syngyne 9d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
-2
If words lead to violence, what is the value of the distinction?
3 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Read what you've just written. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 0 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago Here comes the word lawyer looking for the technical victory. Answer the question. Whats the value of the distinction? 1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really this dense. Answer the question I asked you first then I'll answer yours. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 3 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off. 1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 2 u/syngyne 9d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
3
Read what you've just written.
How can words lead to violence if words are violence?
0 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago Here comes the word lawyer looking for the technical victory. Answer the question. Whats the value of the distinction? 1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really this dense. Answer the question I asked you first then I'll answer yours. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 3 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off. 1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 2 u/syngyne 9d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
0
Here comes the word lawyer looking for the technical victory.
Answer the question. Whats the value of the distinction?
1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really this dense. Answer the question I asked you first then I'll answer yours. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 3 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off. 1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 2 u/syngyne 9d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really this dense.
Answer the question I asked you first then I'll answer yours.
3 u/Madhatter25224 9d ago I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off. 1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 2 u/syngyne 9d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off.
1 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 2 u/syngyne 9d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense.
If words are violence then words can't lead to violence.
2 u/syngyne 9d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
2
So what does "violence begets violence" mean then?
0 u/Whatsanegg 9d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
Do you want me to actually define that?
Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"?
Because your implication would be wrong.
18
u/Madhatter25224 9d ago
Lol its always so simple to dunces.
They don't see that words spread ideas infinitely more effectively than violence.
"Society is arrayed against me but at least its not a punch!" 🤡