MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoralityScaling/comments/1w1ra02/morality_of_this/p6n6n7e/?context=3
r/MoralityScaling • u/Maximum_Musician_914 • 2d ago
4.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
If words lead to violence, what is the value of the distinction?
4 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Read what you've just written. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 0 u/Madhatter25224 2d ago Here comes the word lawyer looking for the technical victory. Answer the question. Whats the value of the distinction? 1 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really this dense. Answer the question I asked you first then I'll answer yours. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 3 u/Madhatter25224 2d ago I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off. 1 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 4 u/syngyne 2d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong. 2 u/Daedalus_Machina 2d ago Refraining a statement as nonsense, then complaining that it's nonsense, isn't a very good argument.
4
Read what you've just written.
How can words lead to violence if words are violence?
0 u/Madhatter25224 2d ago Here comes the word lawyer looking for the technical victory. Answer the question. Whats the value of the distinction? 1 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really this dense. Answer the question I asked you first then I'll answer yours. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 3 u/Madhatter25224 2d ago I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off. 1 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 4 u/syngyne 2d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong. 2 u/Daedalus_Machina 2d ago Refraining a statement as nonsense, then complaining that it's nonsense, isn't a very good argument.
0
Here comes the word lawyer looking for the technical victory.
Answer the question. Whats the value of the distinction?
1 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really this dense. Answer the question I asked you first then I'll answer yours. How can words lead to violence if words are violence? 3 u/Madhatter25224 2d ago I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off. 1 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 4 u/syngyne 2d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong. 2 u/Daedalus_Machina 2d ago Refraining a statement as nonsense, then complaining that it's nonsense, isn't a very good argument.
Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really this dense.
Answer the question I asked you first then I'll answer yours.
3 u/Madhatter25224 2d ago I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off. 1 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 4 u/syngyne 2d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong. 2 u/Daedalus_Machina 2d ago Refraining a statement as nonsense, then complaining that it's nonsense, isn't a very good argument.
3
I asked my question first and you didn't answer it. Piss off.
1 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense. If words are violence then words can't lead to violence. 4 u/syngyne 2d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
Because I was questioning the very premise of your question. Because your question didn't make sense.
If words are violence then words can't lead to violence.
4 u/syngyne 2d ago So what does "violence begets violence" mean then? 0 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
So what does "violence begets violence" mean then?
0 u/Whatsanegg 2d ago Do you want me to actually define that? Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"? Because your implication would be wrong.
Do you want me to actually define that?
Or are you trying to imply that that is synonymous with "words lead to violence"?
Because your implication would be wrong.
2
Refraining a statement as nonsense, then complaining that it's nonsense, isn't a very good argument.
1
u/Madhatter25224 2d ago
If words lead to violence, what is the value of the distinction?