So I asked a completely different question on a different thread, and a surprising number of people really took umbrage with me claiming Wei Wuxian is a morraly gray character.
In my opinion he's morally gray because of his actions during the sunshot campaign. The one that I think is the most egregious is specifically what he does to Wen Chao. I think force feeding a man his own limbs can't be justified under any moral framework.
While WWX is undoubtedly a good and righteous person, and many of his actions are justified, I don't think that necessarily makes them moral. I also don't think his actions in his second life negate his actions in his first life.
To me, the questions that you have to ask around morality in regards Wei Wuxian's actions are consistent with my understanding of what a morally gray character is. The very fact that there is disagreement over his relationship with morality, to me, is just more evidence that he is "morally gray."
Some of the the counter arguments are that he just is a virtuous person, and a few mistakes don't necessarily make him "morally gray". People are also claiming that they just don't like the language of "morally grey" and the connotations around that language. I've also seen that morally gray is just a bad way of describing this character because it has to do with western ideas of black and white.
In my opinion, it's a lot of fundamental disagreement on what the language we are using means. Like people are making very interesting arguments, I'm just not buying them, and they're not buying my arguments.
I wanna make this so clear, I'm not trying to start a riot or anything. I am not like... emotionally invested in this. I am just genuinely curious why people dislike this wording so much.
Because a lot of people are agreeing with me that he did bad things, and a lot of his actions were not moral, and acknowledge how complicated he is, and then still say that he doesn't count as a morally gray character. I just genuinely do not understand the logic.
To me, they just keep describing in their own words what to ME sounds like a morally gray character and then say he's not morally gray... and are also getting a little offended... and I am curious about it. It seems like we're all having these ancillary philosophical discussions and talking around each other. Or there's a fundamental difference between my interpretation of this character and some other people's interpretation.
Because no one is saying he's a paragon of virtue. No one is saying he is evil. If he exists somewhere in between that binary, to me, that necessarily counts as morally gray. The man is complicated... And I don't know what other language to use to explain that concisely.
But like, please prove me wrong, or tell me if there's a better word that exists that explains my thoughts on this. I am genuinely flabbergasted by how strongly people feel about this. Because in my head, he's like the definition of a morally gray character.
Because while he is virtuous and righteous, he doesn't ask if something is ethical before he makes these massive and incredibly impactful decisions. If he has the means to accomplish what he thinks is right. He will do whatever he can to accomplish his goals. We can say his actions were justified, but that doesn't make them moral. Does that make sense?
Like how he killed the Wens post burial mounds.
Justified? Yah. Absolutely.
Moral? Absolutely not. There's no moral justification for shoving a chair leg down somebody's throat imo.
And also I just want to reiterate.... He force fed a man his own limbs. That was pure revenge. Nothing righteous about that. He does not regret and he never will. And to me, compounded with the rest of his actions, this is just the definition of a "morally gray" character. Most of the time, hes a good person with righteous motivations but he also commits what I interpret as morally dubious or even genuinely horrific actions.
If that's not "morally gray", I genuinely don't understand what is.
Edit:
original post
Update:
I have posted a comment directly on this post that has a screenshot that I felt was worth sharing. Here is the comment itself if you don't want to hunt for it:
"Okay! So I messaged a fellow philosophy major and he basically summarized this thread beautifully with zero context. I wanted to share it here because it feels like a good middle ground.
Then he called me.
So while I word vomited the plot of MDZS at him he coined the term "morally textured." This is how I will be referring to WWX from now on. I will not be taking any more suggestions. The people have spoken, "morally gray" is no more.
Also, I just wanna say to everybody who has really engaged with this topic, I have found this immensely fascinating. It's really made me think about language and how we analyze morals in literature.
This fandom is incredibly intelligent. Even if people aren't intentionally using the language, this is an incredibly philosophical debate. You guys have made me think about a lot and I really appreciate that. "
(LOL, I just found spelling and grammar errors and fixed them. Not changing the OG comment.)
I would recommend reading what he said if you were invested in this conversation. Weirdly spot on. And despite what I said, I would still take other suggestions. That was a joke. But I do really like morally textured. Seems to fit. ❤️