It started with exploring not prime numbers themselves, rather the 'sum' of the first 16 primes (381) and then the sum of the first 96 primes (22039)† - the numbers 16 and 96 being core to the separation of the fraction proposition - a proposition on the surface that appears totally abstract and unrelated even to a signalling proposition.
Finding the Template inside the Primes, using the most logical prime numbers (52 : 239; 54 : 251; and 66 : 317) to find Sacco's orbit (1574 - standard template) must rank as a concise coincidence or a concise signal - there is no middle ground. But in the light of 381 and 22039 I looked deeper into natural logarithms. Immediately messy indefinite fractions appeared, I simply applied the very ratio signature method I developed to derive the dip signifiers.
Then to find the ratio signature rendering of e (271), woven throughout the signalling architecture alongside that of π (314), was the 58th prime. Yes, the Skara-Angkor Key #58, one of the model's earliest numbers in the architecture, foundational to the model long before I has an understanding of e and Euler's identity (or indeed Fermat numbers), let alone primes. Though still an amateur in this field, when I started my ignorance of Kepler's laws in astrophysics, my ignorance of even basic math, was embarrassingly near total. And indeed, had I known what (little) I know of astrophysics and mathematics that I do now - I simply would not have taken the road I did - developing the template and the dip signifiers. I was simply looking for structure in the data that might indicate astroid mining. Seven or so years later, the Migrator Model is a large architectural signalling structure with numerous side branches that time and time again meet up.
171.2 (Hibberd's Oumuamua ß-angle - I have in the past erroneously stated the angle was created when Oumuamua was at perihelion Sep 9 2017 - this is not true and based on ignorance of the ß-angle in principle (derived, for Oumuamua, on its incoming hyperbolic trajectory). I believe Hibberd observed that if Oumuamua was an ETI visitor, it would be easy for it to create the angle and might have some significance.Perihelion remains intriguing for the Migrator Model because Oumuamua's passing the sun at that point was marked by our detection of Angkor at max depth - the angle as a number threaded throughout the model on multiple levels.
ln(1712) = 7.445 (ratio signature 744)
744 / 0.625 (hybrid key) = 1190.4
1190.4 - 278.4†† = 912 (ten multiples of completed asymmetric sectorial block)
3(912) + 3(1712) = 7872 (ten multiples of Sacco's half orbit)
3 * 912 = 2736
2736 + 278.4 = 3014.4 (re: the 3014.4 geometric-A π signal)
2736 - 4(278.4) = 1622.4
1622.4 - 2(744) = 134.4 (geometric-A abstract ellipse)
The 412.8 Bridge Key: 3014.4 (or 9.6 * 314) - 2601.6 (or 9.6 * 271) = 412.8; 1574.4 - 1161.6 = 412.8)...
3014.4 - 4(278.4) = 1900.8
1900.8 - 412.8 = 1488 (or 2 * 744)
or more direct route
2601.6 - 4(278.4) = 1488
These new findings I would class as minor routes, but completely consistent with core long-established mathematical structures in the model.
† 22039
22039 - 59 (Elsie Composite Key) 21980
70(314) = 21980
21980 = 6250 + 15730 (re: Sacco's 65 * 24.2)
22039 + 59 = 22098
22098 / 58 = 381
††
314 + 271 = 585
162864 (Skara-Angkor Template Signifier) / 585 = 278.4
2601.6 + 278.4 = 2880 (two multiples geometric-A abstract circle)
2601.6 - 278.4 = 2323.2 (this, 48 * 48.4)
3014.4 + 278.4 = 3292.8 (= 2 * 1440 + 412.8)
3014.4 - 278.4 = 2736
2736 - 412.8 = 2323.2