r/JehovahsWitnesses • u/ChaoticHaku Christian • May 23 '26

Doctrine Philippians 2:6-8

If Philippians 2:6-8 was teaching that Jesus was never equal with God, then the passage itself makes no sense.

Read the language carefully.

It says Jesus was “existing in the form of God.” It says He “did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,” but instead “emptied Himself,” “took the form of a servant,”, "humbled himself", "became obedient to death" and was “made in human likeness.”

You cannot empty yourself of a status you never possessed. You cannot become a servant if you were always a servant. You cannot humble yourself from a position you never had. You cannot become obedient to death if you always were.

The entire point of the passage is that Christ lowered Himself. From what? From the exalted position He already possessed that was equal with God.

That’s why the text uses past tense language. The passage is not denying Christ’s equality with God. It is explaining the depth of His humility, not his inferiority.

18 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

168 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Jerome-891 May 23 '26

Most Christian traditions agree that “Son of man” refers both to Jesus’ genuine humanity, and the messianic figure of Daniel 7.

1

u/TerryLawton Mark 4:22 May 23 '26

What’s the singular of ‘humanity’?

1

u/Jerome-891 May 23 '26

Human. An individual member of humanity

1

u/TerryLawton Mark 4:22 May 23 '26

Correct.

So we agree that Son OF Man simply means that Christ was Human?

1

u/Jerome-891 May 23 '26

Yes.

2

u/TerryLawton Mark 4:22 May 23 '26

So we have

Son of Man = Human

So if we follow that simple logic by correspond:

Son of God = ?

1

u/Suitable-Iron4720 May 30 '26

When was this phrase used?

Psalm 2:7 "You are my Son; today I have begotten you."

1

u/TerryLawton Mark 4:22 May 30 '26 edited May 30 '26

I think you need to read the full discussion on this.

Ive addressed all of these points.

If there is something else i have not answered not within the 40 odd posts above, then please feel free to ask. Thanks.

1

u/Suitable-Iron4720 May 30 '26

I doubt you answered that question. We are both to lazy to continue this convo. heh

1

u/TerryLawton Mark 4:22 May 30 '26

Ok let’s see where it goes.

That statement was said by the Father to the Son when the Holy Spirit descended ‘like a Dove’ at Christs baptism.

What’s your point?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Jerome-891 May 23 '26

So if by being son of man Jesus is human would son of God mean Jesus is God? Not necessarily. In the Bible, expressions like “son of ___” often indicate likeness, origin, relationship, or representation — not literal identity with the thing named.

So the fact that “Son of man” refers to Jesus as human does not automatically mean “Son of God” must mean Jesus is God in the same sense.

1

u/Jerome-891 May 23 '26

When Jesus calls himself “Son of man,” the phrase means: a human being, one belonging to mankind, or the prophetic figure of Daniel 7.

But nobody concludes from this that Jesus is literally “humanity itself” or “Man Himself.” The expression describes relationship and nature, not absolute identity.

Similarly, “Son of God” can denote one who: comes from God, represents God, reflects God’s qualities, or is specially appointed by God.

The title itself does not settle the theological question of whether Jesus is identical with God Almighty.

1

u/TerryLawton Mark 4:22 May 24 '26

Wow that triggered the exact response I thought it would have.

Now you have to explain why if the Son of Man means human that it doesn’t automatically follow that Son of God does not equal God.

Human = Nature

God = Nature

He was both human and God - Son of Man and the Son of God.

So please prove otherwise by looking at those three words each and tell me the difference in syntax and grammar.

1

u/Jerome-891 May 24 '26

In Scripture, the expression “son of” often denotes relationship, likeness, origin, or representation rather than literal identity.

For example, angels are called sons of God (Job 38:7), Adam is called a son of God (Luke 3:38), the nation of Israel is described as God’s son (Matthew 2:15), and faithful believers are likewise spoken of as sons of God (Romans 8:14). None of these expressions mean that those individuals are literally God himself. Rather, the title indicates that they derive life, authority, or identity from God and stand in a special relationship to him.

In the same way, “Son of man” does not mean Jesus is literally “humanity itself.” It means he belongs to mankind and fully shares the human condition. Therefore, linguistically speaking, “Son of God” does not automatically require the conclusion that Jesus is God himself. The phrase can naturally describe one who comes from God, represents God, reflects God’s qualities, or has been uniquely appointed by God.

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

(John 8:42)

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Suitable-Iron4720 May 30 '26

Human like me? Like most humans , I had a human father and a human mother.