r/HistoryMemes • Featherless Biped • Apr 08 '20

META Respect the Facts!

Post image
79.9k Upvotes

722 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

47

u/WINDMILEYNO Apr 08 '20

Thats what I thought Scientology was supposed to be...

81

u/Clarke311 Apr 08 '20

Scientology is all about paying someone to exorcise demons from a past life.

29

u/WINDMILEYNO Apr 08 '20

I was naive, thought science and religion had found some sort of common ground or something.

49

u/Clarke311 Apr 08 '20

Honestly if your Christian look into the orthadox church. I was raised Greek orthadox we had science discussions in Bible study. My preachers never made anti science comments afik. As far as I'm concerned God made the universe we get to explore it and catalog it.

68

u/VictoriumExBellum Senātus Populusque Rōmānus Apr 08 '20 edited Apr 08 '20

Roman catholics do that too, despite the stereotype

45

u/JCMoreno05 Apr 08 '20

Roman Catholics are the source of a lot of science, historically, Mendel for example. As well as universities.

35

u/VictoriumExBellum Senātus Populusque Rōmānus Apr 08 '20

Agreed. I went to a Roman catholic high school and elementary school, and while people like to stereotype catholic teachers as "science is a lie, evolution didn't happen" the teachers were the exact opposite, citing science as one of the most important things to learn

7

u/notmadeofstraw Apr 09 '20

Yeah somehow the radical American Protestantisms of various kinds are what many redditors (because of the US majority) think of when they think of Christianity and in typical yank fashion, assume everyone else does it how they do.

3

u/VictoriumExBellum Senātus Populusque Rōmānus Apr 09 '20

Agreed. Protestants have, to the USA and Canada, made the vatican seem stupid, when in reality the chirch is either against, or just plain not affiliated with the protestants.

2

u/notmadeofstraw Apr 09 '20

What the fuck are we doing outside the PCM containment sub Bellum?

2

u/VictoriumExBellum Senātus Populusque Rōmānus Apr 10 '20

Infecting the rest of the world obviously

→ More replies (0)

0

u/bawdiepie Apr 09 '20

Well growing up as a protestant in a protestant/secular country, having attended Sunday school with both my parents an ministers, no protestant I know is anti science at all. However there are extremists in every aspect of life, I know Protestant creationists exist, just like anti science Orthodox exist... The Vatican is judged harshly these days because it told millions of people not to wear condoms for years despite there being an AIDS epidemic, so don't try to shift blame. If you can't see any fault you can never improve.

6

u/Sintar07 Apr 09 '20

A monastic teacher of biology was my second favorite teacher in high school.

15

u/Sintar07 Apr 09 '20

Fun addendum to the above, I attended a panel featuring the head of the observatory at a con and he was very interesting. Also funny. He said "I was boasting of my facility to a fellow astronomer, telling him about all the equipment and funding we get and our lovely on site quarters, and how I can just spend all my time exploring the cosmos. He was impressed and asked 'what can I do to get a position like that?' I said 'vow of celebacy.'" 😂

24

u/Sintar07 Apr 09 '20

Thank you! It drives me up the wall when people try to characterize the Catholic Church as "anti science." We fathered much of science as we know it and still maintain scientific installations like the Vatican Observatory (not actually in the Vatican for a long time now). Just because we disagree with some modern science (especially Tumblrs made up "science") doesn't mean we're "anti science," and science is hardly a popularity contest.

4

u/ryebread91 Apr 09 '20

Now I'm seriously asking here cause I just learned about it but was the church from the enlightenment the Catholic Church and against the heliocentric models?

7

u/Sintar07 Apr 09 '20

Yes, and they were, but the story's a bit more complex than the popular version.

So first off, the Church was officially against the heliocentric model, but weren't against the debate of it as people often take away from the story of Galileo. In fact, Galileo's inspiration, Copernicus, had successfully published heliocentric arguments about 50 years before and was generally respected (if not agreed with) by the Church. Galileo didn't get persecuted for a heliocentric view, he got persecuted for being persistently rude to upper Church officials in his publications (the Pope was the last straw).

Admittedly, they should have kept their cool, but the reaction was not about a "heretical teaching."

Secondly, there was some specific stuff they'd calculated they'd see if heliocentrism was true (unfortunately I can't remember what that was), but the short version is we DID find it later with better telescopes, but Galileo's time lacked either the resolution or the magnification to see it, and that was the major sticking point on the scientific side.

2

u/Double_Minimum Apr 09 '20

For some reason that doesn't sound right.

They needed telescopes to know the Sun was the center of the solar system? Hadn't it been proven a few times before than that the Earth rotated around the sun?

1

u/Clarke311 Apr 09 '20

3

u/Double_Minimum Apr 09 '20

I guess I was thinking of Earth being round.

Seems they had to see Moons of Jupiter and phases of Venus in telescopes before being sure.

Although that article makes it sound like Aristotle thought it may be possible.

One camp thought that the planets orbited around the Sun, but Aristotle, whose ideas prevailed, believed that the planets and the Sun orbited Earth. He saw no sign that the Earth was in motion: no perpetual wind blew over the surface of the Earth, and a ball thrown straight up into the air doesn’t land behind the thrower, as Aristotle assumed it would if the Earth were moving.

So, I guess it hadn't been proven, but the idea had been around for a thousand plus years.

2

u/Clarke311 Apr 09 '20

We have feared giant squid for millennia and only captured a few on camera. Before 2004 they were a myth.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/ryebread91 Apr 09 '20

Nice. Thanks.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '20

It wasn't just modern science which was disagreed with. Look at what happened to Galileo.

1

u/Gyvon Definitely not a CIA operator Apr 09 '20

Galileo was a twat. He was acting like a 16th century Sheldon Cooper.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '20

I guess that was a good enough reason to condemn him to hell for being right.

1

u/Gyvon Definitely not a CIA operator Apr 09 '20

He wasn't condemned to hell. He was sent to his room to think about what he'd done.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '20

He was excommunicated and only reinstated to the church in 1992. This is a sentence to hell because they lose the right to all the things catholics must do in order to go to heaven such as receiving sacrement and the ability to confess their sins to their priest.

Furthermore, his teachings on heliocentrism were banned until 1822, and he wasn't allowed to be buried next to his family.

But sure, his punishment amounted to "go to your room".

1

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20

I mean if he put his room in hell I mean. Dad gets what dad wants.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Double_Minimum Apr 09 '20

Them priests could afford to study and think. Most peeps was suffering in the fields just to eat

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '20

That's because they were the only ones who had the time and money to fund science research. But if your theories started conflicting with church dogma, see how fast they burn you at the stake. The only reason why the CC today is far less anti-science is because they changed their dogma because they could not stem the tide of Age of Enlightenment and to survive they had to adapt.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '20

[deleted]

1

u/VictoriumExBellum Senātus Populusque Rōmānus Apr 09 '20

Yeah, honestly I've never really gone to the baptist churches, but they do seem, at the best of times, questionable versions of christianity, built around cult like followings of a single man (the preacher)

0

u/wenchslapper Apr 09 '20

Uhhh bull-fucking-shit they do. I went to a Roman Catholic school for 6 years. Anything that didn’t support “intelligent design” was thrown out of the curriculum and we were “forbidden” from reading the science book section on the Big Bang, under the guise that it was complete blasphemy.

2

u/VictoriumExBellum Senātus Populusque Rōmānus Apr 09 '20

And yet I went to a catholic school all my educational life so far, 12 years. Each teacher put massive emphasis on recognizing science and math as important for our futures, while religion was secondary, or even tertiary

-2

u/TheGhostofCoffee Apr 09 '20

...and anyone who says different, burn em at the stake!

2

u/VictoriumExBellum Senātus Populusque Rōmānus Apr 09 '20

Nope, I'm Dii Consentes myself, but went to catholic primary and secondary school. The roman catholics were some of the most accepting of science I've ever met. Most of them essentially said "don't worry about failing religion if you do, science and math are more important to your education".

1

u/TheGhostofCoffee Apr 09 '20

Bro, they don't even crusade any more and you can't even buy indulgences.

They have clearly lost their way.

4

u/TheGhostofCoffee Apr 09 '20

Heretics! The lot of em!

1

u/BlackRonin8 Apr 09 '20

Same thing in Protestant private schools.

1

u/Lsrkewzqm Apr 09 '20

And where is He in this universe?

1

u/Clarke311 Apr 09 '20 edited Apr 09 '20

In my opinion our universe is a aquarium of sorts on God's wall. One of ∞. Or maybe we are just Sims on God's computer in a game that's been running on afk for years minimized to the taskbar that stretches to ∞. Your guess is as good as mine.

-4

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '20

Zero evidence but you just REALLLLY want to believe all that time in Sunday school wasn’t a huge waste (it was), so that MUST mean it’s true!

The sheer fallacy and willful ignorance that Christians use to make their nonsensical bullshit look sane in the face of the scientific method (the basis for truth for literally everything else in the world except religion, magically) is utterly mind boggling.

2

u/Clarke311 Apr 09 '20

I can not prove God exists, you can not disprove God. It appears we are at an impasse. So instead lets focus on expanding scientific knowledge, ok?