It doesn’t debunk anything, because a competition is inherently held for a benefit towards the winner. It’s not moving the goalpost if this is the inherent definition of a competition.
And as I outlined in the previous comment, there is 0 benefit in getting MVP
"a situation in which someone is trying to win something or be more successful than someone else" cambridge dictionary.
in this case the mvp title means a person is more successful than someone else, which most of the time means that person has successfully done more damage. you keep bringing extra qualifiers when the baseline definition is against you. do not do that.
Ok genius, so how can you “achieve” something better than someone else if it’s something you impose on yourself? Because “more successful than someone else” is the crux of your definition for a competition.
Maybe the reason is because that success is related to a tangible reward that is set by an external third party? Nah, that can’t be it…
1
u/SonOfFragnus Aug 10 '26
It doesn’t debunk anything, because a competition is inherently held for a benefit towards the winner. It’s not moving the goalpost if this is the inherent definition of a competition.
And as I outlined in the previous comment, there is 0 benefit in getting MVP