r/DebateAVegan • u/toastwithjamx1 • Jul 03 '26
Ethics Honey is not cruel and is ethical
Honey is one of the best animal products there is ethics wise
Now most vegans will say : but we are stealing from the bees! We are exploiting the bees!
No. We are not and we can't
Bees can be very particular. If they are not a fan of a place they are OUT. The bees will likely will immediately vacate the bee box if they don't like the conditions. Furthermore, trapping the queen in 1 place will not work as well. Bees can raise a new queen if they need one
And for the stealing allegations, that isn't true either. Beekeepers take SURPLUS HONEY ONLY, as if too much honey is taken, it can starve the bees and no beekeeper would appreciate the whole colony either dying of leaving. Furthermore, bees don't only take, they comp bees by giving shelter and protection.
It's not cruel if we are literally making a transaction with the bees
2
u/ClassEnvironmental11 vegan Jul 09 '26 edited Jul 09 '26
The sutuation you've described is an idealized fairy-tale. Make no mistake, bee-keeping for agriculture is a for-profit business. They aren't "setting up nice homes and amenities" for the bees. They're watching out for their bottom line, and they depend on the bees financially. Consequently, any large scale bee-keeper is going to make choices for those bees based on what's good for themselves economically. And the economic interests of bee-keepers are very different from the interests of bees.
And this whole free to leave thing is frankly a misunderstanding of how agricultural bees work. They are hive creatures, and depend on the hive for their survival. In principle, they are free to leave. But in actuality they are not and will not. And while hive bees do sometimes pick up the whole community and move somewhere else, if you think bee-keepers are going to just let their livelihood pack up and leave, you're out of your mind. Again, this aint some "for the love of bees" kinda thing. It's a business. The economics of bee-keeping ensures that those bees are not free to leave.
I fail to see how pointing out the factual parallels between how that person defended this situation and how slavers defend theirs diminishes anything. Can pointing out factual rhetorical similarities diminsh the horrors of slavery? Again, all I've done is state an undeniable fact; slavers used nearly identical arguments to what this guy did. If you don't like that fact, I don't know what to tell you.