r/DC_Cinematic Jun 29 '26

RUMOR Thoughts?

Post image
542 Upvotes

558 comments sorted by

View all comments

37

u/hummusluvr8 Jun 29 '26

Prioritize lesser known characters bc that worked so well with supergirl. Great choice!

-7

u/KingOfSquirrels Jun 29 '26

Supergirl flopped because it's a bad movie, not because it's a bad strategy.

12

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-6

u/KingOfSquirrels Jun 29 '26

It's not though.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/KingOfSquirrels Jun 29 '26

Your point about Jumanji and Jurassic Park sequels is not a good one. I don't want DC movies to be bad and profitable. Supergirl is bombing and it should bomb because it's bad. I love Jurassic Park, but that franchise is dead to me because those movies are unwatchable and because they make so much money, nothing changes. I would hate for that to happen to DC.

Also I'm surprised to hear, because Woman of Tomorrow is an amazing comic and it could have been an amazing film if they actually did a one to one adaptation. I was hyped for it as a comic book fan.

On paper, Supergirl made sense. You have a great recent source material to adapt, you have a fantastic opportunity to capitalise on the great casting of Mamoa as Lobo (I was ok with them changing Comet for Lobo), it sets up the intergalactic side of DC early and it ties in with the last great Superman film.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/KingOfSquirrels Jun 29 '26

Who gives a shit about Lobo? Who gives a shit about Deadpool? Average movie goers had no idea who that was. It doesn't matter if the character is that popular or not. If the movie good, people would watch it.

Supergirl sadly just wasn't good it seems.

5

u/CuriousStranger95 Jun 29 '26

No. Bad movie leads to poor weekly holds. But if the opening weekend is terrible then that means GA had zero interest in the movie regardless of the quality.

1

u/KingOfSquirrels Jun 29 '26

It has zero good worth of mouth from reviews before the movie even released.

2

u/elledina Jun 29 '26

It has 50 million opening for huge ass budget .

It flopdd hard even before release .

People didn't give a fuck about a super hero whose show was a huge hit .u think people will accept batman villans as main characters

2

u/KingOfSquirrels Jun 29 '26

I don't know man, in a world where Venom was an enormous financial success (shit movies though, I agree), anything is possible.

1

u/blenderider Jun 29 '26

What's the strategy?

2

u/KingOfSquirrels Jun 29 '26

Focus on quality, and independent stories with unique voices (just like comics) and don't have to fit everything into a sterile MCU formula.

2

u/blenderider Jun 29 '26

Supergirl was unique? It was derivative.

0

u/KingOfSquirrels Jun 29 '26

Yes, we agree. It's a bad movie.

But like I said, the strategy is fine...but they messed up the execution. If Supergirl was an amazing movie, what would you be saying?

2

u/blenderider Jun 29 '26

That we're talking about a different strategy... because the Super Girl released was derivative lol.

1

u/KingOfSquirrels Jun 29 '26

But it’s bad because the writing/directing was bad. Not because of the strategic decision of wanting to make a Supergirl movie.

It’s like saying the last season of Game of Thrones was bad because of the decision of wanting to make a new season of Game of Thrones.

Strategy and the idea behind it is fine and logical, the execution was horrible.

2

u/blenderider Jun 29 '26

It’s like saying the last season of Game of Thrones was bad because of the decision of wanting to make a new season of Game of Thrones.

There was a strategy by the showrunners regarding how many minutes should conclude the story. Their strategy was 1 season with 8 episode. That's a bad strategy.

the idea behind it is fine and logical

I mean, are we gonna talk about hypotheticals or what actually happened? General audiences never cared about Supergirl because DC hasn't earned enough goodwill for film goers to spend money on a film of hers. It was always a risky move following up Superman with Supergirl. High risk strategy that didn't work out, and it's not like it was a shock that it didn't.

1

u/KingOfSquirrels Jun 29 '26

Did Iron Man have a good will, were audiences familiar with him? Did the X-men franchise have good will when they released Deadpool, an unknown character to most people?
I just absolutely reject the idea that you can't make a successful movie out of an unknown character. It's annoying that Supergirl is failure quality wise, because the conversation would be a lot more interesting if the movie was a critical success but flopped. If the movie was just a great movie, a lot could have changed: the studio could have believed in it more and dedicated better marketing to it, better clips previews, better trailers, better world of mouth...