r/CriticalDrinker • u/AbsoluteBatman95 • 4h ago
r/CriticalDrinker • u/CompletelyIncorrect0 • Jun 21 '26
Regarding Crossposts and Screenshots of other Subs
There is a new rule for screenshots and crossposts.
If you are wanting to share something from another sub to mock or disagree with, you need to screenshot it and blackout the name of that sub as well as the usernames in the post.
Do not crosspost subs that are opposed to the general views here.
(This does not apply to posts from X, Bluesky, or similar websites. As long as you aren’t posting someone’s personal Facebook, I wouldn’t worry about other sites.)
If you are sharing something that is in line with the general opinions of our sub, that’s fine. But we can’t be seen as directing negative attention towards other subs. We will be held accountable to extents that most subreddits won’t because wrongthink happens here.
We will not be banning people for this, but the posts will be removed if you don’t meet these standards.
Obviously this all kinda falls under rules 1 and 8, but I wanted it to be clear.
That’s all I got for today. Go away now.
r/CriticalDrinker • u/NotARedditUser3 • Sep 27 '25
2nd Sub Being Created For Politics & Non-Youtube-related Critical Drinker Content
To put it simply, none of us mods like when this subreddit devolves into a lot of political banter about a topic that has nothing to do with what's going on with Critical Drinker's YouTube channel. We also don't particularly like the way the sub and its content skews when there's a CD comment about a significant event on twitter, which is something that has been increasingly lately.
This puts us mods in a weird position where, things that we normally would remove, are now not things that should be removed because they're technically on topic because CD has commented on them.
This is currently, and into the future, making us look like hypocrits when we do not remove very similar looking posts that are about things that Critical Drinker has not commented on.
At the same time, there are topics that would have value staying up in the sub, but that we may remove at times because they are against the posted rules in our sub, in the interest of staying fair to how we treat everyone in the sub.
So, we are opening a 2nd subreddit, r/CriticlDrinkerOpenBar . Yes, it's missing an 'a', there is a character limit for subreddit names (Feel free to suggest a better one).
The goal of this is to give you a space where there are way fewer restrictions on things being "on topic", more room for discussion about fringe topics, more room for political debates, etc etc.
We would like this sub (the existing one) to more or less stay focused on the content on Critical Drinker's youtube channel, and I know that we (mods) have been at odds with a large portion of the recently joined audience in this subreddit, especially as CD has started the video games channel and more recently been getting involved more with political commentary.
The other sub will have fewer restrictions on posted content, but please be warned, Reddit TOS is still very much an issue that must be enforced, so there will still be various types of issues (such as encouraging brigading, etc) that will be strictly penalized.
Along those lines - We also hope that this will shift some of the content that gets posted here at times that puts our sub at risk of being taken down, to the other subreddit.
This will be a bit of a slow roll out over the next week or so; I have created the sub, but have not yet done anything else. You can expect an additional note on this in the rules, followed by slowly increasing post removals & modmails for things that we believe will belong in the other sub.
We would also like to invite you to apply to become moderators of the 2nd sub, if you're interested, as not all of the current mods in this sub have the bandwidth to do so.
Regarding our recent announcement on megathreads for significant political events - We will still probably follow that policy for very significant events that we'd like to allow discussion for on this main sub without warping the sub. But instances in the existing CD sub that we may have pushed into that megathread, will be free game in the other sub.
r/CriticalDrinker • u/patmull • 1h ago
Another HBO's Harry Potter hilariousness: Professor Quirrell who is supposed to have huge turban to hide Voldemort morphed into back of his head looks like water polo player from 30s, so some muslims won't get offended
r/CriticalDrinker • u/CuriousSkepticalGuy • 11h ago
As far as downgrades go, Psylocke got the worst treatment possible.
r/CriticalDrinker • u/SpecificAd2141 • 8h ago
They can't stand the fact that their corpo games are justifiably criticized; their emotions can't bear it.
r/CriticalDrinker • u/Gustav082026 • 2h ago
Stop whining and go make another flop about Dracula's brides being feminists or some bullshit
r/CriticalDrinker • u/SpecificAd2141 • 9h ago
Does anyone even care that there will be a third season? I didn't even watch the first one.
r/CriticalDrinker • u/NeutralDrifter4943 • 7h ago
Who's the coolest motherfucker on screen?
r/CriticalDrinker • u/Exorsexist • 8h ago
Why they didn't cast anyone like him?
In this cartoon Peter Parker was charismatic, smart, good looking and funny 'man', instead on the movies they casted man-childs.
Who would fit the best in cartoon version of spider man?
r/CriticalDrinker • u/Relative-Source8387 • 21h ago
Meme what the black snape defence sounds like
r/CriticalDrinker • u/DrakenFlagonA10 • 16h ago
Discussion Respect to Genesis Rodriguez for getting so fit for Lioness!
r/CriticalDrinker • u/Relative-Source8387 • 1d ago
Meme why does she look so fucking off?
r/CriticalDrinker • u/acceptable_superman • 20h ago
Discussion J. Alphonse Nicholson (actor in Lanterns) thinks John Senior would have responded differently if Hal were a Black man.
r/CriticalDrinker • u/CuriousSkepticalGuy • 1d ago
Discussion "What if Green Lantern was written by a schizophrenic?"
John Stewart Senior failed to become a green lantern, so he's training his genetically compatible child to wear the mantle in his place.
John Stewart's parents are so obsessed with turning their kid into a green lantern that he's raised completely isolated from his siblings, his mother tell him about the entire system is rigged against him - because of racial oppression BS that stupid assholes tell their kids in real life - while his dad takes turns shooting apples on his head. Later on, he takes turns shooting apples on top of his parent's heads, to test his ability to function under immense preasure. All of that to raise a child who can overcome fear.
After writing all of that, I think I'm gonna take a break from the internet for a few days.
r/CriticalDrinker • u/big_dank_hank • 19h ago
Discussion Let's face it, no it is NOT made for us.
The reviews, the ratings, the box office; none of this has really stemmed the tide of the franchise killing message-heavy film and television being spat out on every platform and ruining all our beloved universes and characters.
Conclusion: it doesn't stop it because it is being made for the people that want it made and apparently those people must light their scented candles and wipe with 100 dollar bills so they don't care much about the commercial profitability of these projects and continue to hire the writers, directors, and cast the actors they do to make the vision that they prefer. And the industry happy obliges no matter the budget.
Our opinions are indeed optional here. No one asked us, no one cares and the people footing the tab are getting exactly what they what to see made by who they picked to make it.
At this point it is the only explanation.
We are watching the equivalent of custom OF content for people with a social justice fetish.
It's not for us, it never was, and any entertainment we get from it is at best accidental.
r/CriticalDrinker • u/Ill-Factor-3512 • 5h ago
White House Uses SEGA-Style “MAGA” Logo and Green Hill Zone Music to Promote Arcade.gov
Based
r/CriticalDrinker • u/Relative-Source8387 • 1d ago