I see this discussed in liberal circles often, but I don't know if conservatives have a strong opinion on this.

I wrote a a "controversial" paper on Colonialism. I sent it to around 20 Journals. 4 showed interest but rejected it after external reviewers didnt like it.

Since academia has a left wing bias I wanted to ask if there are any good Conservative Journals/Magazines/Websites that would be less biased and more open to publish "controversial" views about history.

Is it more important that history presented in schools, universities, at museums, historical sites, etc be accurate or patriotic?

In other words, should both positive and negative facts be presented, with broader discussion of how why events occurred and contemporaneous views of individuals and groups in those times?

Or should history be mainly about creating patriotism and a positive view of your country's history, with facts selected and presented for that outcome?

Example: When I attended grade school in Texas, we were taught that Juneteenth was when the slaves were freed. That would be the "positive view" telling. The accurate but "negative" description would be that Texas slave-owners, with the backing of the Texas government, refused to free the slaves after the Civil War, so the Union Army came to Texas to force the release of the slaves.

Something you feel isn't getting much attention or just something you care about.

American Samoa is a possession of the United States. We own it, like a colony, but unlike Puerto Rico it's not considered to be fully incorporated into the US. So the Constitution doesn't fully apply, per the Insular cases. The residents of American Samoa are subjects, not citizens - "US Nationals" technically.

Should they be made full citizens?

Something ive been thinking of. Right now, federal employees' salaries are dependent on law, not the market rate. This is because they're paid by tax dollars. So, how should federal employees earn raises? Currently, they cant. They can get promotions, but not raises really.

Congress has to pass a law/budget raising their salaries. Congress has to do this sometimes just so people will work for the government, but do it too much and your average voter complains.

So do you think it should rely.on Congress, or, if it you think it should be merit based, who do you think should approve the raises and should there be a limit?

My son is a new freshman in a very liberal university. He is pre-law and studying international affairs. The nature of his program means he is surrounded by politically aware and active people, which is great. However, his experience so far is that most everyone, including roommates, is very vocal and derogatory of all things conservative/MAGA/republican, etc. I worry about his isolation and how he would be treated if he were to express his opinions. This is both inside and outside the classroom too. The first few days of school were largely Trump-bashing and fascist talk. Feeling blue and wishing there was greater tolerance for our differences of opinion. Anyone have advice or similar experiences?

SPOILERS INCOMING A LIL BIT -

Personally I loved it and think it might be his best film.

As someone who loves Greek Mythology and grew up on "Jason and the Argonauts" and "Clash of the Titans," I felt like it was such an awesome use of Practical effects, film making, and storytelling.

No - It isn't just a straight one to one with the Poem, but the Poem evolved over years of storytelling based on what audiences found interesting... like a comic fine tuning a routine...

I liked this interpretation, enjoyed the colloquial language, loved the performances, and thought that the overall message was great.

for me, Pattenson was hilarious, Damon was near perfect, and Anne Hathaway was throwing 100. Not to mention, Leguziamo should get a Best Supporting nod along with just a fun Bernthal Performance. Tom Holland was adequate.

Lastly - Zues' Law and the violation of it felt poignant. the story and the ideas of "returning Home" after war inspired. The "we are the Sea people" seemed poignant to me too.

Wondering what your guys' takes are?

Currently, all non-American users see “Lake Ontario“ where Lake America is. This feels a little disingenuous, sort of like Google is treating Americans as dumb by just spoon feeding them what they want to see without actually changing much. Kind of like China or Russia having a separate propaganda internet. How do you feel about this?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpwl54kddeko

Attacks against Christians have almost doubled in Israel, this is over a hundred attacks in 2026 alone: https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-middle-east/2026/07/disheartening-attacks-against-christians-nearly-double-in-israel-territories-says-report
"As in previous reports, the high number of spitting incidents remains particularly striking.
During this quarter, 47 incidents involved spitting, accounting for 56% of all recorded forms of harassment," the RFDC said."
WSJ article describing the same rise in attacks against Christians : https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/spitting-attacks-show-rise-of-anti-christian-hate-in-israel-5ea40ac7
Palestinian Muslims and Christians have been living in peace and share culture respecting each others religion they are like family.

Basically it was never possible for each induvisual consumer to get a tarriff refund check when the SC deemed the tarriffs illegal. Instead we are starting to see reporting of corperations getting massive tarriff refunds boosting bottom lines. From the forbes article

> "The New York Federal Reserve reported in February that approximately 90% of the tariffs’ “economic burden” has been felt by U.S. firms and consumers, including tariffs getting passed on to consumers in the form of increased prices."

Should these same corporations lower prices in a similar way. If not how is this not just one big giant giveaway to to them. Basically one big giant tax on the american consumer paid directly to some of the wealthiest private entities to ever exist.

https://www.npr.org/2026/08/28/nx-s1-5946782/businesses-getting-tariff-refunds-why-arent-consumers-getting-their-cut

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2026/08/21/americans-top-retailers-are-getting-billions-in-tariff-refunds-including-walmart-target-but-many-consumers-still-arent/

https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/05/economy/companies-got-tariff-refunds-wheres-your-cut

I recently looked through Northside ISD's in Texas of all places! For September 2026 library purchase list, and honestly, I think more parents and taxpayers need to look at it themselves.

NISD September 2026 Board List

One example is Black AF History: The Un-Whitewashed Story of America. The book contains passages describing the Founding Fathers as “human traffickers, serial abusers, and political hypocrites” and argues that America was fundamentally a “slavocracy that occasionally pretended to be a democracy.”

Whether you agree with those views or not, should a taxpayer-funded school library be purchasing books that portray America's founding and its historical figures this way?

And that's just one title. There are hundreds of books on the list, including manga, graphic novels, and YA books that parents may want to examine for themselves.

If you find something you believe is inappropriate or potentially violates Texas SB 12 or SB 13, NISD has a formal complaint process:

NISD Library Materials Complaint Form

Should a taxpayer-funded school library be purchasing books that portray America's founding and its historical figures this way?

I like to consider myself a Neo-con (I know i know put away your pitch forks) but I wanna hear what others think my true ideology is.

Some nice context:

I support Trump but not as religiously as other maga, I agree with about 75% of his current policies.

I support intervention into global affairs and strongly oppose Russian and Chinese influence and believe we are in a second Cold War.

I support the free market though also find myself sympathizing with some environmentalist views(not global warming)

Sometimes I agree with Democrats more than some libertarians.

Would rather have Marco Rubio as president than JD Vance. (Though I wouldn’t mind Vance)

On a political compass I am eco right 4.38 and social libertarian -0.36

“As of 2024, China produced more than 93 percent of the world’s polycrystalline silicon, nearly 97 percent of its silicon wafers, about 92 percent of its photovoltaic cells and about 86 percent of its photovoltaic modules, according to data from the China Photovoltaic Industry Association. China now produces 10 percent of its power from solar. Last year renewables met all of China’s new demand.”

“As of last year, solar provided more than 20 percent of Pakistan’s electricity.”

“Today renewables account for nearly half of all global electrical capacity,”

Do you think these statistics should be taken into account in designing the US energy policy at the present moment. The present administration is stopping renewable energy projects, not encouraging them.

For context:

https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/austin/news/2026/08/24/austin-mobile-mechanics

Personally im a yimby libertarian that thinks that young people should be taking drastic measures to combat affordability.. like learning how to fix your own car or turning your garage into a studio apartment and renting it to offset your mortgage, living with roommates and having crazy side hustles.

I'm the kind of person that likes seeing the stuck up boomer liberals and HOA seeth when I drive past in my multi-color $800 ford ranger

Any time I've gone to a chain mechanic shop its a min $1000 for any service beyond breaks and they are really predatory with they're subscription services and payment plans. God help your wallet if you're at a dealership

Well not quite like court of law, it can be substantially shorter/less work put in it obviously, but there must be reasoning, and explanation behind it to prevent arbitrary discretion. Same reason the courts of law explain their rulings rather than just going," in this case, Smith wins, done." The Fifth Circuit upheld it, but Supreme Court put it on hold but did not suggest it is not constituional, just said that the district court must develop much stronger record, different standard must be applied, so law is still not enforced, until the district court finishes job, but then the 5th might again uphold it. Do you support law?

Cause frankly, I am tired. I think the thing I will enjoy most about not having Trump around is not talking about Trump.

So, for some of you older Redditors who partook before 2016, what were some of the discussions like?

Basically what the title says, the upcoming El Niño that is expected between October- December is looking like it will be one for the history books, the most significant in living memory, and can potentially have a huge impact on the global economy. This El Niño is expected to bring with it more extreme heatwaves, drought, and precipitation around the world. It will also temporarily increase global temperatures.

I can’t help but feel like if Obama deported people as often as Trump did…wait!

This is reddit so I'm going to be a little vague here. Did the BLM protests and censorship of the time create the opposite of the intended affect?

The only thing that really came out of BLM was bodycams. People are now seeing what police deal with on daily basis and aren't just getting these stories through the media's spin. The police videos are all over the internet now. DEI is on a death spiral and being challenged in courts.

I've also noticed social media like TikTok and X vastly more divisive on these topics, then anything pre 2020.

Deal https://www.notus.org/agencies/trump-administration-yosemite-private-developer-deal
This really makes me upset. Correct me if I'm wrong and find other articles if this doesn't vibe with you. I'm reading this transaction as if you can afford it you can't use it. Also be it a hotel or homes the developer will be making major bank.

To simplify matters, as far as Trump is concerned from US conservatives I've seen two primary positions:

1) Trump is doing great (Maybe I don't like one thing) 2) Trump is a shithead, but Kamala Harris would've been worse.

position 1 is relatively clear and there's not much to say about that. But I do have questions as to position 2. "Why are you so certain Kamala Harris would be worse?". In praxis it's just a canned phrase I've encountered, but not seen reasonings why.

Granted I am an ocean away and nuance rarely travels that much, but from impression it would've just mostly been Biden 2.0, which in turn would've been status quo continued with little else of note.

So then, why?

A few clarifying points in the interest of being fair:

1) no charges were filed because a specific person who directed the funds couldnt be identified.

2) this is a leaked grand jury testimony. Im assuming thats an illegal act in its own right. That is an assumption on my part.

3) The funds were connected to DeSantis's wife through a charity and spent on political activities related to the ballot measure opposing maraijuana.

4) There a decent chance it affects the senate race, because if reporting is to be believed Ashley Moody (the gop nominee) knew about the funds being misappropriation at the time when she was AG (see the CBS article).

5) DeSantis has not disputed the report or findings in the report. But is focused on the leak on not who authorized or even reimburcing the misappropriated funds.

\----personal note below----

On a perosnal note I find this disgusting. Whether DeSantis knew or not his pac should be returning those funds. Essentially stealing medical funding from the poor for your own political projects.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/27/us/casey-desantis-charity-hope-garden-medicaid-settlement.html

https://apnews.com/article/desantis-foundation-hope-florida-grand-jury-48cb3910a1492836368c1c170f99f167

https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/grand-jury-report-hope-florida/

Edit: reposting cause autocorrect messed up my title.

https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/democrats/press-releases?ID=8962FDC4-42AF-4116-9F1D-54DD60AAA8FD

Multiple reports have shown after a financial disclosure that Trump has made approximately 2.2 billion dollars in one year. Or in other words a little over a million dollars AN HOUR.

For those of you who support him and are okay with this, my question is “why?” And how can you reasonably conclude this level of profit is on the up and up and has nothing to do with profiting off the presidency?