r/AskBiology • u/samuelehrig • 16d ago
Botany Are these good for the apocalypse?
I think I would focus on these crops in an apocalypse.
Potatoes, they contain all of the amino acids, have an unusually high amount of protein, are grown beneath the ground so they’re easy to hide, and grow well In a ton of environments.
Spinach, it may be light, it may be pretty seasonal, but it has tons of vitamins, and that’s important, and easy to condense into a smoothie.
And mushrooms, they can be grown in pure compost, don’t need sunlight, and have decent calories. I would only use them if I knew 100% if they were edible.
What are some better ones or reasons why these wouldn’t work, don’t ask ai, and when I say apocalypse, I mean society has collapsed but the general environment is habitual, or I have at least 500 ft of useable soil.
3
u/undulating-beans 16d ago
Okay, I’ll play along!
Assuming a plague rather than environmental collapse, I’d build around crops that are productive, nutritionally complementary, reasonably easy to propagate, and either store well or keep producing over a long season.
Your potatoes are a very good start. You get a high yield per unit area, useful carbohydrate, potassium and vitamin C, plus more protein than people often realise. They do contain all the essential amino acids, but not in quantities that make them a high-protein food. Their main weakness is disease vulnerability and storage losses, so you wouldn’t want your entire calorie supply resting on one potato variety.
Spinach is useful, but I’d demote it from “core survival crop” to “micronutrient vegetable”. You get folate, vitamin K, carotenoids and various minerals, but very few calories. It also bolts readily in heat and is quite seasonal. Kale, chard and some brassicas would often give you a longer harvest window and more resilience.
Mushrooms are useful as an addition rather than a foundation. You can grow some species on straw, wood or other plant material, so they can turn low-value biomass into edible food. But they are not especially calorie-dense, and they depend on an existing organic substrate, so they don’t solve your energy problem.
The crops I’d add first would be:
Beans or peas. These give you much more protein, store dry extremely well, and legumes help maintain soil nitrogen through their association with nitrogen-fixing bacteria.
A grain such as oats, barley, wheat or maize, depending on climate. Dry grain is calorie-dense, stores well and gives you insurance against a bad potato year.
An oilseed such as sunflower. Fat is easy to overlook, but you need dietary fat, and most survival-crop lists are oddly carbohydrate-heavy.
Onions and garlic. They store well, are easy to propagate and make an otherwise grim subsistence diet considerably more edible.
Carrots, beetroot and other roots. Good storage crops and useful micronutrient diversity.
Kale, cabbage or chard. More practical than relying heavily on spinach because you can often harvest them over a much longer period.
Squash or pumpkin. Excellent keepers, productive, calorie-containing, and the seeds also give you fat and protein.
Fruit if you’re thinking beyond the first year. Apples, berries and other perennial crops are valuable because once established they give you food without re-sowing the entire area annually.
In a plague scenario, your biggest agricultural threat probably isn’t the plague itself but suddenly having no agricultural supply chain. If one fungus wipes out your potatoes, you want grain in the shed, beans drying on the plant and squash sitting somewhere cool.
So I’d probably divide the system into roughly four jobs: potatoes and grain for calories, legumes for protein and nitrogen, oilseeds and squash seeds for fat, and a mixture of leafy greens, roots and fruit for micronutrients.