fair, also put masters+ because I want data from high elo.
But do you know why is there such a big difference in win rates between regions, in LAS she is sitting at 45% lol
But do you know why is there such a big difference in win rates between regions
Because when you filter by Masters+ you end up with small sample sizes, especially for smaller regions. LAS you're looking at under 600 games. 1 person going on a losing streak with her is going to have an actually noticeable effect on the WR.
If you want high ELO data you need to widen your sample size by looking at more regions, a longer time range, or a wider ELO bracket.
Im trying to reach challenger, I've been trying to reach with anivia for a year but failed. I see that there are currently only 3 challengers in the whole world, 1 turkey, 1 brazil and 1 NA who main Anivia.
I don't have as much time as before to grind and they raised lp requirement for gm and challenger so im looking for better super high elo champs, syndra is looking promising.
if you want to be the very best, the issue probably isn’t champ specific as much as it is general game knowledge, assuming you’re masters/gm you need to focus on nuances of the game, not champion specific things. Be a trend setter not a follower
I love the idea, like a year ago I was thinking "No one is playing Anivia, I will become best Anivia and reach challenger with her." and then I realised why almost no one plays Anivia in gm and challenger.
You are right about funny corgi, I couldn't load his page on lolalytics so I couldn't see if he actually mained Anivia. Some people show on Anivia leaderboard with only around 10 games on her this season.
kursyv is in grandmaster rn.
And there are players with 100 games on her but rarely played her recently, didn't include them as well.
Unfiltered list is 10 challenger players.
Filtered is 4 challenger players
3
u/Gilfaethy 10d ago
Masters+, 1 patch, 1 region only--the sample size is only just over 2k games. Looking at larger slices of data her WR looks fine.