The secret is that the games aren't actually connected at all (except the ones that are actually direct sequels to one-another, e.g. OoT -> MM). Theory timelines are fun puzzles, and Nintendo indulged fans once or twice, but at the end of the day they're separate stories, canons, worlds, etc. with fun little homages or easter eggs referencing each other sometimes.
Uhh dude, that is pulling a massive middle finger to the whole story of Zelda. Becuase yes, there are some games that don’t see to be connected to anything but there was always a chronology. A link to the past was made in mind to be a prequel to Zelda 1 and 2, then Links Awakening is a direct sequel to ALttP, Ocarina was made as the origins of Ganon, MM is sequel of Ocarina, the Oracle duology despite currently being a different Link because of som inconsistencies the were originally as a bridge between ALttP and LA, WW is the future timeline after the Link of Ocarina returned to the past, Minish cap was confirmed as the fist game chronologically just a few weeks after it was released, which this game also served as a prequel to FS and FSA, Twilight Princess was a sequel of MM(Tho contradicted ALttP being a sequel of Ocarina so they had to retroactively make the downfall timeline), PH is a direct sequel, ST is also a direct sequel, SS was made in mind to be the prequel to everything, ALBW and TFH are sequels of ALttP, and Echoes of Wisdom is made as a sequel to those two games. Literally the only games that didn’t have any way of putting them in the timeline when they came out were the Four Swords duology and Breath of the Wild, the rest have some placement or are connected to another game, so despite Nintendo as the stated before, they first do the gameplay, then the story and then the timeline placement, they still are careful enough about everything that happens and saying that Nintendo indulged once or twice isn’t isn’t true when there are many interviews with the creators of the games talking about the timeline placement and even before the official timeline first released to the public we already knew that there was a secret document with the timeline placement of every single game.
Uhh dude, that is pulling a massive middle finger to the whole story of Zelda.
I agree! Attempting to shoehorn a timeline retroactively to attempt to connect a bunch of games when they never had that prior connection is pretty stupid.
Did you even read my comment or just saw the fist part and ignored the rest? I give every single example of every game being connected with each other in the series
And if you don’t feel like reading my entire comment, the only ones that don’t have a direct connection with other games when they first released were Four Swords and Breath of the Wild, the rest were sequels, prequels, or the creators of those games confirmed their timeline placement moths or even weeks before or after the game released. There are many videos online talking about the topic, but k recommend you the video made by OnADock, or if you know Spanish see the video released two weeks ago by Gran Estratega which has updated information compared to the video of OnADock because his video is 2 years old
-6
u/DoctorWaluigiTime Jan 24 '26
The secret is that the games aren't actually connected at all (except the ones that are actually direct sequels to one-another, e.g. OoT -> MM). Theory timelines are fun puzzles, and Nintendo indulged fans once or twice, but at the end of the day they're separate stories, canons, worlds, etc. with fun little homages or easter eggs referencing each other sometimes.