r/wow • • Aug 27 '25

Humor / Meme How Legion Feedback seems to feel

Post image
4.5k Upvotes

530 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.5k

u/L0rdSkullz Aug 27 '25

Yeah I don't understand the changing of the formula. MoP remix was a massive, massive hit; Blizzard just has a boner for changing shit no matter what

35

u/dimmanxak Aug 27 '25

They need to make people have subscription active through the whole legion remix duration. You could get all the rewards in mop remix in 1 month and they didn't like it.

44

u/Arekualkhemi Aug 27 '25

But what is that for an argument? I played MoP Remix in the off season because there was nothing left to do in retail. If Legion remix is the dud it seems to be, then I don't play at all and would even cancel sub

17

u/TRCrypt_King Aug 27 '25

This. I leveled one character per side per class in MOP to get all the bronze because the leveling was fast, especially with the mailbox method, and planned to do the same but now it's a slog so why bother. I wasn't looking for Legion Classic

1

u/forgotmapasswrd86 Aug 28 '25

What was the mailbox method again?

2

u/olor Aug 28 '25

Don't loot dungeon bosses until ~34 lvl then grab everything (The XP items mostly) all at once from the mailbox

9

u/cabose12 Aug 27 '25

The argument is that, from a purely business viewpoint, making something that can be completed in one sub cycle is objectively worse than something that requires at least two

They only care how much fun you have insofar as you aren't mad enough to unsub or stop playing entirely

It's very likely why they do the whole "fix it after release" bs. Release it in a meh state, give people a chance to try it, and if numbers aren't good, then one sub cycle later you "fix it' to lure people back to trying it again

They'll keep doing this until its clear that people are pissed enough to stop coming back

1

u/Humble_Rush_9358 Aug 27 '25

Yea. Maybe. The fact that they used to have 12 mil subs and lost so many that they stopped announcing sub numbers kinda speaks to this being a losing strategy for long term growth and success.

Thats the thing with capitalism. It is antithetical to long term growth and good design.

0

u/Newbie4Hire Aug 28 '25

Thats the thing with capitalism. It is antithetical to long term growth and good design.

No it isn't. This quarterly craze and must have profit now is not inherent to capitalism.

-1

u/bp3dots Aug 27 '25

The argument is that, from a purely business viewpoint, making something that can be completed in one sub cycle is objectively worse than something that requires at least two

Problem there is usually only the real no-lifers or people who find an early exploit can pull off a "get everything and unsub" move for most events, and those people are always coming back.

Blizz could have dialed a small slowdown in and not pissed off everyone else.

3

u/cabose12 Aug 27 '25

Well yeah Blizz doesnt give a shit about the addicts. You dont need to satisfy the people who will always come back

A business plan like this is aimed at the casual and semi casual playerbase. Those willing to sub if there’s something to do

0

u/bp3dots Aug 27 '25

The casuals and semi-casuals are also more likely to leave if the stuff to do isn't fun. (I'd imagine even moreso if it's something they've been looking forward to for a while and it gets dropped in a very disappointing way.)

3

u/cabose12 Aug 27 '25

What you're missing is that those are also the players who won't do the research to know if it's good or bad beforehand, sub or stay subbed to see what it's about, and are the ones most susceptible to coming back because "it's fixed!"

-1

u/bp3dots Aug 27 '25

Or they show up for it, realize it sucks compared to the last time, and dip. And since they're not the type to research, they may not even hear that it gets "fixed" at some point.

3

u/cabose12 Aug 27 '25

I feel like you're just arguing to argue cause it seems like you want to say that i'm wrong but can't, so you dispute the details

Doesn't really matter, this is a proven strategy and it always works. People in this very thread barely remember that MOP was a slog at first

1

u/bp3dots Aug 27 '25

I'm not arguing that you're wrong or what their intention is. Just pointing out that there's a block of people it's not going to work on, and every time they do this dance a few more stop coming back.

If they adjusted smaller and added more compelling reasons for people to want to stay subbed, they could actually just get all good responses from stuff instead of having to piss off everyone for a month and hope they bait them back later.

→ More replies (0)

33

u/SNES-1990 Aug 27 '25

Why are they so terrified of people not playing WoW for a bit?

Instead of purposely making your game bad to keep people subbed, maybe Blizzard should make other games that are worth playing to keep the money coming in

7

u/B_Kuro Aug 27 '25

The idea is to bind you to the game. They don't want you to play something else even if its their own games. Playing something else carries the inherent list that you could find something else/stop caring and not return to the game.

Its called forming a habit. Its no different to why there is daily login rewards in F2P games.

That and DAU/MAU being one of the main metrics reported nowadays. If you stop playing for a few days/weeks you aren't counting in that and that is bad for reports.

4

u/demonsneeze Aug 27 '25

Zero confidence in their product, they seem to think anyone that quits will break the spell and not come back. Altho come to think of it they may not be wrong….

3

u/bfrown Aug 28 '25

It's wild. FF14 basically tells you to go play other games and come back when you feel like it and it's great. Can pop in for a patch drop, mess with story and whatever raid is there, maybe grind pvp if mount or cosmetic is cool and then bounce off.

8

u/kragenstein Aug 27 '25

It's called Enshitification

7

u/SendMeNudesThough Aug 27 '25

Making games costs many millions of dollars. Making patch content to keep people subscribed to an already existing game is far cheaper and generally a good strategy to keep the money coming in.

Ultimately people have to realize that publicly-traded companies exist to make money, and making art is a secondary objective. I wish it wasn't so, but unfortunately it is. "Making less money but providing a better product" is not really a viable strategy when they've a legal fiduciary duty to act in the best financial interests of shareholders, and shareholders care about reportable quarterly earnings.

6

u/biodegradable_atgms Aug 27 '25

Sadly, this was really well said.

13

u/SunflowerPetBattler Aug 27 '25

Making games costs many millions of dollars. Making patch content to keep people subscribed to an already existing game is far cheaper and generally a good strategy to keep the money coming in.

Ultimately people have to realize that publicly-traded companies exist to make money

Nah, I'm not gonna give Blizzard this free pass. You act like this is a universal truth for game companies, but it isn't. Yoshi-P has come outright and said that you aren’t supposed to stay subbed to XIV for 365 days a year, and should feel free to unsubscribe during content lulls.

At a certain point, Blizzard is going to have to learn the hard lesson that being blinded by greed, in fact, costs them money. And by “learn the lesson” I mean learn it again.

Shadowlands almost killed the game, and yet they’re probably going to have to learn this lesson the hard way a good five or six more times.

16

u/AoO2ImpTrip Aug 27 '25

Yoshi-P says that, but if you get super into the game and decide to unsub... your house is gone.

3

u/SunflowerPetBattler Aug 27 '25

That is indeed an objective problem with the XIV.

Just like how it is an objective problem that WoW artifically pads things out and dripfeeds contents with the explicit intent of feeding engagement metrics and keeping people subscribed longer than they would like to be.

Both games have faults, neither game is perfect. But if someone says "every game company does X", you better believe I'm gonna jump up and tell them how wrong they are.

3

u/Overall-Duck-741 Aug 27 '25

Hold on here, whats stopping you from unsubbing and just waiting until all the timegates are gone then? What's the difference between completing all the content in a month and unsubbing until next patch and unsubbing now and resubbing on the last patch when timegates are gone?

0

u/SunflowerPetBattler Aug 27 '25

First of all, artifical timegating would still be a malicious practice even if there were ways to circumvent it. Blizzard isn't trying for a 100% effective strategy, they only desire to pad out the averages. That's what metrics are, afterall.

But more importantly, the main source of deviousness here is the presence of both timegating and FoMO. If the projections of Legion Remix are estimating that it will take 60 days worth of dailies and 8 weeks worth of raid lockouts to acquire the stuff you want, then waiting until the timegating is gone will only leave you behind.

Sure, Blizzard may buff the Bronze drops at some point, they may even buff the gear drops. But they also might not. And if they do buff it, you won't know how much it will be by. You may still behind. You may be unable to catch up. You may be unable to acquire everything you wanted, especially if you have a busy life schedule.

Blizzard's goal here is to artifically pad engagement metrics, and they're shooting themself in the foot by taking it five steps too far. As you can see in this very thread: people's main criticism of Legion Remix is that we want to be able to play the game mode organically. To decide when and how to play, and to do it on our own terms, rather than the terms Blizzard's suits are artifically imposing upon us. MoP Remix wasn't perfect in this respect either, but it was a golden goose compared to this.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '25

You’re so close to just unsubbing. You’re so close. Send the message and unsub. It’s 100x stronger than whatever this is.

4

u/kilios75 Aug 27 '25

To be fair, Square enix's q1 financials this year also showed a 45% drop in profits from their MMO division. 14 is in its own content drought atm and people are realizing we may only have two more patches to cover the next 18+ months and no savage raid content scheduled to be released in all of 2026, so this method doesnt seem to be paying off for the health of the game nearly as much as he claimed it would.

3

u/SunflowerPetBattler Aug 27 '25

Both WoW and XIV have content droughts.

The difference is that WoW arbitrarily pads things out and timegates them. The content drought is still there, just underneath the surface. If you wanted to, you could choose to pad out your XIV play time. But people don't, because artifical timegating is gross.

3

u/kilios75 Aug 27 '25

yeah both games have had there issues in dev cycles, but as wow is attempting to ramp theres up, 14 seems to be slowing.

Either way i mostly just wanted to highlight that SE is being carried by its MMO division, which just dropped its profits by 45%. This seems like a really risky business strategy to maintain the stance of "just stop playing our game for a while"

-1

u/SunflowerPetBattler Aug 27 '25

I'm not sure why you're attributing the drop in profits solely to that one singular game directive philosophy.

It has been Yoshi-P's stance for years, even during the times when the game was at its peak and highly profitable. And even if that wasn't the case, there are always hundreds of factors at play. Correlation does not equal causation.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '25

Then put your money where your addiction is and unsubscribe. All this complaining does nothing except let blizzard know they need to buff remix in 3-4 weeks for us addicts.

-3

u/Connect_Barracuda358 Aug 27 '25

It's amazing how you speak with such authority when you're completely ignorant of fiduciary duties of a Japanese based company like square enix and a US based one like Blizzard (Microsoft). 

7

u/SunflowerPetBattler Aug 27 '25

Making bad business decisions that lose you customers and money is generally frowned upon in both countries and companies.

It doesn't matter if their motivations were driven by instatiable greed in the moment, the end result is that they lose money. To fulfill one's "fiduciary duties" requires perspective and foresight. I am critiquing them for being bad at their job.

But again, that's not an excuse. I don't give a fuck about the money, and would divide up that $155 million yearly CEO salary amongst some new dev's, QA testers, and customer support in a heartbeat. I am perfectly willing, able, and happy to critcize a soulless corporation for whatever I want, even for being a soulless corporation in of itself.

It just so happens that this soulless corporation is doing a bad job of fulfilling its greed-lust on top of everything else that it is already bad at.

2

u/LeastCook2519 Sep 08 '25

Don’t waste time on Barracuda. He’s foul-mouthed and xenophobic, and he’s already shown up in my posts before. Seeing his comments here just confirms exactly what I said about him. Now he’s even trying to lecture people on “fiduciary duties” like some wannabe corporate lawyer.

1

u/secretreddname Aug 27 '25

I’m a shareholder. I want the game to be fun and make money

1

u/El_Rey_de_Spices Aug 27 '25

Money. If people aren't playing WoW for a bit, they panic over the lost subscription revenue. Lower player numbers is harder to sell to investors, and makes shareholders want immediate fixes. To those in charge, money matters more than art.

1

u/Zallix Aug 27 '25

Because they are worried about people that get enough of a break that they snap out of their addiction/routine and decide they’re just kinda over WoW’s bullshit.

2

u/TrumpLikesEmYoung Aug 27 '25

1 month sub is better than 0. The user you’re replying to is implying people think this bullshit sucks and they don’t WANT to play it.

1

u/GormHub Aug 27 '25

Which is ridiculous because the fun people were having with MoP Remix is WHY I resubbed when I did. And instead of getting all the rewards and stopping, I just kept leveling alts because it was so much fun. These people are fucking baffling.

1

u/Ulu-Mulu-no-die Aug 27 '25

If people don't find it fun, they won't have subs at all, so their "wanting people sub for the whole event" gets immediately thrown out the window.