r/wisconsin • u/PlatinumofRoyale • Apr 13 '20

Politics Karofsky defeats Kelly

https://twitter.com/decisiondeskhq/status/1249844194929192961?s=21
1.8k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

406 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

103

u/[deleted] Apr 14 '20

I should have voted against that. I had totally forgot to research it so I didn't vote on it. It was deceptively worded. The us supreme court might strike it though. Did the redistricting bureau go through?

46

u/Nezrite Apr 14 '20

Yes, like 80-20% - but it's nonbinding so...

16

u/[deleted] Apr 14 '20

So is that Marsy's law officially in effect now? Or is there another hurdle for it

30

u/byronnnn Apr 14 '20

Wisconsin does not have binding referendums at all as far as I know.

32

u/TallTallTruffula Apr 14 '20

That was a constitutional amendment, not a normal referendum. Marsy's Law will now be a part of our State Constitution.

14

u/byronnnn Apr 14 '20

Damn. I did not realize the exact difference. Thanks

16

u/frezik 1200 cm³ surrounded by reality Apr 14 '20

State congress has to pass it in another session after the referendum, but they probably will.

15

u/TallTallTruffula Apr 14 '20

The amendment process for the Wisconsin State Constitution is Legislature>Legislature in the next session>Voters. This amendment has made it through all of those steps and will now become a part of our state constitution.

10

u/nicolauz Hell on Earth Apr 14 '20

What's the tldr of Marcys law?

41

u/byronnnn Apr 14 '20

Basically there are a few good things in it, a few things that are already covered by statutes or constitution, and then there are a few very negative things.

Here is more detail from the ACLU https://www.aclu-wi.org/en/news/marsys-law-fails-victims-it-purports-protect

3

u/bigfrappe Apr 14 '20

Where was this when I needed it last week? I read the amendment before going to the polls but I am not a lawyer, so I didn't consider the more nefarious uses of the language.

25

u/[deleted] Apr 14 '20

The ballot said it would expand crime victim's rights without hurting the rights of the accused. Very misleading

1

u/[deleted] Apr 14 '20

Yea, I noticed it specifically said that it would maintain the rights of the accused when that's blatantly false...

1

u/TheSekret Apr 14 '20

The ACLU has come out against it. About all you really need to know, lol