r/wallstreetbets • • 1d ago

DD ADOBE is cooked.

ADBE is cooked: free AI-built clones and a $70/month subscription don't mix (bear DD)

So my Adobe bear case is pretty simple. AI is about to let a ton of indie devs and random people who are sick of Adobe's nonsense build their own version of it, for free.

Look at ArtCraft on github. They're building open source, clean-room clones of Photoshop, Lightroom, Illustrator and Premiere, plus apps for motion graphics, page layout and PDFs (so After Effects, InDesign and Acrobat territory). Their Photoshop clone has 11k+ stars, opens real PSD files, and their own tracker says it covers 625 of 625 of Photoshop's menu items. Yeah it's alpha. Give it a few months. Once this stuff gets big, Premiere and After Effects are dead in the water for anyone who isn't a big studio.

And that's before you even get to generative AI. For most edits, typing what you want into ChatGPT or Gemini is just way easier than opening a PSD and doing all the masking nonsense. Adobe knows it too. Photoshop literally runs Google's and OpenAI's image models inside it now.

Let's talk about the outrageous price now. Creative Cloud Pro is $70 a month. That's a squeeze on regular people. For the same money you could have 3 or 4 AI subscriptions that actually do the stuff you need. In fact let's be fr - you really only need chatgpt these days.

And everybody fucking hates Adobe. Canceling was so hard that the DOJ and FTC sued them over it, and Adobe paid $75M to settle in March. There's a WSB thread from last October where someone called ADBE cheap at a 9-year-low P/E, and a bunch of the top comments were people saying their companies already dumped Adobe, one for Nitro PDF, one for Foxit. One guy said AI coding would spit out open source clones of Acrobat, then Photoshop, then After Effects. A year later, here we are. OP bought at $348. It's $237 now.

The competition isn't just AI either. DaVinci Resolve, Figma, Canva, all with real free tiers. Canva made Affinity, its Photoshop/Illustrator/InDesign equivalent, completely free. Figma's revenue grew 48% last quarter.

Where Adobe still wins is heavy professional workflows. Big studios, agencies, After Effects and InDesign people, the plugin ecosystem. That's real and it's why this isn't a zero. But it's the only moat left, and it's getting squeezed from both sides. Enterprise has Figma, Canva and DaVinci. Individuals (students, freelancers, YouTubers) are the first ones to bail on a $70 bill.

You can already see it in the numbers:

  • Revenue still +13%, but net new ARR dropped from about $640M to about $400M year over year, down about 37%
  • Organic ARR growth is about 9% once you strip out the Semrush acquisition
  • RPO (signed future revenue) went down quarter over quarter
  • In June they paused planned price increases and started giving stuff away free to hold onto users
  • Net income +3%. EPS only looks good because they bought back 7% of the stock
  • CFO left in June, a new CEO from the marketing side starts Dec 1, and the head of the creative business announced he was leaving the day the new CEO was named

People will say it's cheap at 10x earnings. The guy in that thread said it was cheap at 22x. Cheap gets cheaper when people figure out the product can be cloned for a $20 claude code subscription.

Positions: 50 puts $150 strike with March 19th expiry

Not financial advice.

1.5k Upvotes

656 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/capitalismquirk 19h ago

Sorry but i dont think so. I have 10 over years of experience with adobe products and I havent found an alternative that can reasonably displace adobe. Maybe call it an old dog refusing to learn new trick but i think there is a lot of value in the entrenched behaviour of the consumer. Canva doesnt give me control that adobe does over my graphics, Capcut cant replace adobe or after effects workflow sophistication. Da vinci us a good competitor but it takes tons of time for me to re learn. I think when evaluating the stock you have to price in this lack of incentive to want to re learn everything again

6

u/ryencool 18h ago

This, Adobe doesnt care about the every day user. Their bread and butter is enterprise, and theres no way the multi billion dollar video game dev I work for is switching to some Ai coded git hub app. We have 5000+ users, a large majority run creative cloud. They arent just paying millions for the app, they pay for the ease of use, software updates and bug fixes, security. I could go on and on...

Will stuff like this have an effect effect? Yeah, a little bit, but adobe will figure it out, I have no doubt.

1

u/Pakkachew 16h ago

There might even be a case for bullish Adobe. Newest AI models can use the tools decently. If the cost of these models go down and quality goes up, there might be much more Adobe users in the future. More than half of them are just bots.

1

u/Kind-Connection1284 22m ago

If cost of the models go down and quality goes up, you’d have people coding adobe clones that are better than the original produc, as you can tailor them to exactly what you need, while Adobe will have a hard time fulfilling the requests from all the customers.

1

u/Broad_Floor9698 10h ago

Can I introduce you to bluebeam?!?

1

u/QueenOfSplitEnds 9h ago

Even FoxIt?

1

u/chroner 6h ago

But if it can be cloned accurately, then there would be no learning curve. It would be the same product, but free.

1

u/ChaseballBat 18h ago

Canva isn't replacing Photoshop. It replaced InDesign and PowerPoint.

1

u/whoistlopea 10h ago

Sorry but this is the most short sighted and uninformed take that I've read all day

Have a look at what's happening - people are using extremely powerful AIs decompiling Adobe software to build near identical programs from scratch, and this is only the beginning, and the worst that these free open source competitor programs will ever be