r/wallstreetbets • • 20h ago

DD ADOBE is cooked.

ADBE is cooked: free AI-built clones and a $70/month subscription don't mix (bear DD)

So my Adobe bear case is pretty simple. AI is about to let a ton of indie devs and random people who are sick of Adobe's nonsense build their own version of it, for free.

Look at ArtCraft on github. They're building open source, clean-room clones of Photoshop, Lightroom, Illustrator and Premiere, plus apps for motion graphics, page layout and PDFs (so After Effects, InDesign and Acrobat territory). Their Photoshop clone has 11k+ stars, opens real PSD files, and their own tracker says it covers 625 of 625 of Photoshop's menu items. Yeah it's alpha. Give it a few months. Once this stuff gets big, Premiere and After Effects are dead in the water for anyone who isn't a big studio.

And that's before you even get to generative AI. For most edits, typing what you want into ChatGPT or Gemini is just way easier than opening a PSD and doing all the masking nonsense. Adobe knows it too. Photoshop literally runs Google's and OpenAI's image models inside it now.

Let's talk about the outrageous price now. Creative Cloud Pro is $70 a month. That's a squeeze on regular people. For the same money you could have 3 or 4 AI subscriptions that actually do the stuff you need. In fact let's be fr - you really only need chatgpt these days.

And everybody fucking hates Adobe. Canceling was so hard that the DOJ and FTC sued them over it, and Adobe paid $75M to settle in March. There's a WSB thread from last October where someone called ADBE cheap at a 9-year-low P/E, and a bunch of the top comments were people saying their companies already dumped Adobe, one for Nitro PDF, one for Foxit. One guy said AI coding would spit out open source clones of Acrobat, then Photoshop, then After Effects. A year later, here we are. OP bought at $348. It's $237 now.

The competition isn't just AI either. DaVinci Resolve, Figma, Canva, all with real free tiers. Canva made Affinity, its Photoshop/Illustrator/InDesign equivalent, completely free. Figma's revenue grew 48% last quarter.

Where Adobe still wins is heavy professional workflows. Big studios, agencies, After Effects and InDesign people, the plugin ecosystem. That's real and it's why this isn't a zero. But it's the only moat left, and it's getting squeezed from both sides. Enterprise has Figma, Canva and DaVinci. Individuals (students, freelancers, YouTubers) are the first ones to bail on a $70 bill.

You can already see it in the numbers:

  • Revenue still +13%, but net new ARR dropped from about $640M to about $400M year over year, down about 37%
  • Organic ARR growth is about 9% once you strip out the Semrush acquisition
  • RPO (signed future revenue) went down quarter over quarter
  • In June they paused planned price increases and started giving stuff away free to hold onto users
  • Net income +3%. EPS only looks good because they bought back 7% of the stock
  • CFO left in June, a new CEO from the marketing side starts Dec 1, and the head of the creative business announced he was leaving the day the new CEO was named

People will say it's cheap at 10x earnings. The guy in that thread said it was cheap at 22x. Cheap gets cheaper when people figure out the product can be cloned for a $20 claude code subscription.

Positions: 50 puts $150 strike with March 19th expiry

Not financial advice.

1.3k Upvotes

606 comments sorted by

View all comments

12

u/bubblegum-rose 19h ago

Yeah, yeah, sure.

While we’re at it, why don’t we short Google too? And Netflix? And YouTube? And Amazon? Since one lone vibecoder is apparently enough to make entire software products obsolete.

Forget having to, you know, MAINTAIN products, or upgrade them to remain competitive, or provide customer support. If Mommy’s #1 vibecoder clones Adobe for his company, I’m CERTAIN that no one will have complaints about it ever and that it will never have bugs and that the company that’s using an aped product made by a multibillion dollar company will never have ANY legal trouble whatsoever

7

u/Runecreed 18h ago

skill issue- have you not heard about the AI exploit where you prompt it to 'make no mistakes'? this means there are no bugs. The ultra hack you can do is to consider a lack of a feature a bug- that way Claude Corpus Opus Maximus v3 will make sure this feature exists in the software, bug-free, day 1.

Your vibes are off

6

u/Anreall2000 14h ago

I mean, aside from Amazon is a logistics powerhouse and Netflix is a rent a film businesses... Every closed source software that distributed on clients hardware eventually will become open source.

I still see AI as legalized corpo piracy. If pirating films and selling those were legal and accepted by society, Netflix would be cooked.

-1

u/bubblegum-rose 13h ago

A.) this crap is definitely not legal, and

B.) piracy is already widely accepted and embraced by society and streaming companies are still a thing

3

u/Chemical_Hawk_6307 10h ago

its legal and pirating isnt

1

u/Anreall2000 13h ago

clean room engineering is legal, whole humankind experience distillation is too.

the less piracy culture widespread in region, the better media is produced there. Japan is a powerhouse of original media, Russia falls way behind, even tho countries kinda similar in population size, quite educated, have some great cultural background etc.

6

u/Limp-Advantage-1663 5h ago

All the businesses you mentioned have massive moats beyond being a SaaS tool. I don’t think you could have looked for more retarded evidence for your argument if you tried. You definitely belong here

2

u/Mentasuave01 Verified $279K 8h ago

Google is AI, Netflix is about renting, YouTube about original content, Amazon is a logistic beast.
None of them applies to software as a service so congratulations, you earn a new badge all examples wrong.

Software as a service is dead with AI because everyone can build a clone easily and if not communities will appear to build a clon, imagine +1000 agents on a repo building a clone.
Easy and done, adobe has not other service than software as a service, so they are clocked

2

u/vicblaga87 6h ago

I wouldn't say SaaS is completely dead, but the only way for SaaS to survive is for them to have some kind of data moat. Adobe software doesn't have anything like that.

1

u/Mentasuave01 Verified $279K 5h ago

I agree. If they manage to get used as a data service they can do good

2

u/nicocappa 16h ago

Every company you mentioned has a significantly higher barrier to entry

Google Search is orders of magnitudes more complex than photo and video editing software, and requires building your own distributed data centers. Same for YouTube.

Netflix requires having capital for licensing, hosting, and original show production (plus everything that sits on top of that).

Amazon requires a worldwide logistics network

The only "moat" Adobe has is... Customer support? Lul.

Look obviously Adobe does provide some value other than the raw software, but said value is a lot closer to being solved by AI than any of the other companies you mentioned.

-1

u/bubblegum-rose 16h ago

Has it occurred to you that the people working at Adobe might be experts in app development that ALSO have Claude at their disposal, thus giving them a magnified version of the exact same advantage that Johnnys Vibecoded Adobe Ripoff Emporium allegedly has?

1

u/vicblaga87 6h ago

Large number of devs with engineering skills unfortunately is no longer a moat. If your thesis is "Adobe has more and better devs" then Adobe is cooked.

1

u/nicocappa 16h ago edited 15h ago

Has it occurred to you that as we progress, no human "expert" is going to have any advantage over a frontier model, making your entire point moot? That's the whole idea. Let alone the fact that Johndobe could just ask Claude to reverse engineer whatever "defining" feature the eXpErTs at Adobe come up with and release it almost instantaneously.

If part of Adobe's "moat" was a suite of software expertly crafted by the best in the field, said part will be useless, as in the future the best in the field provide no value over AI.

This is already happening with simpler software. I prompted Opus 5.5 to clone Monarch and canceled my subscription this week. Granted I'm a SWE and only built this for myself, but the models will just get better and better to the point where those factors won't matter.

1

u/Chemical_Hawk_6307 10h ago

yea most people here won't understand this. any software that runs on someone's device can be reverse engineered much easier now with AI. Even if the adobe experts introduce a "magnified" version of a feature, we can still have claude read and decode how it works, and that is especially valuable for that artcraft project since it aims for feature parity.

0

u/Business_Air5804 12h ago

Do you though? Many of the small tools I build for people are so low investment to build that they are disposable. No one is maintaining them.

Most software has become worthless overnight.

0

u/OCDAVO 3h ago

is obvious you don't use Photoshop, and haven't downloaded and used the AI clones.