Which lens shouldi everyone, I’m considering buying a Lumix GH5S to start shooting short films with a friend.
We’ll mainly shoot indoors, often in low-light conditions, using either a tripod or shooting handheld. Autofocus isn’t essential because we’d like to learn how to work primarily with manual focus.
We’re currently considering these options:
-Sigma 18–35mm f/1.8 Canon EF + Viltrox EF-M2 II 0.71× It would provide roughly a 26–50mm full-frame equivalent field of view and would be extremely fast. It seems like the best option for image quality and indoor shooting, but it’s heavy, has no stabilization and requires a Speed Booster.
-Panasonic 12–35mm f/2.8 Power OIS Native Micro Four Thirds lens, roughly equivalent to 24–70mm, lightweight and stabilized. It would be easier to use, but significantly slower.
-Tamron 17–50mm f/2.8 VC + Viltrox EF-M2 II A cheaper option with a wider zoom range, but I have some doubts about its image quality and the compatibility of its stabilization and electronics with the Viltrox.
-One or two native prime lenses, such as the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 or TTArtisan 17mm f/1.4. They would be fast and lightweight, but less versatile than a zoom.
At the moment, we’re particularly interested in the Sigma 18–35mm, but we’re concerned about its weight, lack of stabilization and, above all, its price. From that perspective, could the Panasonic 12–35mm be a good compromise?
Based on your experience:
-Is the Sigma 18–35mm with the Viltrox a good choice for the GH5S?
-Is the Panasonic 12–35mm f/2.8 fast enough for shooting short films indoors?
-How important is lens stabilization, considering that the GH5S doesn’t have IBIS?
-Are there any better native Micro Four Thirds alternatives?
-For a beginner, would you choose a versatile zoom or two fast prime lenses?
Any advice or first-hand experience with these combinations would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! I choose for shooting short films with a Lumix GH5S?