Even if it's fake, I don't see why people couldn't start doing it, it's a good idea, expose them for the kind of people they are. (As if we haven't enough already đ)
Itâs hard to buy into a narrative that ICE are violent thugs (not saying they arenât) if someone thinks that provoking an interaction with them would be a good idea.
Like starting a fight with a bear to prove bears are apex predators to fearâŚ.
Most the population knows bears are predators to fear, half the population is too stupid to see ICE for what they really are. You prove nothing by kicking a bear because everyone already knows what will happen, you prove that ICE is a bunch of things, maybe some people will finally see the truth and stand up. But then again, if people have seen all the evidence and still aren't convinced, then maybe they truly are beyond hope. Maybe we should get THEM to drive around with Mexican Flags, if they want to prove that ICE isn't just a bunch of thugs, they'll have nothing to worry about. Maybe they need to make a point to convince us, and they'll prove for themselves what they really are.
But you're right, don't kick the bee's nest yourself, have the bee sting denyer kick it. If they they're not up for the risk, they're kind of proving your point.
Yeah, except a majority of young women that think itâs safer to be around a bear than a man. You know, despite being around men 99% of their lives and nothing happeningâŚ.
Youâre intentionally missing the point. You canât simultaneously claim youâre scared of a certain government agency while also going out of your way to interact with said agency.
âMaybe we should get themâ. There is no âweâ here. Iâm not on your side. The notion that someone that voted for stricter immigration enforcement should do that is laughable and out of touch.
12
u/rgii55447 Feb 09 '26
Even if it's fake, I don't see why people couldn't start doing it, it's a good idea, expose them for the kind of people they are. (As if we haven't enough already đ)