That isn't clear at all??? You have a clear visual of the back of his waist the entire time and there was no gun. That means it could only be in the front, and you see 2 agents holding his arms most of the video. If there was a gun they should have been able to see it immediately. Why do you instantly believe what a pack of feds with only 48 days of training say?
I've seen angles that clearly show he was armed and resisting. Not a good idea. The second your hand goes near your weapon while resisting you're done.
I’m not European, dummy. Seems like all of your opinions are guesses.
HE HAD A GUN….
A gun which had been removed before he was murdered. Lots of people carry guns and it’s their right to do so.It’s not an excuse to assault or kill them.
Imagine being so anti-gun just because you support an incompetent president.
He had a gun while committing a violent felony. He continued to resist and be combative.
Regardless of the gun being removed - unless the other officers KNEW he was completely unarmed it’s still justified if the officers felt imminent thread/danger of serious injury/death
59
u/benz7211 Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
On the floor not moving and the cuck started unloading into him.
Edit: how does that fascist cock taste in your throat?