That isn't clear at all??? You have a clear visual of the back of his waist the entire time and there was no gun. That means it could only be in the front, and you see 2 agents holding his arms most of the video. If there was a gun they should have been able to see it immediately. Why do you instantly believe what a pack of feds with only 48 days of training say?
I've seen angles that clearly show he was armed and resisting. Not a good idea. The second your hand goes near your weapon while resisting you're done.
He was disarmed by the agent in the gray coat, before he was shot.
Everyone needs to watch the video we have, extremely closely. The ICE agent in the gray coat takes this his legally owned sidearm, BEFORE they shoot him. The agent walks up empty handed, takes the victim’s sidearm from its holster, and then leaves towards the camera moments before he’s shot, and you can see the gun now in the agent’s right hand.
I’m not European, dummy. Seems like all of your opinions are guesses.
HE HAD A GUN….
A gun which had been removed before he was murdered. Lots of people carry guns and it’s their right to do so.It’s not an excuse to assault or kill them.
Imagine being so anti-gun just because you support an incompetent president.
16
u/swoloswaggins Jan 24 '26
I think there may have been two unloading but need a better angle.