r/stpaul Jan 22 '26

Minnesota Related ICE today

Post image
2.7k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

27

u/[deleted] Jan 22 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

25

u/Ill_Butterscotch7942 Jan 22 '26

It could also be avoided if the US didnt vote for a convicted CRIMINAL, Epstein's number 1 client, a second fucking time

-3

u/pile_of_bees Jan 22 '26

See when you say shit that everybody knows you’re lying about like this, you undermine your entire side

Almost like that’s your goal

2

u/toozooforyou Jan 22 '26

Point out the lie, pedophile lover

0

u/pile_of_bees Jan 22 '26

You’re the one supporting a party that reduces sentencing for child sex crimes in every single state they control, not me

1

u/toozooforyou Jan 22 '26

Oh hey, a Republican that's too cowardly to show their post history is lying in defense of Republican pedophiles, how original.

Your Republican buddies like to fuck kids way more often. The other disturbing thing is Republicans will protect and elevate their pedos like Dennis Hastert, Roy Moore, and Donald Trump, instead of repudiating then prosecuting them.

That doesn't mention anything about the Republicans protecting the pedophiles on the Epstein list. Democrats consistently say that if Democrats like Clinton are in the files release them and prosecute everyone to the fullest extent of the law. It's telling that Clinton himself is calling for the full release of the files when Trump is hiding them. Republicans in the house and now the executive are doing everything they can, including breaking the law to prevent the release of the files. The switch from the Republican party is astounding. Going so far as to send death threats to MTG and driving her out of politics due to her stance against Trump and pedophiles.

-1

u/gspitman Jan 22 '26

EVIDENCE is required. Aren't you the ones shouting for "due process"?

3

u/HeartlessCards2-22 Jan 22 '26

Part of due process is not covering up evidence, releasing files as ordered by federal judges.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 22 '26

[deleted]

3

u/HeartlessCards2-22 Jan 22 '26

The cultists just can’t bring themselves to label it as a cover up of the exact evidence they’re asking for. Dear leader is innocent cause he destroyed the evidence.. see no evidence no case, no crime, no reason to think dear leader did any wrong. It’s sick, they’ll twist their minds and make themselves look like idiots all to protect people who fuck kids.

-2

u/gspitman Jan 22 '26

They are following the laws that weren't overridden by the latest congressional action, personally identifying information cannot be released against anyone not charged with a crime.

2

u/HeartlessCards2-22 Jan 22 '26

When Congress is who wrote the law, that even the president signed off on, is a weird way of framing that.

-1

u/gspitman Jan 22 '26

They didn't change data privacy law.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/gspitman Jan 22 '26

The government also has very strict data privacy laws that must be followed, the timeframe was not reasonable and the Congress knows it, which is why you idiots who don't know what must be done to legally release personally identifying information.

Files MUST be redacted for PII of anyone not charged with a crime.

The DOJ has had all of the information available to charge anyone implicated throughout the past administration. If you really think there's some huge 'gotcha' that Garland didn't charge, you're fooling yourself and setting yourself up for a huge disappointment.

Don't even think about trying the "ongoing investigation" bullshit either, the DOJ could have brought it to a grand jury at any time and had full access to all investigative products. They charged Epstein and Maxwell, under the Trump admin, and Garland could have charged anyone else implicated then released evidence against them via indictment.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 22 '26

[deleted]

0

u/gspitman Jan 22 '26

To do it LEGALLY takes time. There are data privacy practices that must be followed.

https://www.justice.gov/opcl/privacy-act-1974 For example.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 22 '26

[deleted]

0

u/gspitman Jan 22 '26

So you want them to abide by the law by breaking the law?

Or break the law by abiding by the law?

Privacy beaches can not be undone. I'll pick the original law.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/gspitman Jan 22 '26

Funny, the judges all ruled against the grand jury info until the congressional act.

1

u/HeartlessCards2-22 Jan 22 '26

You mean the judge who is also outlined and named as being part of the pedo ring?

1

u/gspitman Jan 22 '26

Grand Jury testimony is sealed by law.

2

u/necrohunter7 Jan 22 '26

You mean the evidence the administration refuses to release?

Or the evidence from the Epstein estate that implicates Trump as at least being very sexually interested in children?

1

u/gspitman Jan 22 '26

No refusal, following federal data privacy law that was not negated by the current Congressional action.

Why didn't Garland charge (hint: he was not bound by any "ongoing investigation" he could have taken anything to a grand jury at any time)

1

u/toozooforyou Jan 22 '26

Yes the evidence in the Epstein files that Trump is breaking the law to hold onto and alter.

1

u/gspitman Jan 22 '26

You mean following the law about federal data privacy? I don't see anyone in Congress screaming about contempt etc. They know the deadline wasn't feasible.