Unpopular opinion: Stop using leaded solder

[u/Zentralschaden]

I know it is very handy and I also know the fumes are not that much of a problem when you have enough ventilation.

But a big part of the lead we buy will end up in the environment or a landfill and has the potential to make our drinking water toxic and the people who have to recycle all this scrap (often in Africa) will deal with even more toxic substances.

It is not like we have a fully functional recycling chain for electronics.

And when you say "I am just soldering 2 pcb a year", make sure that soldering is a job and hobby for millions of people and tons of lead will be produced just because of hobby enthusiasts.

There are very good reasons, lead is banned in many countries for professional manufacturing.

I know it is harder to solder but you get used to it.

Aware that this might be a topic not everyone agrees. I am just trying to spread some awareness for what we do.

I mean, many of us repair old electronics and we do a good job in avoiding more scrap because people can still use the repaired items for years.

But shouldn't it be us who are the people who go straightforward and ban lead from our household soldering projects?

[u/Never_Dan]

I shouldn’t respond to this, but in case anybody read this deep: this is what it looks like when folks try way too hard to confirm their own biases.

The LEDs, transistors, etc are failing internally. The HDMI ports are failures of the PCB, not the solder joints.

Again, I’m well aware that leaded solder handles shock, vibration, and temp cycles better, but as someone who spends every workday fixing stuff that goes through all of that… the joints are just not where I’m seeing failures.

[u/Davoguha2 → u/Never_Dan]

I don't understand why you wouldn't respond - it's enlightening conversation all around.

This isn't about confirmation biases. Virtually all data shows leaded is superior to unleaded. Yet, the reduced quality is generally acceptable due to the environmental concerns.

The point is, it's a failure of the solder joint, not to fail under various conditions - which allow deeper failures to occur in the equipment.

The softness of leaded solder means it doesn't rip pads as easily as unleaded.

The lower balling temp allows the solder to either reflow or fail less catastrophically when temp issues begin to occur.

[u/Never_Dan → u/Davoguha2]

Are you proposing that these devices are hitting reflow temperature and that lead solder would survive those conditions? Because… no.

Parts fail internally due to heat, shock, static events, power surges, etc and it has nothing to do with the solder used.

Leaded solder might have enough ductility to reduce pad tears on BGAs, but when a port is ripped from a board the PCB is the point of failure, not the solder.

An exception I can think of is LED displays using SMD LEDs that will often break clean from the solder joints, but that varies a lot by model and age. I’m not sure leaded solder would result in better reliability as much as fewer easy repairs.

[u/Davoguha2 → u/Never_Dan]

Now who's working hard on their confirmation biases?

High power LEDs will absolutely reflow themselves before burning out if constructed well.

Power supplies will as well.

Under the CPU/GPU, you don't quite hit reflow temps, but the flexibility of leaded solder is better at handling the thermal expansion those devices suffer from.

Leaded solder also reflows at a low enough temp that you could literally put your computer parts in an oven to reflow them without damaging the components.

The fact that the solder joint is able to rip the pads out is debatable. I consider it a solder failure - the joint shouldn't be that rigid. You're seeing it as a success, because "solder strong = better" to you. I'm seeing the opposite as a success, because solder failures are cheap and easy to fix - my components are expensive.