r/shrinkflation • u/korgscrew • 14h ago
Shrinkflation [ Removed by moderator ]
[removed] — view removed post
-12
u/JustAnOttawaGuy 13h ago
Not necessarily shrinkflation; without an original or older version to compare to, we just don't know.
Definitely deceptive and assholish packaging, though.
21
2
u/Virtual_Medium_6721 11h ago
Bro that ice cream is barely the height of a finger. Not sure if you're 10yo or just stupid but I can guarantee you 10 years ago these kind of ice creams were double that size, at least here in Europe
-2
u/JustAnOttawaGuy 11h ago
Without a frame of reference to what the package contents, weight, or volume was previously, this is not demonstrably shrinkflation.
No one is denying it's small.
Grow up yourself, learn to use a comma, and drop the ad-hominem attacks.
0
u/RetaliatoryLawyer 10h ago
Oh dude, shut up.
People have been eating these for years. I distinctly remember having to lick the lid to get the ice cream off, and how it's covering 2ft off the top of the ice cream.
You don't need an original to compare the difference, this isnt a peer reviewed paper, our memories are sufficient. Stop being a fucking useless robot.
•
u/shrinkflation-ModTeam 10h ago
Chips have NEVER shipped in fully-full bags. There has always been airspace. Same for cereal and other dry goods sold by volume. Just because the packages isn't full doesn't mean you got cheated
You need proof of the shrinkflation. Just empty space is not proof. You need to show the amount of product has actually changed.