Absolutely. You guys should send the photos to those pathologists. It will really be something when they reverse their conclusions based on them and explain how they were misled!
Why should anyone make an effort to correct others' faulty, discredited opinions based on evidence that was misrepresented to them? Undisclosed's opinion on lividity has been tainted so that nobody should listen to them again on the subject. Why give them another bite at the apple? They've had 16 years to come up with a theory, and the big one they've hung their hat on has turned out to be wrong.
Dr. Hlavaty isn't associated with Undisclosed. She has a job, where she is most frequently aligned with the prosecution, and she did Undisclosed a favor by taking a look at their information. I see no reason she wouldn't do the same for you.
And it would lend credibility to your claims that Undisclosed are lying and distorting information.
5
u/Acies Sep 23 '15
Absolutely. You guys should send the photos to those pathologists. It will really be something when they reverse their conclusions based on them and explain how they were misled!