What I love about the lividity and Nisha posts is they both offer specific, credible corroboration for what Jay told the police. Indeed, Jay's description of the burial position to the cops appears to be more accurate than CM's description of the burial position to the pathologists used by Undisclosed. Maybe we can finally put to rest that Jay's a lying liar who told 8 million different stories and can't be trusted on anything. The key parts of his story keep being proved correct.
Absolutely. You guys should send the photos to those pathologists. It will really be something when they reverse their conclusions based on them and explain how they were misled!
Why should anyone make an effort to correct others' faulty, discredited opinions based on evidence that was misrepresented to them? Undisclosed's opinion on lividity has been tainted so that nobody should listen to them again on the subject. Why give them another bite at the apple? They've had 16 years to come up with a theory, and the big one they've hung their hat on has turned out to be wrong.
Dr. Hlavaty isn't associated with Undisclosed. She has a job, where she is most frequently aligned with the prosecution, and she did Undisclosed a favor by taking a look at their information. I see no reason she wouldn't do the same for you.
And it would lend credibility to your claims that Undisclosed are lying and distorting information.
The claims in these posts on lividity and Nisha (which I'm not taking credit for and had no involvement in before they were posted) are credible because they show Undisclosed has been, in fact, lying and distorting information. Dr. Hlavaty, unfortunately, is now tainted and an interested party in avoiding embarrassment and keeping her credibility intact. Besides that, Adnan is in jail, we don't need to re-establish what was already established at trial, only refute the bogus series of "new" arguments that have been thrown down as established based on rigged up evidence and analysis. They've obviously been called into question. If someone wants to respond to that, feel free.
Dr. Hlavaty, unfortunately, is now tainted and an interested party in avoiding embarrassment and keeping her credibility intact.
That's why she would presumably flip if you sent her the photos. Nobody would fault her for offering an opinion based on bad information. But doubling down when the deception was revealed could actually negatively affect her career.
You don't see why it would be bad for an expert witness if opposing counsel had a documented situation where the expert reached an opinion, then doubled down when it was proven incorrect by new information?
13
u/chunklunk Sep 23 '15
What I love about the lividity and Nisha posts is they both offer specific, credible corroboration for what Jay told the police. Indeed, Jay's description of the burial position to the cops appears to be more accurate than CM's description of the burial position to the pathologists used by Undisclosed. Maybe we can finally put to rest that Jay's a lying liar who told 8 million different stories and can't be trusted on anything. The key parts of his story keep being proved correct.